not as good as all the hype

Load of rubbish!!

Lack of good storyline.

Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.

The film is funny because it's true; this is very much how these relationships work. I read most of the other comments about this film and what I saw was just sour comments coming from people who most likely have got no idea about how these things go. I've seen things like this happen around me in Istanbul over and over again between foreigners and poor Kurds who are simply looking for a way out of their poverty and who would do ANYTHING to get a residency for the EU or US.What really horrified me was the dismissal of the 'Bulgarian' acts in the film because they are actually very important. They show us how Daniel has gotten himself in an emotional pit where he accepts that his 'lover' has a wife and a life of which he is no part. He even goes as far as rejecting the nephew of Kyril, who is offered to him on a platter and who very obviously sexually arouses him, because he's committed to a man who only sees him as a convenience.

Gaymovies are most of the times a rather boring experience as most of the times the base is just the same : not being accepted. In this movie from director Eloy de la Iglesia (unknown, but so far he made 23 movies) is a bit different but the movie looses everything due to an unbelievable story. "Los novios bulgaros" stands for the new Bulgarians and that are, in Iglesia's eyes, men who come to Spain and in return for illegal papers they play gay whore for some rich men. I can imagine that for most of the Bulgarians this item is quite insulting and Iglesia thought it was even better to add some cliché in it as well by making the Bulgarians criminals who are smuggling radio-active weapons. I dunno if Iglesia wanted to make a James Bondmovie in his dream rather than coming up with some real issues but if it was his goal to touch some modern problems of the current society (refugees who have to sell their body) then he lost it completely here. All by all the film is quite okay to watch but at one point Iglesia tries to defense a minority group by offending the others. From a cinematographic point of view you don't have to seek for surprises as well as is it just a bland job.

This is one of the really bad films I have seen lately(thanks for the gratuitous nudity!). Beside the poor acting and lack of authenticity in the representation of the Bulgarian hunk, the meager Spaniard is regretful, the whole plot is brave but lacks back up from the cast and director. The generalizations about the Bulgarians are so hmmmm...general that they should be found offensive by anyone who is Bulgarian. (My friend is and she thought it was awful too). There are so many loose ends and discrepancies, the cast and acting are so naive and not convincing. The Spaniard who supposedly is a big fish and has a consulting firm is so dumbfound with love or desire for the BulG hunk, that he looks like an idiot. The solo shots of him looking at the camera and trying to deliver some sort of documentary feel to the movie do not fit, there is nothing that can save it.Don't waste your time and money to rent this.

