I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Lack of good storyline.

It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

History or hoax? Fact or fiction? Tony Robinson acts as the presenter of a thorough study about the facts that we presented in Dan Brown's bestselling novel,"Da Vinci Code" in this documentary entitled "The Real Da Vinci Code". After novelist Dan Brown claimed that all the historical facts that were presented in his bestselling novel are true,this documentary presents a research of what it has found out by conducting a research of its own and interviewing different respected Bible scholars.In addition to that,Robinson comes to different locations such as France,United Kingdom,Scotland,Italy,Spain and Israel as it presents what it has found out in comparison to the facts presented in the "The Da Vinci Code" such as Jesus being married to Mary Magdalene,Jesus having a bloodline which is known as the Holy Grail,the truth behind the Priory of Scion,Knights Templar,Rosslyn Chapel and Leonardo Da Vinci's painting "The Last Supper" which allegedly revealed a secret from which the title of Dan Brown's novel was taken from.Surprisingly Michael Baigent,one of the three authors of "Holy Blood Holy Grail" from which Dan Brown took his inspiration in writing Da Vinci Code,discussed with Robinson about allegedly the secret that the Roman Catholic Church has kept for centuries about Jesus being married and having descendants.No question that this was an informative documentary about the search for the Holy Grail.It also proves accuracy in its research about the facts presented in Dan Brown's bestselling novel.One would surely enjoy it especially interviews with Dr. Elaine Pagels about the Gnostic Gospels particularly about the truth behind Mary Magdalene as one of the intimate disciples of Jesus and far from prostitute as Pope Gregory XII claimed centuries ago.They also try to study on whether Jesus was indeed married.Overall,the viewer will be provided of another insight about the facts presented in "The Da Vinci Code".

The bread depicted in the show's enactment of the Last Supper is clearly leavened bread. However, the Last Supper is known to have been a Passover Seder, an ancient ceremony commemorating the Exodus, at which only unleavened bread is allowed by ancient Jewish law. Jesus the man was a devout Jew, believed to have been influenced by an ascetic sect known as the Essenes. His action at the Temple with the money changers demonstrated his belief that the official Jewish religion, run by the priestly caste, had drifted too far from God's commandments and was corrupt. The wafers used at the Eucharist are made of unleavened bread.Seder meal tradition, handed down in age-old eastern European Jewish (Ashkenazi) custom, includes a decorated wine cup (often silver) used in the Seder service. The engravings on the cup typically are Jewish symbols, such as the Star of David. If the cup used at the Last Supper was so decorated, the later Church as it evolved from the original disciples, was antithetical to the Jewish religion. If the Seder cup was the Grail, wouldn't it have been likely that the Church did not want an object with Jewish symbols reminding their congregants that the original church came from a Jewish sect? Again, if the Grail was a Seder cup, it would not likely to have been jewel encrusted. That is not the tradition passed down in Jewish custom as I have seen it. Furthermore, Jesus did not approve of individual wealth. He would rather that individual wealth go to charity than to purchasing jewels.IMDb has no writer listed for this program except that Dan Brown is listed under that category with the word "novel" next to his name. The television program itself does have a writer listed at the end of the program among titles that are quickly displayed as Tony Robinson is talking. A separate researcher is also listed.

It had actually took me a long time to 'dig out' from my own memory that this is the first-ever documentary I had watched in regarding to The Da Vinci Code. The very first one which introduces me to the phenomenon which has been taking the world by storm when this documentary was on air here last year.Because to actually admit, prior to this documentary where I watched it by chance on television here, I had actually never even heard of the book. Not yet. But I had heard how much buzz it has caused, and the controversy as well. So, I had never regretted watching this.It was very interesting how the host himself went in search of the Holy Grail because practically about everything it is trying to find out about on the documentary is almost new to me then (as being a non-Christian myself). At that time I was just pretty amused in the way he presented the show. Or maybe I was just this clueless person who is oblivious to the phenomenon till all that buzz came in.Now a year on, I had already read the book, watched the movie adaptation and liked it, even did some personal research on my own mainly online. So I guess I can say this documentary where I watched it last year is pretty not that bad in the way it has presented to those who are watching it.

Tony Robinson is mostly known for his comedy work in stuff like "Black Adder". This work was the first time I ever saw him in a serious piece, and a documentary at that. It was a very positive surprise. Tony (and his invisible researches) takes a look at the roots behind the myths in the bestseller book "Da vinci code". He hunts for the holy grail and examines some of the places in the book and also looks for the basis of some holy grail myth. Robinson manages to cover a lot of ground. This is a high class documentary, boring historians are given space, but it never gets boring because somehow the boring parts are edited out. This documentary is almost as fast-paced as the book. Well worth watching, I have seen it three times, twice before and once after reading the book. My only complaint is that they did not dig deep enough in some places.