Horrible, fascist and poorly acted

Good start, but then it gets ruined

Good concept, poorly executed.

Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

I want my 93 minutes back!! This movie (not withstanding Maeve Quinlans PERFECT breasts ) is absolutely BORING. Musical score and numbers terrible, Screenplay obviously written by a sixth grader, and acting that will leave you wishing for an elementary school production. What was Larry Clark thinking? Oh, wait; obviously he wasn't thinking.

Due to all the controversy that surrounded this film - where I live, in Sweden, posters that advertised the film were actually removed from subway carts as one could see a boy going down on a woman - I have somehow let that silliness seep into my mind; while watching this quite beautiful, mobile still life, I wondered exactly what it was, that made people go insane from this film.I mean, the sexuality is just part of human life, right? The start of the film - no spoilers here - was much more disturbing.Having written that, I really liked this film. It's written by Harmony Korine, which does give some details away. Young persons are on display, seemingly directed by dictator parents, possible exception being Tate, a person who yells at his grandmother and isn't the most sociable character.Interesting throughout, it's a bite of life and a good watch.

a town.few families. teenagers. large slices of sex. mixture between pornography and a kind of cry. or, only, a Rubick cube. it is, in same time, disgusting and cruel.bitter and chaotic. no moral, no message. at first sigh. young bodies and ambiguous story. but it is only a poor picture. because it is only a picture of society. frustrations, fear, lost of life sense, schizoid universe, darkness of soul and fake refugees, result - a honest film. too honest because it may be ironic drawing of every day facts, warning or only cold mirror. a difficult film for its bitter skin. because eroticism, at all levels, with each nuances is only a form to sensibles. or a trap. only the viewer has right answer. for himself.

This film bored me to death. In a word, it's crap. It's a film that tries to be controversial by delving into the lives of a few teenagers. I'd love to know how many average looking boys really get to have sex with their girlfriend's hot mum. Unconvincing to say the least. I found the film very slow to get into, and was a bit confused at the start as to where the film was leading. I suppose the only character in the film worth watching was Tate, the others bored me (sorry for the repetition). Larry Clar has obviously tried to use a number of ways to 'shock' his audience but I would say he's ultimately failed. The slow deliverance and stereotypical teenage sex, drugs and rock and roll life style made me want to fall asleep.