Terrible acting, screenplay and direction.

Better Late Then Never

n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

Historic drama about The Virgin Queen which focuses on the stormy relationship between the aging Queen and Sir Walter Raleigh . A talky slice of history with Bette Davis as stubborn Queen , whose love affair , jealousy with Raleigh led to his downfall . Well played by Davis who stole the acting honors at a resolute , strong , glamour-skimping characterisation , to give the illusion of baldness, Bette shaved her head two inches in front to show a high forehead under Elizabeth's red wigs, and addition , also performed by swashbuckling champ Richard Tood as an obstinate Raleigh . Elizabeth had learnt her political lessons in the years of intrigue before she became Queen, she was a brilliant stateswoman, managing a succession of parliaments so that she was loved as well as obeyed. Elizabeth I managed to set Great Britain to ruling and gloryfy amidst public and private confusion and she sets in motion a merciless plan to protect her people and preserve her throne . This good historic drama recreates the wars , loves ,turmoil and struggle for power . It explores her last period : from her days of old age when is besieged by court intrigues and political machination as Qeen of France Catalina of Medicis , her fear as a potential victim from Irish people ; into her years of triumph ; and her last, enigmatic relationship with her young protégé , Raleigh . Walter overcomes court intrigue from Sir Christopher Hatton (Robert Douglas) to win favor with the Queen in order to get financing for a proposed voyage to the New World . As Raleigh wants ships to sail and make a name for England and being helped by Robert Dudley , Lord Leicester (Herbert Marshall) . A young ward of the court, Beth Throgmorton (Joan Collins who is the secret object of Raleigh's true affections) , is strongly attracted to Raleigh and goes back the attraction . Elizabeth I's love for William Raleigh threatens to destroy her kingdom . The Virgin Queen managed to restore England glory and power amidst private and public turmoil . This period drama frames the tumultuous affair between Queen Elizabeth and William Raleigh , dealing with a depiction of the love/hate among them . Bette is top-notch in the title role of this passable drama focusing on the life of known Queen . In this her second acting as Elizabeth and considered to be ever better than hist first in ¨The private lives of Elizabeth and Essex¨ by Michael Curtiz . Seeking the most authenticity , Bette shaved the front of her head and eyebrows and insisted on ugly bags under her eyes , she later complained that they never grew back properly and that ever after she had to draw them in with an eyebrow pencil. The stalwart Richard Todd plays rightly as Sir Raleigh , while Joan Collins gives a mediocre acting as the lady-in-waiting with whom he falls in love . However , the film relies heavily on the relationship between Elizabeth/Raleigh and Beth Throgmorton/Raleigh , resulting to be slightly tiring . Colorful cinematography in CinemaScope by Charles Clarke as well as magnificent production design , both of them add a spectacular ambient to the ancient atmosphere but it does help to know some history in order to keep the plot and plotters straight . Furthermore , an evocative and sensitive musical score by Franz Waxman . The motion picture was professionally directed by Henry Koster , an expert on super-productions and epic biographies , such as he proved in ¨Desiree¨, ¨The Virgin Queen¨, ¨A man called Peter¨, The story of Ruth¨ , ¨The Naked Maja¨ and of course ¨The Robe¨ , his greatest success. Other films about this historical character are the followings : The classical rendition titled ¨The private lives of Elizabeth and Essex¨ (1939) by Michael Curtiz with Bette Davis and Errol Flynn dealing with her life through her great love affair Essex ; ¨Elizabeth¨ by Shakahar Kapur with Cate Blanchett , Geoffrey Rush , Joseph Fiennes , a story full sweep of Queen's life . And for television : ¨Elizabeth R¨ (1972) by Herbert Wise with Glenda Jackson and Peter Jeffreys ; ¨Elizabeth the Queen¨(1968) by George Schaefer with Judith Anderson and Charlton Heston ; finally TV series ¨Elizabeth¨(2005) by Tom Hooper with Anna Marie Duff , Sienna Guillory and Ian Hart , and ¨Elizabeth I¨ TV miniseries with Helen Mirren , Hugh Dancy and Jeremy Irons .

As always, Bette Davis gives it her all with her outbursts and moments of compassion. Unfortunately, the writing of the film leaves a lot to be desired. It basically deals with Sir Walter Raleigh getting on the good side of Davis's Elizabeth so as to get ships and money to go out to the new world. The film is basically confined to the queen's palace and there is also so much history out there which is conveniently ignored. Spain and France are mentioned as a matter of fact.Sometimes Davis sounded even comical with a voice comparable to Apple Annie (Pocketful of Miracles-1961) and Baby Jane, the great Davis thriller of 1962. These combined with a British accent are entertaining to say the least. Davis, as always, has that commanding presence. Unfortunately, the film did not. There is a good performance by Joan Collins, a lady-in-waiting who weds Raleigh, earnestly played by Richard Todd. Note Herbert Marshall in an obscure role as an Earl who introduces Raleigh to the queen. How grand Marshall and Davis were in 1941's "The Little Foxes."

