An absolute waste of money

It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

This is one awful movie. It has nothing going for it. I can't believe people were paid to make this kind of crap.Acting? Non-existent!Dialogue? Are you kidding me?!SFX? PsOne video games look better!Production value? On par with an amateur porn film!Those 8-10-star reviews? They must be from employees at the Sy-fy channel or somehow connected to the production of this film. I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would like this terrible waste of time.Stay far away. You're better off watching paint dry.

Chinese water torture? The Iron Maiden? Thumbscrews? How about being forced to watch Alien Blood/Siege? Is there a difference between these?Yes- the first three are a walk in the park compared to this horrendous waste of money, film and (luckily) only 25 minutes of my life time.Not since Saving Private Ryan have I felt physically ill through the first 20 minutes of a movie.Im just annoyed it was a TV movie, at least if I had been at a cinema I could have demanded my money back.If you have any respect for yourself you will avoid this at all costs.

I watched this partly because of the huge gap between the positive and negative reviews here on IMDb.It's hard for me to believe that there's anyone PAYING IMDb reviewers to pump up the reviews for anything at all, much less a relatively low budget made-for-sciffy-channel waste of time. But hey, since you're obviously out there somewhere, drop me a line, I could use the spare change... Okay, just kidding.But it's terrible. Of course you'll probably need to make your own decision, but when you do, count my vote on the "for goodness' sake DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME" side. I hope for your sake reading these reviews is ALL the time you waste on this movie.The ONLY positive I can think of is that SOME of the acting wasn't horrible. All the special effects are, most of the writing is (some of it's merely mediocre), and although I don't consider myself much of a judge of directing or cinematography, it certainly isn't good enough to redeem this turkey.

Among the hundreds of watched movies this must be one of the worst.. Pretty much everything is plainly wrong with it. No offense to people trying to make low budget movies, SciFi or not, au contraire, this movie is a mold in the eye for those who's REALLY trying to make something good with whatever budget the might have. Script, directing, dialog, acting, lightning, camera, CGI and again.. the SCRIPT, they must have been drunk on Kulku. If U against all odds found "V" to be entertaining prepare for a amazingly if possible even worse ripoff. Sorry guys (director Robert Stadd, writers Bill Lundy, Paul Salamoff) but plz don't quit your day jobs, OK. The only feeling left after watching this *hrmftpp* "movie" is anger, anger due to dragging SciFi in the dirt..