the audience applauded

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.

This so called "film" is a JOKE. Not one good moment, not one good piece of acting, or one piece of evidence that Creep Creepersin has talent, because believe me this is the worst piece of effort ever put on the internet AND DVD, I kid you not. Let me count out the problems with this movie. Lack of effort or time put in this masterpiece? Check. Producers and make up artists so lazy that Creepersin has to use footage from NOTLD to back up the fact that he has no talent? Check. Long opening AND closing credits that annoy you? Check. A boob shot only put on the cover just for views and to feel horny but you felt like you were touched in the wrong places? Check. Laughably bad acting? Check. Overuse of sound quality once it goes from annoying to extremely annoying? Check.The sad thing is, a title like that spells failure, as it comes to common knowledge the only zombies we get is just footage from a better movie, like Night of the Living Dead, not kidding, and the whole slasher isn't so gory to the point that the director doesn't have talent. It's also the first film to be shot in EIGHT F--CKING HOURS. Yes. Creepersin would have taken the time to make a good zombie film with action packed scenes and decent makeup, that way the movie would look potential. But the director, as talentless as Ulli Lommel or David DeCoteau, he wanted this film done and rushed, just to be known as the first film to be shot in eight hours. If you want to spend eight hours filming something, make a freaking short film, not this dragged, poor effort, lazy attempt at a Horror movie with the running time of 69 minutes, which the film is half movie, half opening and ending credits, and footage from NOTLD.

I wish I owned a copy of this on DVD just so I could snap the disc into two pieces and burn them (each one, about as worthwhile as this waste) and then flush the ashes down the toilet. Opening shots are cropped to show as much of the babe's cleavage as possible. Then we see her taking a leak, before apparently being killed, off-screen. Oh, brother.....I've said in a couple of other reviews, that I hate it when the opening credits are superimposed over point-of-view shots of someone driving, which is what we next see here. I look out the window on my way to and from work everyday, why the bloody hell do I want to watch a so-called movie of the same? Opening POV credits run from 4 minutes, to 12 minutes into this thing. Slash nearly eight minutes off the 69 minutes run time and we're already down to a run time of only 61 minutes.Cute girls, but I can go to any bar to see that. Speaking of bars, almost this entire flick takes place in one bar, probably after it had closed one night, before the sun came up the next morning. And they had the ugliest girls in this thing making out, why? And why were the scenes of Night Of The Living Dead thrown in at random? Eliminate those five or six minutes from the run time, and we're left with about a 56 minutes long run time.Most of the remainder is just these losers hanging out in a small bar, babbling.The film proper ends at 54 minutes, with the remainder of its 69 minute run time spent on the lengthy closing credits (in which the filmmakers put numerous, poorly spelt jokes) and showing Night Of The Living Dead! Which brings its overall run time down to about 42 minutes.42 minutes of homophobic, unfunny, amateurish diarrhea.And incidentally, THERE WERE NO ZOMBIES in this so-called Zombietown!

Well where to start. An unborn baby with a used teabag in a desert could've produced a better film than this.You know it's a bad zombie film when you don't see any zombies at all, expect for the bits he stole from the Night of the Living Dead. The plot is deriving towards non-existent, the sound quality is just terrible (There is one scream that he uses over and over again), the actors are the worst I have ever seen (that's including any Youtube footage) and you have to suffer the long opening and closing credits.I'm surprised that this film is even on this website and not on the absolute bottom.

Not much it seems. The genre says "comedy/horror". Im pretty sure this genre represent the worse of the worst when it comes to low budget films. Most low budget films are horror but when they turn out really bad you add them to "comedy" and hope some people will laugh because its so horribly bad. Im not even sure I can rate it as other movies since its just stuff put on tape. Of course even the title gave a hint that this would be a bad movie but I expected at least some nice nude scenes or something. There was an attempt at a nude scene where a topless girl pose in a bar with some sort of hockey mask but it would've taken a hell of a lot more to lift this movie from a firm "1".Rated as a low budget horror movie: 1