It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

I have absolutely never seen anything like this movie before. You have to see this movie.

I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.

Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

First off, many reviewers do not understand what a 'B' movie is. It is a cheaply made movie to be shown in tandem (double feature) with an 'A' film, usually in the 1940s and 1950s. Though nowadays is can mean a low-budget indie film.Roger Corman did not make B movies, he made 'Z' movies, as he likes to call them. He would see used film sets and think "I can use those" and then approach the studio in question to use the set before it was taken down, then go to Robert Towne and Jack Nicholson (two of his stalwart writers) and say "I need a script in three days". And Corman did direct and/produce some classics, the cheesy but fun The Raven, The Pit and the Pendulum, The Masque of the Red Death. And of the course the original Little Shop of Horrors. And let's not forget The Intruder, with William Shatner, dealing with segregation and civil rights.After he set up Concorde Anois in Galway, I auditioned for several of his "B" movies. Cheesy and cheap.But back to this film Crash Point Zero, wow, I laughed all the way through it. Cheap tawdry rip-off and I like Treat Williams, but this film, I wonder about my own mental state by watching it all the way through. I suppose I wanted to see what else in the film was going to be ripped off from other films.I am a professional actor and writer, classically trained, and if my agent approached me with this script, I would have asked him if he had taken his Valium.One of the worst films, if it was made deliberately tongue-in-cheek, it worked.

I'm a huge Treat Williams fan but I have to say... this movie sucked. The acting really wasn't bad, I don't blame the actors at all. But all in all the summary leads you to believe that Treat Williams is the hero and he gets involved like no other when in all reality, it's almost shot like there's 5 different stories going on at the same time. It was really hard to enjoy this, a couple of the jokes were pretty good and you can enjoy SOME of the dialogue but for the most part.. this movie was a bit of a joke. If it had been edited much better and perhaps if there was a bit more to the relationship between Agent Jason and Nadia it COULD have passed for an okay movie. Some of the scenes look like they were ripped off some other movie too.. not pleased.

I really don't see why this film gets such sour ratings. This is a low-budget effort, not a mainstream action blockbuster to win over legions. Yes, it uses footage from the Stallone movie "Cliffhanger". This is no secret and was done with legal permission. The director (Jim Wynorski under an alias) was given permission from someone at Columbia Pictures to use the "Cliffhanger" footage, actually that guy and his wife are in Extreme Limits. If you haven't seen Cliffhanger (not that great anyways) you wouldn't notice the footage is from that movie. It's solid footage and wouldn't have been able to film similar original footage with the low-budget allocated for Extreme Limits.I liked the Tesla Death Ray-Tungusta scenario used throughout the plot. It is cheesy to a certain extent, yet it works well as a sci-fi offshoot. As an action film this is above average, especially if you like Jim Wynorski's unique style. I enjoyed it.

Just wanted to add to the comment by Bailey-21(Alabama)...who said "the entire climax of this... is nearly an exact copy of that film (Long Kiss). Frame for frame, it's a pitiful ripoff."If you look at this scene 'Frame by frame', you can actually SEE Geena Davis standing by the truck! this is the SAME FOOTAGE!I wonder if both films were made by the same studio, and they ran out of money on this one, or if this is even legal!I felt Ripped Off!