Plot so thin, it passes unnoticed.

n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

OMG!!! I ended up watching this movie because of the scene between Liam Neeson and Olivia Wilde where he grabbed her butt on the street. The whole movie, I was overwhelmed by the raw emotions from the cast members. And when I checked the reviews just out of curiosity, I was so surprised. From professional movie critics, to movie bloggers; everybody was in a race to insult and degrade the movie. I loved, loved and loved it. Music was amazing, adding extra emotion to shattered lives. Again, when someone comes out and creates something that very few could understand, it doesn't go unpunished.

This movie had Paul Haggis' fingerprints all over places but not in the good ways. Paul just extended or limited his creativity around his signature paralleling various story lines then weaving into a monstrosity of who knew what. His Oscar winning film Crash by far is his best of this type of movies as a director. He is a better screen writer than director in my opinion.His talent was the reason to draw those A-list actors and actresses to this movie. However, he lost the focus of the main topic which I am not sure it's about love any more. He applied coincidences way too often to make the whole film congregated naturally. I wish he would not have tried so hard. And the part of revealing Olivia Wilde's character's incest relationship with her father was probably the most appalling and over the top in the entire story. I do not object to use hard subjects in films if only if they would serve the right purpose. This one was out of place except serving as a shocking element. Anyway, I wish to see Haggis' films other than this type in the future. I hope he could extend his writing skill to his directing field.

Main plot begins when Scott (Adrien Brody) finds "love bomb" in small Italian café. Everything else happens around this plot and is called ordinary life with many problems characters have in life. Almost every character is loser except two of them who experienced lose before and they wanted something else. Do good deed, expect good. Do evil deed and expect a lot worse. Someone picks money but what about love? Someone picks love but what happens with money?You can live life without love but what kind of life, and on the other point of view how to live without money? Shakespearean, TO BE OR NOT TO BE. Good movie, well written and directed by Paul Haggis, good acting especially main characters Moran Atias (Monika), Adrien Brody (Scott) and Liam Nelson (Michael). Definitely watch this movie.

A Pulitzer price winner spends 1000 Euro's a day in a Paris Hotel suite to write a novel which is actually a biographic diary of a women who has a ongoing sexual relationship with her father. The movie director received around $30 million to complete the movie with its stellar cast (Kim Bassinger and Liam Neeson amongst others). After a long sit through of 2 hours and 10 minutes I decided to send a two week notice to the funding corporation Corsan, warning that after watching Third Person, the viewer can only judge this movie as a veiled attempt to slush millions of dollars into shady bank accounts of Unknown Persons. The end result can only be seen as a loutish expose of rats on a Euro carnage spending spree, both inside and outside the movie. The entire cast and film crew of course were staying in the same hotel as Liam Neeson, where a routine day of shooting could be witnessed on the top floor with the rolling of the main camera on wheels from the Director's hotel room into Mr. Neeson's hotel suite.