Stylish but barely mediocre overall

Good concept, poorly executed.

It is not only a funny movie, but it allows a great amount of joy for anyone who watches it.

This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.

Don't you hate it when you purposely lower your expectations in order to avoid disappointment, and come to find out, it's all been for nothing? As a desensitized lover of B-horror of the 70's, Master Of Evil actually sounded decent enough. Decent enough for the guy who enjoyed The Chooper, at least. Yes, Master Of Evil is cheesy, and yes it's low-budget, and yes, it would technically be in that "so bad it's good" category, but no, I did not enjoy Master Of Evil. I can overlook a lot, but non-stop boring is a lot to ask. These guys offer us nothing but conversations, arguments, some little satanist-mascot guy, and very little story to speak of. Concerning a group of Satanists who party often, in a castle owned by their leader, Laval Blessing, a smug, yet confident young fellow, with hair that's way too long, and way too curly for his own good. Blessing unsuccessfully tries to set up satanic orgies, but you got to, at least admire the guy's ambition. Eventually, Laval upsets everyone, making them split, with his deep satanic knowledge and whatnot. Later on, Blessing conjures up an incredibly fake-looking devil thing, which possesses a few unfortunates, and kills a few more. An epic, indeed. Oh yeah, our pal. Gunnar Hansen shows up, as if it matters. For something with a similar vibe, with (a little) more life, check out Werewolves On Wheels. Ultimately, Master Of Evil screams dead acting, incoherent dialog, characters with seemingly no purpose, a grainy, murky look to everything, a typically unfitting score, and of course, a ridiculously outlandish devil monster, with glowing red eyes (usually)... well, now that I put it like that, it sounds pretty damn good. Maybe I spoke too harshly earlier, Master Of Evil ain't bad, check it out! 5/10

When I first encountered THE DEMON LOVER I despised it and posted a bomb movie review -- three stars, which from me is pretty grim news -- but have since come to know & respect the film more over a few more viewings and a little more time. Also a little more familiarity with the whole low budget indie American horror scene from the 1970s, of which THE DEMON LOVER is actually a pretty competent example. I might even say I've sort of developed an affinity to it, partly due to some of the behind the camera talent responsible for the film.Namely Dennis and Robert Skotak, whom literally EVERYBODY has seen the work of by now. You'd have to be someone like my mom to not have seen TERMINATOR 2 or ALIENS or any of the dozens of high profile huge budget entertainments the Skotak's helped to visualize as production designers & creators of visual effects. They were nothing short of pioneers in the realm of science fiction horror action cinema and this is their first feature movie. They made the Demon costume with the glowing lights who looks like the bass player from Gwar, the gore effects, magic effects sequences and likely shot the gory still photos used in the film's police procedural subplot.In 1978 they may have just been a couple of talented punks looking to channel their creativity, but soon after THE DEMON LOVER was released they got jobs working at Roger Corman's New World studios, came into contact with another Corman employee named James Cameron, and worked with him on ALIENS, TERMINATOR 2 and TITANIC. Pwned! And co-director Donald G. Jackson went on to an illustrious career as a B movie maverick, producing the riotous HELL COMES TO FROGTOWN amongst other amphibiously themed schlock delights. Great things come from the most unlikely places sometimes.The one lesson I have learned over the years by studying low budget filmmaking is that you can't fault a movie for being made when it was & under the conditions it was made. That's not fair. However it came about they made the film and merely contrasting it unfavorably to other more well known or successful examples of the form doesn't get anyone anywhere. In it's own way THE DEMON LOVER is just as amusing & clever as other films of its like; CHILDREN SHOULDN'T PLAY WITH DEAD THINGS, BLOOD SABBATH, and ENTER THE DEVIL come to mind.It doesn't have the scope of THE DEVIL'S RAIN nor the thrills per minute ratio of RACE WITH THE DEVIL but instead tries to pay more attention to the occult angle without a large scale production getting in the way. Christmas Robbins is effective as the wannabe warlock who actually manages to evoke Mephistopholes even though nobody seems to believe him, and Tom Hutton does a better job as the polyester jacketed homicide cop assigned to a slew of murders than I recall from sitting through the film first time out. His baffled expressions are non-acting on the highest order.The film's greatest claim to fame is the presence of horror icon Gunnar Hansen as "Professor Peckinpah" in the film's most outrageous appropriation of names for it's characters. There's also a Frazetta, a Romero, and I believe I heard the name Leone at one point. The delivery of the film is just as unsubtle as the appropriation of names and its charm lies not so much in the execution as it does in the reckless abandon in the creative act at work here. The film has clumsy little homages to Dirty Harry movies & spaghetti westerns, and even manages to work in a bizarre little splatter bloodbath ending that seems to have been inspired by TAXI DRIVER.Sure, it's low budget kitsch really, a point I missed the first time through when expecting the film to be as straight up as it looked. There's a decided lack of artistry to the cinematography but an abundance of energy that makes up for it. If nothing else here's a chaotic little bit of mayhem for aspiring filmmakers to study to see how to make a passable little horror movie on the ultra cheap. These guys were determined to see the film as they were able to make it right then & there, and it actually does amount to an absorbing hour or so for fans of this kind of material. Perfect drive-in movie nonsense.And for the record I've encountered three different forms of this movie so far. Unicorn Video has the standard fullscreen version running just 70 minutes but it turns out there's some graphic carnage removed from it's print and some of its dialog scenes have been shortened. Severin Films apparently copped a Unicorn tape for their DVD presentation, which is to be expected I guess, and my verdict is to avoid it & get the real thing. Then there's another North American tape titled COVEN that has some footage removed from the very beginning but more of the gore clipped out of Unicorn's print, and also comes it at just around 70 minutes fullscreen with a rougher picture quality than Unicorn. But the real gem is a British made pre-cert PAL format tape running 72 minutes in a widescreen 1:85:1 ratio with all of the mayhem intact. Worth tracking down.5/10

Under-the-barrel raunch involving the usual wild-for-kicks teens...this time around they're a strange mottle resembling old-school Black Sabbath fans, and their audacious dabblings in black magic parenthetically unharness an ancient bloodthirsty demon. This financially underprivileged drive-in bombast is a showboat of laughably deficient capacities...not for one meteoric instant is DEMON LOVER indicative of professional contribution to any aspect of its barnyard production. Even by the casual standards of 70s era drive-in trash it's a wondrous botch, and a veritable Faberge Egg for any fan of golden-age filmschlock. Interestingly, the dubious "mountain in labor" origins of this celluloid poopstain were the subject of DEMON LOVER DIARY, a spectacular film-document which is cardinal viewing for anyone interested in the bizarre universe of impecunious ground-level movie-making. 3.5/10

I first rented this movie at college, and expected so much more than I got. Hansen is the only member of the cast who can act, and despite an OK storyline, the cheap, amateurish production quickly sinks the film.