I really wanted to like this movie. I feel terribly cynical trashing it, and that's why I'm giving it a middling 5. Actually, I'm giving it a 5 because there were some superb performances.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

I don't want to spend too much words on this one. I've seen some films in my time (about 200-300 a year). From big box-office scores to the ultra no-budget genre, but never have I seen, nor will I see something as horrible as this. To call this "film" is degrading for the art. No arguments can save this: this is where bad taste ends. I'm not even going to cover storyline etc. If I had paid for this I would have been pretty p***ed-off!

Vampire Time Travellers tries using every cliche in the book to make itself an interesting movie. However, in this task the low budget B picture does not succeed. The main characters are four college coeds seeking to join a sorority after arriving at campus. This naturally brings the potential of plenty of racy action, but sadly the chicks are about as sexy as Mamie Eisenhower! The plot is extremely weak, relying on gimmics such as time travel and vampires to push the story along at a snail's pace. Since the plot is so thin, this movie would have benefitted from star power in the cast. However, I didn't recognize anyone.