I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Fantastic!

The acting in this movie is really good.

It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

One word to describe this: forgettable.I would've been disappointed had I paid to watch this, but since I didn't - there isn't much to complain about. Waste of time? Yeah, a bit. Pointless movie to be brutally honest.It's a very typical rom-com. Very formulaic and predictable. I might also add that it was surprisingly unfunny for a comedy. I didn't laugh once.Even with such a star-studded cast, it failed to make an impression. Everyone starring in this movie are usually great actors (and you gotta say that the acting was above-average), but the bad script/dialogue makes one wonder why they agreed to star in such a turkey.I liked Jordana Spiro in this. I thought she was most convincing in her role. Everyone was good, like I said. So, basically, the only thing going for this movie, is the talented cast.Perhaps 40+ divorcees, who are trying internet dating, might be able to relate to this... then again... maybe not. I wasn't.

A forty-something preschool teacher (Diane Lane) looks to the personals for a change of pace and a relationship, with hilarious results.I should probably rate this even lower, but I'm a sucker for John Cusack and enjoy watching him even in movies I do not generally enjoy. As other reviewers have noted ,the two leads do a fine job but are in a less-than-great movie. That sums it up nicely. Even by romantic comedy standards, this is pretty bland and not even much of a comedy.Christopher Plummer adds a bit of charm. It seems like he really came into his own as an older actor. I now find it hard to picture him as anything but a man in his later years full of class and wit.

Must Love Dogs a romantic comedy that stars Diane Lane and John Cusack.Based on Claire Cook's novel,it tells a story of Sarah Nolan,a mid-thirties woman that finds his dream relationship and the perfect man that every woman has dreamed of after suffering from an emotional crises that was brought about by a divorce that occurred a few months back.Gary David Goldberg directed the movie.Sarah Nolan is a kindergarten teacher who just suffered from a divorce eight months ago.Her sisters, Christine and Carol encourage her to date once again.Despite being unsure and uncertain,she posted her photo and profile in the internet.She meets many men in the process but in the end,she is left to decide between Jake,a smart and good-looking man who brings along a dog for their walks; and Bob,a divorced father of one of her students.This was definitely a childish and silly romantic comedy as it went through the situations and the emotions of the character especially Sarah in an immature manner.Added to that,it was also clichéd and predictable from beginning to end.The comedic scenes also barely elicits any laughter as it was so slapstick and some were even corny.It would have been a worthless enterprise if not for the talent of the lead cast particularly Lane and Cusack despite the fact that they probably are just simply going through the motions of it.Overall,it was far from being average film that one could probably not worry about missing it.

An incredibly weak, predictable, drab and forced comedy. Hollywood loves churning out this contrived and unoriginal garbage. In fact, I'm surprised Jennifer Aniston wasn't in the lead role. It's exactly her kind of movie. A little into the story, I groaned and said said to my fellow viewers "I'll bet they are going to break into a pretend, warm and fuzzy family group-hug song at some point." And guess what? It happened! It was mortifying. It's especially bad when the actors look uncomfortable doing it and you can tell that they know they are filming a sure-fire flop.John Cusack looked like he'd rather be somewhere else - zero chemistry with Diane Lane. It must have been a paycheck for him. Unfortunately, that's happened with a lot of his movies in the past 10 or more years.