Boring

Awesome Movie

As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Granted, I try NOT to watch terrible movies, so I'm sure there's worse out there.Where to start? I guess the opening credits. There's some train shots that would look like a 1974 promo clip for the Smokey Mountain Railway, with font and music that makes one ponder if anyone involved has ever done anything in the movie industry. Of course the promo-clip analogy was doing it justice, as the train sequence has many obvious toy train images. Fresh with Astroturf.Of course, Michael Madsen's on the cover. He's barely in the film, but just go ahead and dupe-us by putting him front and center on the best thing about the movie, the cover.The acting here is beyond terrible. It's like a Saturday night live skit, fresh with actors reading off cards, only add-on wooden faces and no enunciation. It's truly dreadful. I could make a better film than this. I'm broke, have no professional experience in front of or behind the camera, but IM CERTAIN I could make a better film than this.The few action sequences are as embarrassing as the rest of the characteristics.Avoid at all costs - unless you're just trying to see one of the worst movies of all-time. Some films are so bad they're somewhat entertaining(Birdemic, The Thing with Two Heads, etc), but this one is just bad bad. It hurts. Not a scene goes by where you don't shake your head and wonder if these people even knew they were actually live and shooting this.8/100 easily my lowest rating. Makes Master of Disguise, Glitter, Gigli, Pluto Nash, Room, Birdemic and Leonard Part 6 LOOK DECENT. Seriously!

I can't believe that I finally found something that makes home movies look like masterful works of art.Every time a scene came on with Michael Madsen, all I could say was "Oh Michael...how far you've sunk." After 20 minutes, we put it on pause and sat there looking at the screen talking about the good movies that he was in, and finally turned it off.I can honestly say that we didn't pay for this piece of tripe - we borrowed it from the library. I feel sorry for the person who actually paid good money for it.This movie was just plain sad and it will be one cold day in hell when we watch it again. I think that Christopher Forbes shouldn't quit his day job quite yet.

I am a great fan of western, even those spaghetti films are making me very excited and love a good ole gunfight but this lacked just about everything you like in a western... but THERE... to be honest the film seems like it was made at a high school club The town is made from some cheesy Disney plaster and plastic one. The clothes look like they have all just been delivered from the factory, the holsters are all brand new and never used and they have silver bling bling guns that shoots like my lil nephew's one. Cheesy soundtrack played on some home piano, very very bad acting, and it was filmed using a digital camera at low cost. This "movie" looks like something some student put on the broadcast website. How can someone do something like this? Even in hell, they won't do this to you...

I would have given this poorly named movie a ZERO had the option been there, but I suppose IMDb site owners have not factored into their calculations the probability of that ever happening. This movie has done it with style. Had the phrase "3:10 to Yuma RIDES UP TO TRUE GRIT" not screamed out at me to give it a chance, the cover alone was a sufficient tip off that this flick was a flop. I had given up watching the movie at just the exact time when I sensed my intelligence could no longer be insulted, which was just about 35 minutes into it. I was nonetheless mesmerized by its outlandish plot, inept camera work and the "actors" natural rigid performance which is no performance at all. These three ingredients I thought are what make a good comedy.