I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

What a waste of my time!!!

Excellent, a Must See

n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

Although known mostly for his comedy and mystery-action roles, Cary Grant was in a number of drama films. Those were mostly in his early years, and he was quite good. In "Born to be Bad," Grant plays opposite Loretta Young who also is in a type of role she was much lesser known for in her career. Here, she plays a loose character, con artist and small-time crook who's willing to perjure herself and try any scam to make some money. She has no compunction about the proper upbringing of her young son, or concern for his future and well-being. She's quite happy to use him in any scam.Young was much more the established actor in 1934 and over time she became known for her roles as a decent woman, and caring and loving person. In this film, she commands top billing, along with a much meatier role. She plays Letty Strong. A young Jackie Kelk plays her son, Mickey, who's about 10 years old. He does very well in his role here, but as with most other childhood actors, he didn't have much of a career in films as an adult. Grant plays Malcolm Trevor, a wealthy dairy owner and caring and kind man. He's also no dupe to be hoodwinked by a scam, except possibly one of the heart. He and his wife, Alyce (played by Marion Burns) haven't been able to have children.The story takes off after Mickey is hit by a milk truck that Malcolm is driving; and Letty comes up with a scheme to bilk Trevor's company for serious damages. I won't divulge how the story plays out, except to say that a love triangle soon develops with the alluring Letty duping Malcolm into a romance that may lead to an end to his marriage.The film is a good look at Cary Grant in an early dramatic role, and Loretta Young in a diverse role. It's an interesting and entertaining film, but nothing special.

This picture was right on the cusp of the Motion Picture Production Code, and as such it ran into quite a bit of trouble before its release.This film is on another "cusp" -- right during that period from about 1932-1934 when films were beginning to be sophisticated. This film was more sophisticated than some, but not as sophisticated as others.And interestingly, this film was made when Cary Grant had been making films for only a little over a year, and it shows Cary Grant before he was...well, Cary Grant. You see none of the Cary Grant persona here. He's just another actor near the beginning of his climb "up".So this film is interesting in the annals of film-making for several reasons, but that is not saying it's a very good film. It's overly simple and almost funny in a few places where it's not supposed to be. Loretta Young is quite good here, but her character is almost as low as they go...so you're not apt to like her role very much. But, she sure was beautiful.Watch this film...once...for the time frame in which it was made. But I doubt you'll come back a second time.

Cary Grant was 30 years old and Loretta Young was 21, and neither had quite fixed their personae. Grant doesn't seem able to relax. The guy was an acrobat earlier in life but here he seems wooden. Loretta Young, on the other hand, slings that slender chassis around with abandon and looks dewy, moist, gorgeous. When she smiles, from some angles, she resembles Blythe Danner.But, man, she is a greedy and unprincipled shark. Her young son is hit by a truck. Damage is minimal but a "specialist" is brought in to tell the very wealthy Grant, who owns the truck company, that the kid may never again walk or play the violin with his feet. (Sob.) It's all set up to milk cash out of Grant and his dairy and Grant agrees to any settlement. As the "specialist" is leaving the room, he takes Young aside and mutters that she "can settle with me later -- outside." This was before the Hayes Office Of Morality and Rectitude dropped the porticullis and eliminated such salacious filth.Man, is that little kid a nuisance. He's obviously older than seven and his ears are those of an African elephant. I swear I saw them flap in a slight breeze. His voice is an irritating whine. Cary Grant and his loving wife adopt him to raise him properly. I'd have stomped him like an insect.It's diverting and it's short. It's an historical curiosity too, and Loretta Young is a delight. Not just for the eyes. She plays a rather low-down creature who smokes, chews gum, and drops her "g"s, so that "nothing" becomes "nuthin."

Well, a little LENGTH might have helped. This is a short film but a fascinating one - it's pre-Code and Loretta Young plays a tramp. It's also a pairing of two of the golden era's stars before they really hit the big time.I don't think Young was the best actress in the world but boy, was she beautiful. A face like a cameo, and she was early 20s in this. She plays an unwed mother who lives off of sugar daddies. She sees the mother lode when her brat son gets hit by a truck.Though the con doesn't work, Loretta's child is adopted by millionaire Cary Grant and his wife - or soon to be ex-wife if Young, hot on another scheme, has anything to say about it.In her TV show, Young experimented more with "against type" characters. This hard, street smart woman is a departure for her in film, and she does a good job. Grant in this has not yet matured into his incredible looks or his screen persona, but he is effective. This film is worth seeing for a glimpse of these stars as they were before they "made it." And for Young's clothes and rare, radiant beauty.