Bachelor Party in the Bungalow of the Damned
Bachelor Party in the Bungalow of the Damned
NR | 24 September 2008 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
Bachelor Party in the Bungalow of the Damned Trailers

The story focuses on a group of thirtysomething guys who head up to the Hamptons to a buddy's bungalow to throw a bachelor party for another friend. Once there, a group of middle-aged, overweight hookers (who look nothing, NOTHING like the girl on the cover. . . not even a little bit!) stop by randomly and give the boys a show. Unfortunately, they're possessed by some type of evil/demonic force and they started to kill the guys off (mostly during sex) one by one.

Reviews
Kattiera Nana

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

View More
LastingAware

The greatest movie ever!

Catangro

After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.

View More
Donald Seymour

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

View More
mattressman_pdl

A group of friends gather together for a bachelor party only to become fodder for three 'demon' strippers.First off, this movie was made for practically no money. That being said, I kind of enjoyed it more than a lot of mainstream horror films. It reminded me of the fun trash that we used to expect from Troma on a regular basis (Kaufman has as cameo). The acting was bad, but not the worst that I've seen. Some shoddy CGI makes an appearance but I thought that it actually added to the cheese factor. The editing and continuity is a nightmare but, as I said before, cheese factor.This movie is NOT for everyone or even most people. But I was surprised to get a few chuckles out of it and it wasn't as boring as most independent horror seems to be. Movies don't always have to be good to be fun.

View More
midnight_playah

Out of everyone I know, I'm the one that always defends the movies I see no matter how poor they are. I always ask my friends to have an open mind when watching a film in order to get the most enjoyment out of it. I've finally, for the first time I can recall, been unable to heed my own advice.This "film" is the worst piece of crap I have ever had the displeasure of seeing. My sense of self respect will never forgive me after after subjecting my grey matter to this kind of abuse.I hope the "actors" in this roadkill made enough to pay the administration cost for their GEDs, cause they'll need to find different work. This level of acting needs its own definition or class. It doesn't fall under any known category of professional performance art. The acting in this wet fart makes Killer Klowns from Outer Space look like The Shawshank Redemption.Now, I could theoretically look past the mind-numbing banality of the acting, or the oatmealishness of the hideous strippers (who, by the way, don't strip), or even the childish and nonsensical story. But the one thing that I found absolutely unforgivable was the "special" effects. Never before have I seen true special effects made by true special kids from the classroom beside the boiler room. These effects looked like they were lifted directly from a bootleg Japanese copy of Zombie Massacre for the NES circa 1987.Usually, I can recommend bad movies on the basis that they are so bad they're good. But this is just plain bad. I hope anyone who invested in this bucket of yuck found a high enough window to jump out of. I almost feel like I'd rather be dead than live in a world where this film exists.I cannot in good conscience recommend this film under any circumstances. DO NOT even watch it for a laugh, as you will wind up sobbing into your couch cushions like a freshly scolded toddler.0 out of 10

View More
Woodyanders

Sammy (a solid and engaging performance by Gregg Aaron Greenberg) holds a wild anything-goes bachelor party for this best buddy Chuck (a likable portrayal by Joseph Riker) at a bungalow in the Hamptons. Things go horribly awry when the three exotic dancers -- Snowy (ravishing redhead Zoe Hunter), Emerald (buxom knockout Monique Dupree), and Vermillion (foxy brunette Kaitlyn Gutkes) -- hired to supply the entertainment for said bash turn out to be ferocious demonic succubus vampires with an insatiable taste for male flesh. Writer/director Brian Thompson (who also produced, edited, and even composed the lively score) relates the blithely inane story at a constant zippy pace while delivering a nice smattering of yummy bare distaff skin and pouring on the excessive tacky graphic gore with merry aplomb. Granted, the unapologetically lowbrow humor is admittedly pretty crude and unsubtle, but still often funny in a pleasingly dry'n'deadpan way just the same. The game no-name cast have a ball with their broad roles: Greenberg excels in his juicy lead part, Trina Analee adds plenty of spunk as Chuck's feisty fiancé Michelle, Hunter, Dupree, and Gutkes are suitably sexy and naughty as the blood-sucking undead babes, Troma head honcho Lloyd Kaufman has a hilarious bit as a transvestite, plus there are sound contributions by Joe Testa as awkward'n'uptight nerd Gordon, Sean Parker as obnoxious fat jerk Paulie, and Gelu Dan Rusu as sleazy horndog Fish. The cruddy cut-rate CGI effects add to the film's considerable rinky-dink charm. Demian Barba's reasonably polished cinematography does the trick. The gut-busting ending credits provide some of the movie's best and most uproarious jokes. An absolute hoot.

View More
Anthony Pittore III (Shattered_Wake)

'Bachelor Party in the Bungalow of the Damned' - What a title, huh? How could this fail with at least being really fun? I don't know, but it did.The story focuses on a group of thirtysomething guys who head up to the Hamptons to a buddy's bungalow to throw a bachelor party for another friend. Once there, a group of middle-aged, overweight hookers (who look nothing, NOTHING like the girl on the cover. . . not even a little bit!) stop by randomly and give the boys a show. Unfortunately, they're possessed by some type of evil/demonic force and they started to kill the guys off (mostly during sex) one by one.There isn't much to expect from a film like this. Technically, the film isn't the worst I've seen, but it's far from good. The cinematography is strange, it goes from steadicam to shakicam, uses random different filters for no reason whatsoever, doesn't focus properly, etc. It's often too dark to see what's going on, especially in some of the outdoor action sequences. The acting was, for the most part, bad. Sammy (Gregg Aaron Greenberg) was probably the only actor that I could really compliment, mostly because he reminded me of Jeff Anderson from the 'Clerks' movies. But, the flick only cost twenty grand to make and it's a film not made looking for great story or acting or anything of the like. It's basically a way to show off some gore effects, nudity, and have a few laughs. Unfortunately, the gore was really not good at all and looked like something out of a crappy 80s TV show. The nudity was, well, nothing we wanted to see as all three of the hookers/strippers really had nothing to offer (actually, they had TOO much to offer for the most part). There were a few laughs, mainly caused by the ridiculousness of it all, but sometimes the dialogue actually gave a giggle. The movie ran about a half-hour too long and around the 40 minute mark, I was merely counting down the time. I mean, if you're going to put most of the story into the first half, why even have the second half? Give us a break and just cut the movie down and make it a quick watch that we can either enjoy or, if we don't like it, just get over with faster. Since they didn't, it's mostly a bore with very little redemption.Final Verdict: 3/10.-AP3-

View More