Beautiful, moving film.

Am I Missing Something?

Blending excellent reporting and strong storytelling, this is a disturbing film truly stranger than fiction

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

The first one is surely a candidate for best French film of all-time for its pure thick comedy, the history, the emotions, the soundtrack, iconic actors, and one of the most celebrated directors in the country.The second wasn't as bad as they say. This however, even with as much effort as it is fair to concede, still comes across as too weak.The problem first of all is they focused too much on story, not enough on funny. It IS a Visiteurs film after all, not a historical document. They had much to work with as comedians during that rusty old time of post-revolution France, and yet they settled for a group of aristocrats as the main new addition as a source for humor; albeit well written, well acted out by notably Karin Viard who does fantastic as the uptight super hypocritical noblette.No need to spend an hour here: not funny enough, did not exploit the potential of either the classic old elements or the new environment; story is alright but certainly forgettable and only a framework for a mediocre comedy movie.Dubosc adds his own little touch, is funny on a couple of line deliveries, but nothing more.4/10.

This movie should be shown in cinema lessons as among the worst sequels ever, really! Our french BTTF is so bad that you can't imagine it! If you do a sequel, it's because you have a story to tell, especially when you do time travels! Here after 1 hour i was still wondering what this one was about: so our medieval heroes are stuck in Revolution but what's else? nothing... it talks, it shoots, it brawls but it's empty air, it's nothing... Sometimes a sequel can be saved by a talented cast: here there is no none: it's not the cream of the cream but the bottom of the garbage: Dubosc ? Testud ?? Abittan ??? Lutz ???? At last, if it's a comedy, you can laugh... here, not once!When you think about the first movie, the American remake and most of the second movie, you just don't understand what happens here... So it was so bad that i just stopped it after endless dreadful minutes of pain... It's sad for a french classic to not have a worthy final and to be lost forever into the limbs of time....

This third movie is far from the precedent ones. The story was boring and joke-less. I hoped for and I was ready to laugh, but nothing really. It ends with a not-funny racist comment, leaving an even worst "after-taste". Personally, I think one should not allow to play racist movies, at least not in the theatres.

-Les Visiteurs 3: La Révolution is a film franco-belgian tchéco of Jean Marie Poiré delivered in 2016.-It is the third opus of the trilogy Les Visiteurs; it is the sequel to the second opus Les Couloirs du temps : Les Visiteurs 2 ,eighteen years after the production of the latter, in 1998, and twenty years after that of the first film, in 1993. He puts in scene the duo of characters of the first two films, the Duke Godefroy de Montmirail (Jean Reno) and his squire Jacquouille la Fripouille (Christian Clavier), but also new protagonists interpreted by Franck Dubosc, Karin Viard, Sylvie Testud, Ary Abittan, Alex Lutz, Pascal Nzonzi and Marie Anne Chazel.-The film is produced by Sidonie Dumas, general director of Gaumont, the Belgians Sylvain Goldberg and Serge of Poucques for Nexus Factory, Christian Clavier for his production company Ouille productions and by Jean Marie Poiré. In addition to the performance and the production, Poiré is also co-author of the scenario with Christian Clavier, as was the case for the first two films.-Only three actors from the previous two movies play in this third opus, namely Christian Clavier, Jean Reno and Marie Anne Chazel; unlike Reno and Clavier, Marie Anne Chazel embodies not the same character than in the other films.-Filmed from April to June 2015 in the Czech Republic and then in Belgium is the film with the remake Les Visiteurs and Amérique (2001), the second film in the series have not taken place in France. The film is also back to the realization of Jean Marie Poiré, after an interruption of almost 14 years.--Criticism: -The press is not allowed to watch the movie in avant-premiere by fear of bad reviews, the only two projections for press to be reserved for a part of the media TV and radio, less critical reassessment. The Gaumont should be aware of the mediocrity of the film will enter into force on the buzz and the wait before the nostalgi dart elend in the room. In short, the press vibrates the film to its outcome, it reassessment 'laborious", "average" and "dated". According to Mathilde Cesbron, journalist on Point, the film "is nothing more than a vague soup lette and old-fashioned, which even lady Ginette nothing of would like to", with a plot a minima, humor on the discount, a social criticism non-existent, a Jean Reno is non-existent and a Christian Clavier who plays on.