The Children of Huang Shi
The Children of Huang Shi
R | 03 July 2008 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
The Children of Huang Shi Trailers View All

About young British journalist, George Hogg, who with the assistance of a courageous Australian nurse, saves a group of orphaned children during the Japanese occupation of China in 1937.

Reviews
Laikals

The greatest movie ever made..!

NekoHomey

Purely Joyful Movie!

Infamousta

brilliant actors, brilliant editing

Sameeha Pugh

It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

View More
ma-cortes

Gripping and intense film depicting terrible deeds during Japonese invasion in Shangai and Nanjing (1937) . After that, at the city take place violations, mutilations, and massacres. Some prisoners are interred in a prison camp but later they are led to fire squad, scaffold and alive burying. Later on , an orphaned children group escapes led by the journalist named George Hogg (Jonathan Rhys Meyers), a nurse (Radha Mitchell) and a communist Chinese (Choe Yun Fat).Director de-glamorizes war showing true horror and terrible events . It's a staggering evocation of the Chinese Holocausto in Nanjing , as the atrocities are depicted matter of factly as by-product of sheer Japanese evil. The opening twenty minutes in which the reporter appears as hidden observer turns out to be a graphic depiction the facing off is , on its own, and is magnificent . As the exciting beginning results to be pretty stirring , the developing of the movie regarding invasion China is partially similar to ¨Empire of the sun¨ and suffering of the children on the escape is really moving . The starring, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, and the rest of the cast are excellent , as the movie is powered by splendid performances in charge of American and Chinese actors who during filming suffered some inevitable pains for the hard environment . Filmed in perfect color by cameraman Zhao , reflecting appropriately the Chinese scenarios . Spottiswoode makes a breathtaking work which directs spectacularly with groundbreaking scenes in a heartbreaking context . He dedicated long time joining information and interviewing experts for that scenes would adequate to reality of events. This masterpiece finally didn't garner the world attention and respect that the story deserve and had a regular box office . The motion picture is acceptably directed by Robert Spottiswoode who realizes a spectacular and impressive production. He's a successful director from TV movies and cinema, as terror genre(Terror train), adventures(Air America,Shoot to kill), Scif-Fi (6th day), James Bond film(Tomorrow never dies), and his best movie is ¨Under fire¨.The film is based on actual events about George Hogg , a courageous British reporter , who along with a brave nurse saves a group of orphaned children during the Japanese occupation of China in 1937, these are the following : George Aylwin Hogg (1915-July 22, 1945) was an English adventurer. He was a graduate of Oxford University in economics. He is known as a hero in China for helping New Zealander Rewi Alley save 60 orphaned boys during the Second Chinese-Japanese War, including leading them 700 miles (1,100 km) through dangerous mountain passes, escaping the approaching Japanese secret police in the Shaanxi area .Hogg then decided to relocate the boys to Shandan in Gansu Province 700 miles (1,100 km) away. The first half (33) left in November 1944 and in January 1945, the remaining 27 boys followed. They traveled heavily snow-covered mountain roads by foot. After a month of travel by foot, 450 miles (720 km), they arrived in Lanzhou.Hogg hired six diesel trucks to complete the trip. Early March 1945, Hogg and his boys arrived in Shandan. Alley rented some old temples, turned them into classrooms and workshops, and appointed Hogg as headmaster .

View More
sddavis63

George Hogg was a British journalist in the 1930's who managed to get into Nanjing during the Japanese occupation of China, and who witnessed examples of Japanese atrocities while he was there. Circumstances led him to an orphanage, where he took it upon himself to keep the 60 or so children in the orphanage safe from the Japanese by eventually leading them on a 1000 kilometre hike to a place of safety on the edge of the Gobi Desert.There are a few scattered scenes of excitement here, revolving mostly around the Japanese. Those scenes are well done, with some especially well portrayed strafing runs by Japanese fighter planes against civilian targets. For the most part, though, this is not an exciting movie. It's a worthy movie. It's a story that deserves to be told. Jonathon Rhys Meyers was quite believable as Hogg, and there's a great depiction of China - all the way from the scenery along the way as the group journeys, to some reflection (probably not enough) on the tensions between the Communists and the Nationalists, who worked out an uneasy alliance with each other to defeat the Japanese during the occupation.The movie seemed to me a bit too long. In particular, after the opening few minutes, when the Japanese atrocity in Nanjing occurs, the next hour or so until the journey begins is quite slow going. Overall, though, this is a good tribute to George Hogg, and I especially liked the very moving reflections offered as the closing credits rolled by some of the orphans (now adults) who shared their memories.

View More
jimigorilla2000

This could have been such a great movie if the makers had not taken so many liberties with a story which neither needs nor deserves it. The story of George Hogg and Rewi Alley, a communist from New Zealand, who saved 60 orphans from the ravages of the Second World War by taking them on a 1,100 km trek across mountainous terrain is truly inspirational. Why Alley, the true leader of the expedition, had to be replaced by an American nurse with a drug problem is anybody's guess. Probably to add romantic interest to the story, because just about the only thing the film makers deem interesting enough during the epic journey across the mountains is the fact the leading man and lady finally hit the sack together. When will they ever learn? Trying to sell this as a 'true' should be punishable by a fine which matches the eventual profits, DVD sales included. Other reviewers have remarked how little attention the actual children get in a movie that is called "Children of Huang Shi", so I won't go into that. All in all 3 stars for the often stunning photography.

View More
timsnoek

OK, so this story is based on true events, I can see why someone would like this story to be told. But why didn't they work with good writers, this story is cut in little pieces, cliché upon cliché and then tight together to make one piece out of it. The actors really don't know what to do with the lines they get and the director really didn't know what he wanted to tell. Is this a hero-story? Is this a love-story? Is this a historic adventure? Is this a war-story? I give one example: in the beginning of the story, the love-interest (Mitchell) is talking to the hero (Meyers) about how important it is that she is around, being a nurse, and knows that one scratch can lead to an infection and to death. So she tells that she cleans the wounds and tells the patient how important it is to do this as quick as possible, even if 'it's just a scratch'. Later on in the movie Meyers cuts himself when he's working on replacing a tire and tells Mitchell 'it's just a scratch'. And she SMILES at him.What the f?!! Wasn't she supposed to clean this wound as she told all those people she nursed in the war to do so they wouldn't die? Guess what happens to Meyers... And actually it's her fault I yelled at the screen annoyed.and please, don't even mention the monologues the actors get to work with during the movie. Even a first year scriptwriters school student would do better in writing them. So cliché and predictable. I pity the actors - they must have read the script before they said yes. Why did they accept such bad writing? They probably needed the money. The sceneries are beautiful, Michelle Yeoh has the best part and is the only actor that I believed. (maybe because she didn't have that many lines?). I'm afraid those are the only things that worked out well. The story is fabricated and doesn't have a nice flow, the actors really have difficulties working the lines they get from the writers and clearly the director didn't know what he wanted to do with this story.If it wasn't for the beautiful settings, and the fact that you could sense there was (somewhere) a story worth telling, it would have been a total waste of time watching this movie. Well it definitely was a waste of money making it, I would read the book if I were you.

View More