.....he was such a stupid git.That's what John Lennon sings in "I'm so tired" !But that's what's the Virgin Queen could have said of a man who was not afraid to challenge her even -for he is noble and chivalrous- if it's for Madam the Queen's glory.Koster's directing is static and unexciting and if the movie is interesting ,all the credit is due to the actors:Bette Davis was unique and irreplaceable ;her portrayal is so stunning we've got the strange feeling to see the real queen as she was .Richard Todd was used to this kind of aristocratic characters:the following year ,he would be Axel Fersen,opposite Michele Morgan's "Marie-Antoinette,Reine de France" by Jean Delannoy.And Joan Collins provides adequate if not outstanding support.

This film is not great, but it is also undeservedly forgotten. Think of Elizabeth I and Bette Davis and everyone recalls THE PRIVATE LIVES OF ELIZABETH AND ESSEX, the Warner Brothers film with Davis and Errol Flynn made in 1939. This film, made in the middle 1950s (when Davis's career was on a downturn)has Richard Todd, a better actor than Flynn but not with half of the latter's charm and charisma. Also the plot is listless. Basically it should be called WHEN SIR WALTER CAME TO COURT, because it is how Raleigh enters Elizabeth's court and rises to her attention. But aside from his rivalry with Sir Christopher Hatton (Robert Douglas, in a well performed semi-villain role), which leads to the death of Dan O'Herlihy (Raleigh's friend) there is no tension in the plot - even with Joan Collins as a youthful beauty at court who becomes Elizabeth's rival.The real problem is the script writer did not know what to do with the project. ELIZABETH AND ESSEX was based (for better or worse) on a popular play of the time by Maxwell Anderson. It detailed the tragic relationship of the elderly Queen and her youthful lover, who was too hot-headed and too ambitious. It ends with Essex's rebellion of 1601, and his execution which (one can see) destroys the Queen as well. There was plenty of tension in that film, and one of the joys of it is watching how from the start every character knows how to play Essex's headstrong behavior against him. He literally destroys himself, taking his monarch with him.Raleigh's character appeared in that film (Vincent Price played the role) as a rival of Essex. And they were rivals. But Essex, aside from some fitful abilities as a military leader, had nothing in him. Raleigh and Robert Cecil (Essex two successful adversaries) were gifted in various ways: Cecil was a brilliang politician and statesman, and Raleigh a gifted poet, writer, and explorer of the New World. While Essex has never been forgotten, most people are better acquainted with Raleigh (who eventually became a political martyr as well - being executed for treason in 1618 when King James I was "disappointed" that Raleigh's South American explorations did not bring in the gold of El Dorado to England). Cecil/Salisbury is better recalled to scholars of Elizabethan history, but he was quite a master-success. He was the first Earl of Salisbury, and his family remains a leading set in the British Aristocracy to this day (one of them, Robert Gascoigne Cecil, Marquis of Salisbury, was Queen Victoria's last Prime Minister from 1895 - 1902).A good film about Raleigh would actually concentrate on his various careers as writer, explorer, and would-be colonist. It would show his major achievement as a writer: THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD, and go into his attempts to finance exploration of North America (the "Lost Colony" of Roanoke was created by Raleigh's plans). It would end in the tragedy of 1618, and the ingratitude of a particularly obnoxious monarch. Raleigh did not find El Dorado, and his oldest son died in the attempt to settle a colony in South America. However, his expedition created the British territory of British Guiana (now the nation of Guyana)which is the only English speaking country in South America.That, alas, is not the case with THE VIRGIN QUEEN. Set in the 1580s, Raleigh arrives in the court dominated by the Queen's oldest (and probably truest love), Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester (Herbert Marshall), and by Leicester's rival Hatton (Elizabeth's fairly able Chancellor of Exchequer). Leicester goes to lead a military team who are assisting the Dutch. He died in the Netherlands in 1587 (his death occurs off screen here). Hatton, happy to be rid of his rival finds Leicester's place filled by that upstart Raleigh, and this goes into a long, increasingly bitter rivalry that ends with the death of Dan O'Herlihy. Raleigh decides to leave the court, as he has fallen in love with Bess Throckmorton (which displeases the Queen) and he wishes to explore the New World, but Elizabeth convinces him to remain at court - even allowing him to marry Bess (which he did do).It's not an exciting story at all. They try to pump excitement into it, but Douglas (while good as Hatton) seems to frivolous a character to take seriously. Actually this is quite true in a sense: Elizabeth actually was first attracted to Hatton by his graceful dancing. It just turned out he was a competent public servant as well. The tragedy of O'Herlihy's death is sad but not enough to really make the film tense and interesting (it also comes too late in the film to do much good). While well mounted it is not a good historical movie.Ironically Davis was closer in age to the age of Elizabeth when she made this film, as opposed to ELIZABETH AND ESSEX, where she was playing an older version of Elizabeth when she (Davis) was younger. I think I prefer her performance when she was younger.