That was an excellent one.

Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

Perfectly adorable

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

I really like the setting in this film. The filming locations were just breathtaking and lush. Too bad the rest of the film couldn't compliment the mood the setting could've created. The acting was annoying and any attempt to try and creep us out was vanished from this film. First of all the film has false advertising with some women possessed and crawling on the ceiling. Dismiss the cover art folks because after the film was completed, I am still trying to find this scene. In fact there really are no possession scenes in this film at all. A lame attempt on Italy trying to cash in on the found footage genre and it fails miserably. I know the Italians have had a recent resurgence of late trying to get back to the glory days of the 1970's but sorry Italy, France has taken over.

I rented this from Redbox basically going by what I read, the title and a picture of a girl possessed. Nothing, I mean NOTHING happens that is even remotely close to what was expected. You won't see any girl crawling, you'll see a guy sitting on his knees moaning and snarling while a priest exorcises him and it seems to drag out forever; in fact it drags so far that you'll start laughing. It's just growl, snarl, growl, snarl, growl, snarl, that's it. The title is Back From Hell, you won't see any hell let alone see anything come back. This is so teadious of a movie. The characters spend an enormous amount of time arguing about religion, demons, aliens or whatever. One of the girls is pregnant and it leads to something spoilerish. I'll give you an idea of how scary this Italian hand held camera film is. They make an attempt to flee and very calmly check out the car batteries only to find them dead, why, because the lights were left on, which they state is impossible since they drove there in the daytime. This is a sure fire work of Satan. Something evil has turned on their headlights. Are you scared? Do yourself a favor, if you are suffering from insomnia then go rent this. After a good 10 hour snooze you'll thank me later.

A group of fiends decide to rent a county side manor house for the 4-day holiday weekend, but its not long before unexplained supernatural forces leave one of their number seemingly possessed . A priest that happens to live next door rushes to help in this Italian offering to the booming, some would say played out, 'found footage' horror film, that I saw via Redbox under the U.S. title of "Back From Hell"Reasonably well-acted even if the story is a tad trite. Other pluses are beautiful scenery and a few,albeit admittedly seldom, tense scenes. This is a tad offset by an ending that ,while I shall not spoil, leaves something to be desired. All in all, the film was fairly watchable but ultimately forgettable

This is an Italian film that has been released in the U.S with the title Back From Hell. It's yet another film to join the lineup of hand-held camera, found-footage style productions saturating the horror genre today after a decade of heavy exploitation. As such, we sort of know what to expect. There is lackluster sound, bizarre edits, some poorly lit scenes, and CGI is absent (a relief for some). It's all "par for the course". D for Style.As far as demon possession tales go, this one is somewhat more interesting than the others. There are no spinning heads, reverse crab walks, flying crucifixes, ceiling crawls, nor holy water boiling. Events following the groups discussion on the origin of religion make one question if things may make a turn towards Sci-Fi. Each time something paranormal presents itself in the film, the camera begins to malfunction, and sometimes cuts to the next scene. We hear that the camera is being affected by these manifestations, and it drains the cameras battery (hence the untimely cut). This is a true and common occurrence in real-life paranormal investigations. Entities can draw energy from electronic devices such as cameras, phones and recorders causing them to fail or malfunction. It is to the director/writers credit that this fact was included, and he used it to cinematic advantage. B- for Originality.There's much religious subject matter within the film. One of the characters contends that religion is the result of primitive man attempting to make sense of strange events, and suggests that aliens may be responsible. Another character believes that all things can be explained scientifically, but there are some things we aren't knowledgeable enough to understand yet. Each character has a differing point of view, and their discussion invites the audience to think rather than just observe. There's no pulpit here, just some debate and theory. C+ for Substance.Most of the cast does a fairly decent acting job, and particularly so as new performers. It is not without moments of camp and shortcomings though. C- Acting.The location was brilliant, I couldn't imagine a more perfect set. It manages to be beautifully striking, and at the same time creepy and imposing. A+ SetI was unhappy with the ending, I felt that it was too vague and did a disservice to the rest of the film. There are countless ways in which it could have been improved. It's as though the writer became bored after the climatic points, and wanted to wrap things up quickly. The film wrapped in such a way that it could easily have a followup, I would definitely love to see a part 2 that brought the sci-fi possibility into fruition! Leonardo Araneo, the writer and director of this film, was unknown until now. He has made a promising debut.