Waste of time

Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??

A Disappointing Continuation

The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

The Tempest is a beautiful tale set in the enchanting, vivid panorama of an island holding Prospero, his daughter Miranda and the respective consequences when usurped by a congregation of ship waders. What struck me most was the allusion in the end to Shakespeare's own seclusion from play-writing and the feeling of emptiness and dolor at being forgotten by his own patrons after his decline.This version strictly focuses on the performances and the theatricality of the play. The film has no artistic vision. The island seems empty and desolate, which seems incongruous since Prospero is a magician. The adaptation also never touches the soul, it manages to stay complacent and prosaic mainly because everyone is acting.However, the performances are commendable, especially from Pippa Guard, Michael Hordern, Andrew Sachs and Warren Clarke. Though the play itself acts supercilious in conveying the emotions and the performances lack the emotional intensity (In Sophie;s Choice, Meryl Streep gave a consummate effort by including all aspects of a performance. Everything was perfect yet imperfect since she just let out all the inner feelings of an actor at the right time i.e the Choice scene where she did the genius work of not improvising). Here everything looks improvised, meticulously done and relied on the vastly spectacular script by the veteran Shakespeare. Its still beautiful as the screenplay is original (thank God there was no sloppy editing). Nigel Hawthorne unfortunately did not seem to be drunk in any way, just a deluded, pompous butler. But Andrew Sachs cleverly played Trinculo. Pippa Guard gave her best shot and so did Michael Horden. Warren Clarke played an egregious, sycophantic and contemptible Caliban spot-on, especially that silly dance sequence where his ghastly steps seemed apt for the loathsome monster. Others were forgettable and Christopher Guard was unforgivably bad and clumsily dazed. Ariel's character was a shocker (a flesh-colored dress would have been better) and so was the dance of the spirits, that was uncomfortable. 8 out of 10.

Shakespeare's TEMPEST is magical, romantic, and full of delight. But the center of the play is the dynamic between Prospero, the wise old wizard, and his innocent but adventurous daughter Miranda.Pippa Guard is PERFECT as Miranda. She captures all of Miranda's sweetness and gentleness while adding courage and spirit and passion and even daring to the surface obedience she always displays. Watch the famous scene where Prospero talks on and on about his past and his great gifts and his magical plans to bring them home. At the end of his long-winded speech, he prevents Miranda from asking any further questions by waving his magic wand and sending her to sleep! It's a scene that often makes modern audiences groan aloud. But Pippa Guard has the most extraordinary gift for putting a world of passion and deep feeling into her face as she opens her mouth to protest. Her magnificent spirit is fully displayed, even though she has no verbal comeback to Prospero's manipulative magic. Even the surprised, confused, and then suddenly very sleepy look on her face cannot conceal her growing strength and her rebellious desire to know more.Pippa Guard is the model Shakespearean actress -- rendering the language beautifully and adding a world of meaning with just a single look or a glance.Pippa Guard Rocks!

I love The Tempest as a play - its magic, its fun, its emotional impact. All these should be present in a good adaptation.The problem with this version is twofold. First, it is very studio-bound, giving a feeling of flatness to the proceedings (compare to the Derek Jarman version a year earlier, or the 1950s version with Maurice Evans). Second, it suffers from inappropriate casting in key roles, notably real-life siblings Pippa and Christopher Guard as lovers Miranda and Ferdinand, and David Dixon as Ariel (the potential was there but it just didn't work).Michael Hordern is however fine as Prospero, and Nigel Hawthorne and Andrew Sachs provide some comedy. Warren Clarke is a monstrous and diverting Caliban, devoid of magic but with some sense of the injustice he feels at his treatment on the island.Some clever ideas and some very good scenes (notably when the goddesses appear, singing), but this Tempest is too dry and flat to be really engrossing.

This must the worst move I've ever seen! I thought that by the fact that it said BBC on the cover, that it had to have some kind of quality or at least be ok. This is ridiculous! some excuse it must get since it was made in 1980 but still. To actually dress up the air and water sprites in thong and cover them with baby oil and glitter is not the best way to take a dramatic play of Shakespeare seriously. The one actor I could actually watch without getting attacks of laughter was the drunken servant! And the scenography looked like it had been brought in from a school play. Everything look as if it were made of papier-maché! well maybe I do ought to recommend it after all, not if you want to see a good Shakespearian play but if you would like to get hysterical laughter attacks from oiled men in thongs crawling over each other...erh...wait a minute...was this a PG-13 movie? I think not....