How wonderful it is to see this fine actress carry a film and carry it so beautifully.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

I can't remember the last time I saw a film with no redeeming features at all. But I will keep a straight face and say why.This was made before 'Sex and the City', so can be forgiven for some of its, cough, more 'challenging'/embarrassing views on sex. (Oh, the groin-grinding scene. Oh). Congrats on being 'racy', but your movie makes no sense.If we're supposed to witness the sexual revelations of two women, why do it in a spa on holiday, why not in their natural environment, where events can potentially be longer lasting? Why does the main character break up with the musician? It wasn't because he was cloying and desperate; it was because...erm...the sex was too good.The boring blonde character falls for the attendant, who has some scenes where he's doing his job and she reads too much into it. This could've worked, but why does he then fall for her? Because the character needs a love interest and she's so crushingly stupid, the movie has to make one up. Got it.The Vin Man: Oh, oh, oh, Vin Man. He's so ridiculous and creepy, I can cope with laughing AT him. But then we're supposed to sympathise with him, to the extent where we can believe that the main character will end up with him and spawn his children. And how are we asked to do this? We a shown that he is a LONELY ridiculous creep.But, but...The monologues suggest that the play this movie was based on was written by two snotty, pre-pubescent girls who had just gone to see 'The Vagina Monologues' and didn't get it. I won't be in a hurry to look it up.Watching something fail so totally as this film was an entertainment within itself.

Director Genevieve Robert has attempted to make a comedy-drama that makes serious comment about modern day sexual relations, and with "Casual Sex?" she is well wide of the mark.The storyline is very weak (concerning two young girls' search for the perfect guy), while the serious and moral content makes very little impact. Don't be deceived by the title.Finally, the comedy only works very occasionally, but look out for Andrew Dice-Clay in a stand out performance as the 'Vinman'. "Casual Sex?" may have been much better made purely as a send-up of sex in the 80's.Thursday, July 2, 1992 - Video

This is a much better movie than I expected and is very well done with some witty dialogue and good performances by all.Thompson and Jackson play two young women from with different sexual experiences who go off on vacation to find love.Andrew Dice Clay is surprising good as the guy who turns to be the love of Lea's life without either of them expecting it.Not "hokey" at all and the sexual inuendo is far more adult and funnier than you usually saw in the "teen or young couple" flims of this era.

Witty comedy that may not solve the dating problems of the 80's...but does offer a lighter look at what happens in the dark. Also, a slightly tamed look at the "DiceMan," which turns out to be his best screen work.