Spoiler Just how far will a person go for love? It's a standard theme in many movies, from "A Star Is Born" to "The Fluffer." It's also the theme of "Bulgarian Lovers."Based on the 1996 book by the veteran Spanish gay fiction author Eduardo Mendicutti and adapted for the screen by writer-director Eloy de la Iglesia and writer-star Fernando Guillen Cuervo, the story is about the love life of an architect named Daniel. Daniel is part of a group of wild, promiscuous and rather queeny homosexual men in Madrid. The influx of Eastern European men -- almost all of them sexy, penniless, starving and willing to engage in some meaningless straight-trade sex for a meal and roof over their heads -- has perked up the group's sex life. Daniel is on the lookout for the perfect man: Handsome, muscular, hairy and hung. He finds him in the Bulgarian, Kyril.But the standard problems with straight-trade men crop up. Kyril doesn't kiss. Although he's a demon in bed (there is a very funny scene where -- as the two make love for the first time -- Kyril constantly looking at his watch as Kyril's savage love-making makes Daniel desperate for it to end. Kyril cares little for Daniel except for the things Daniel can do for him (feed him, clothe him, house him). And Kyril regales Daniel with tales of his Bulgarian fiancee, Kalina.Life drifts along for Daniel and Kyril, and that's the first problem with this movie. Although actor Dritan Biba (Kyril) is drop-dead gorgeous and delivers several full-frontal nude scenes, there is little about the relationship between Daniel and Kyril to keep an audience's attention. The character of Kyril is written to be wooden, emotionally closed off and secretive. Subsequently, the performance given by Biba is about as interesting as watching paint dry. I found myself wishing for more sex scenes, just to keep my attention.Kyril's desire for money and then more money leads him to engage in a number of shady deals. He co-opts Daniel by having him hold on to large packages, co-sign loans, and "fix" Kyril's immigration papers so that he can stay in Madrid legally. Kyril even has Daniel consult for a Bulgarian oil magnate with organized-crime connections. The problem is that the audience knows how this is going to turn out: Kyril is going to do something horrific, Daniel is going to abet his crime despite his better angels, and Daniel will end up alone.Matters take an even worse turn at the film's mid-point when Kalina, Kyril's fiancee, shows up in Madrid. Daniel is shoved aside as the two lovers reunite. Daniel attempts to take up with another Bulgarian, the beautiful (aren't they all?) Emil. But home-intruders break in and interrupt their love-making. Were these men Mafiosa? Or were they sent by Kyril to break up the burgeoning love affair between Daniel and Emil? We never really know. But the gorgeous Emil quickly disappears.The film takes a bit of a sidelight when Kyril is beaten (by his shady business partners, or just street ruffians?) and is hospitalized. Daniel demands that Kyril give up all his shady dealings, but Kyril refuses. Instead, Kyril announces that he, Daniel and Kalina must return to Bulgaria for Kyril and Kalina's wedding.The Bulgarian sequences are relatively uninteresting. Little of consequence occurs. Daniel naturally is insanely jealous of Kalina, and tries to break off his relationship with Kyril. Kyril ruthlessly seduces him, however. Daniel complains that he is as much Kyril's wife as Kalina is, and that Kyril should dance with him as he danced with Kalina at the wedding. Kyril does so. That alone assuages Daniel's anger, and all is well again. I practically groaned out loud when this happened. Developments like this are so completely predictable. Daniel's narrated rationales for his decisions are uninspired and unoriginal.The lone plot development is that Daniel meets and is attracted to Kyril's young, handsome, over-sexed cousin, Robi. Robi, it seems, is a budding homosexual. He attempts to seduce Daniel, but Daniel rushes back into Kyril's arms.Back in Madrid, Daniel is once again shoved aside. To make Daniel happy, Kyril and Kalina spend time with Daniel at the country home where Daniel's parents live. But soon thereafter Kyril is arrested and jailed for smuggling. Kyril tells Daniel that he stashed a bag at Daniel's parents' house. If Daniel retrieves the bag and delivers it to the shady Bulgarian oil magnate, Kyril will be released from jail.Daniel does so -- of course. And, naturally, the bag contains something so horrific that it could, quite literally, end the world. Daniel tells us in voiceover that the "refugees from catastrophe will turn Paradise into Hell." But these moral musings lead absolutely nowhere. The besotted Daniel still delivers the package, and Kyril is freed.Daniel ends his relationship with Kyril. But not for long. Several weeks later, bereft, Daniel locates Kyril once again. He loans Kyril a large amount of money and tells him to leave the country. The only caveat is that Daniel asks Kyril to call him "once in a while." Kyril never does, of course.I'm not entirely sure what I'm supposed to have gotten out of this film. The trajectory of Daniel and Kyril's relationship is predictable. Daniel's voiceover narration doesn't provide any insight into Daniel's motivations, and is rather poorly written (perhaps this is due to the English translation, but I doubt it). Cuervo's depiction of Daniel is rather lackluster. He plays Daniel as pathetic and spineless, and it doesn't make for an interesting performance.Perhaps if Daniel were on some personal journey, we'd care more. Perhaps if Kyril weren't such a completely nasty person, we'd care more. Perhaps if Daniel discovered something about himself, the film would be worth watching. Even if the film decided to take the "film noir" track and depict Daniel as caught up by forces beyond his control... Perhaps if the film depicted love as something so powerful and overwhelming that it could not be opposed, even if it led to nuclear holocaust, we'd be more willing to spend 2 hours in the theater. But the film never goes anywhere beyond the standard straight-trade relationship.Compounding the problem is some average cinematography and editing, lackluster production design and unimaginative locale shots. The supporting cast is memorable for the outrageousness of the characters.In the final analysis, "Bulgarian Lovers" contains some stunning eye-candy. The Bulgarians are gorgeous, and most of them get naked at one point or another. But the film's heart and soul is missing. In a way, the film mirrors the very nature of the straight-trade Bulgarian lovers that it depicts: Beautiful, but empty.