The Worst Film Ever

That was an excellent one.

Absolutely Fantastic

I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.

So clearly not a movie with a big budget, it's still better than any B movie. Good story, characters and thoroughly engaging. If you can relate to anything in the movie it's even better, and more engaging. I don't know what that other reviewers (2 at this point) are going on and on about. It's simple. Most movies are stupid. The stupidness in this movie is just cuz they aren't playin the smartest guys, so it kinda makes sense. It only makes the movie better.The characters are almost realistic.... ya! Go figure. Clearly the writer/director knows people like the ones portrayed in the film, and there are some crazy and/or scary dudes in the story. They act a lot like the ones I ... uh can't confirm or deny knowing ;) The only thing bad thing is that the bikers seem off, they're kinda whack. But there is reason given for this early on, so.... since the rest of the movie rocks - forgiven! It even shows functional instructions for a rudimentary Y spliff. Amazing. Now I'm going on..If you think it might be your kind of movie, it probably totally is.

I'm usually very annoyed by movies that attempt too hard to be Quentin Tarantino-esque, especially since Tarantino is best known for ripping off other people's stuff, whether it be from the 70s or from foreign films, making his copycats thieves twice removed. But with some good casting, not bad acting and a concept first realized in Cheech and Chong's Up In Smoke (it was a van made out of marijuana in that one), this Candadian flick pulls it off pretty well, delivering something as engaging as a good Hong Kong action flick with the perverse humor of the Pusher trilogy. It starts off like a poor man's District B13 but instead of free running and over the top action we're delivered unique characters who interact in absurd situations reminiscent of Pulp Fiction. The main character, of course, is a toilet made out of heroin, which ends up being splattered with blood as it is carried under one arm through raves, acid trips and a few shoot outs as well. I'm really glad the underdogs just shot dead the really mean evil scary Bonsian kingpins (pulled that off twice in fact) because I can't tell you how many films I've seen during which I've shouted "Just shoot him already!" It was highly satisfying that their actions were dictated by common sense rather than by some sadistic screenwriter's whim. All in all I had a good time watching Gangster Exchange and would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good crime movie.

A really stupid Canadian movie that is assembled from the wreckage of other bad movies that think they're so clever but really aren't.Russell isn't Tom Cruise. Maybe he'd be good enough as Cruise's stunt double? He's just another himbo.I hate that crap like this seems to get made so easily while good movies have to suffer an exhausting process of getting greenlit because of all the morons in the world today.Eating candy and making out in the dark while ignoring this movie is the only reason it should be on around you.The buddy cop thing can work depending on the talents of its actors, but these are all stand-in types who appear to have been promoted into leads. There are good Canadian movies out there, so skip this one.

Christopher Russell as Marco and Nobuya Shimamoto as Hiro make a buddy-buddy pair as appealing as Paul Newman/Robert Redford, and as expectantly to be looked for in the future. Russell has the athletic good looks - and hair! - of Tom Cruise in a role that Cruise would certainly turn down, due to the very unDianetics partying and vendettas. What raises the film to being totally Toronto is not only Marco carrying the drug toilet around with him throughout. But also, what I will not give away to future viewers, the identity of the Japanese-speaking PhD in Chemistry who solves our two friends problems. The Tarantino content of guns-and-drugs is treated in a way that calls for the audiences' complicity. The writer/director gets away from the aristocratic attitude on this subject. This is an ORDINARY PEOPLE'S movie.