Witness for the Prosecution
Witness for the Prosecution
| 04 December 1982 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
Witness for the Prosecution Trailers View All

Sir Wilfred Robarts, a famed barrister is released from the hospital, where he stayed for two months following his heart attack. Returning to the practise of his lawyer skills, he takes the case of Leonard Vole, an unemployed man who is accused of murdering an elderly lady friend of his, Mrs. Emily French. While Leonard Vole claims he's innocent, although all evidence points to him as the killer, his alibi witness, his cold German wife Christine, instead of entering the court as a witness for the defense, she becomes the witness for the prosecution and strongly claims her husband is guilty of the murder.

Reviews
TrueJoshNight

Truly Dreadful Film

FrogGlace

In other words,this film is a surreal ride.

Orla Zuniga

It is interesting even when nothing much happens, which is for most of its 3-hour running time. Read full review

View More
Gary

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

View More
mark.waltz

I recall seeing this on TV back in 1982 long before I got to see the original 1957 film version of Agatha Christie's short story, eager to see after a long absence the ageless Deborah Kerr and the exquisitely beautiful Diana Rigg, whom I had just seen on the big screen in the Agatha Christie murder mystery "Evil Under the Sun". Those who are huge fans of the 1957 Billy Wilder film will be either hugely disappointed or impressed by the subtle changes, where characterizations of the major players are quite different than they were 25 years before. Sir Ralph Richardson isn't as doddering as Charles Laughton's barrister, perhaps more fragile yet equally determined to remain vital in his beloved profession years after most people retire from it. I find that added more of a quality of me rooting for him more, because with Laughton, you know he was already crafty, where with Richardson, it's somewhere beneath the surface and must come out gradually as points of the murder case are revealed to him and everything comes together. Deborah Kerr, second billed in the supporting role of the nurse that Elsa Lanchaster played, is feisty and no-nonsense, but she's not as flighty in her line delivery as the former Bride of Frankenstein was. The film starts with the legendary Wendy Hiller (a co-star of Kerr's from "Love on the Dole" and "Separate Tables") walking down a dark London street, and it is assumed that she will be the victim. But her walk is merely filmed to set up the atmosphere, as she walks into the home of her employer's, sees her laughing with an unseen visitor, and goes upstairs. A sudden crash and only the tiniest hint of a scream gives the indication that something nefarious has occurred, and indeed, when Hiller goes downstairs, she finds her employer dead and the room a ramshackled mess. Beau Bridges comes to see Richardson, certain he will be accused of her murder because of extenuating circumstances (he's been left the dead woman's estate), and over Kerr's objections, Richardson decides to take on his case when the arrest does finally occur. But the presence of Bridges' wife (Diana Rigg) puts a damper on Richardson's defense, especially when she is outed on the witness stand for being a liar and a bigamist. A surprise phone call to Richardson promises to turn the case around, and that of course, leads to some delightful twists and turns where another case becomes imminent for the energetic Richardson, revitalized after such a complex case.I see my original rating, prior to writing this review , was a "10", and as good as this is, it is not perfect. I could have sworn it was multi-nominated for several acting Emmy's or Golden Globes, but found that not to be the case. Perhaps 25 years later after the film, there really were few surprises to discover in this Christie short story, even though the cast (particularly Rigg) is excellent. TV movies in the early 1980's also re-did a lot of the classic tales movie audiences were familiar with, coming around the time of another "Scarlet Pimpernel", "A Christmas Carol", "Oliver Twist" and various other classics of literature and the theater. Still, every detail in this TV version is letter perfect, with the mid 50's atmosphere so luscious, and location footage of the historical landmarks of London making me wish I was there right now. Rarely are remakes better than the original, and rarely are they just as good or even memorable. The aspect of that alone makes this worth seeking out, even if you are, like several friends of mine, major fans of the Laughton/Dietrich/Power version that is considered one of the great mind blowing mysteries of all time.

View More
Khun Kru Mark

Typical 1980s American TV movie lifted only slightly because it's mostly filmed in the UK and has superior British acting talent in the minor roles.Ralph Richardson was obviously very ill when he decided to do this and sleepwalks through the part of Sir Wilfred Robarts. Diana Rigg and Deborah Kerr are just ridiculous characters, Bridges is the token 'Yank', and a host of other excellent British actors are buried under the weight of poor writing and direction.Written (supposedly from Billy Wilder's screenplay) this mess is best used as a way to look at London tourist spots if you can't be bothered to go there! "Ooh, look... there's Harrods. I buy my gloves from there!" Almost every other version of this excellent short story is better than this purile nonsense which has been specifically tailor-made for an American 'Sunday evening' audience.The only value this movie has is seeing some marvelous British actors do their thing but their efforts are entirely wasted on this nonsense.Treat yourself to the Billy Wilder version with Tyrone Power, Charles Laughton, Marlene Dietrich and Elsa Lanchester made 70 years ago. It's a million times better than this cartoon silliness.

View More
electrictroy

I watched Witness for the Prosecution on the "This" movie channel hoping it would be just as good as the original, but unfortunately not.It plays like a TV episode instead of a movie, and the acting is very stilted. Even the way they move feels like watching robots in motion rather than a natural performance. I don't know who to blame - the directors or the actors - but in either case the actors look like actors, not real people experiencing real events.I recommend you get the original movie which DOES feel natural. Charles Laughton does a brilliant job as the lawyer.Even if you have to rent it, the original movie is better than this "free" TV version and worth the expenditure. PBS sometimes runs the original on weekends, so maybe you can catch it then.

View More
The_Rook

Sorry but I find the original a bit slow. The original court case is probably more dramatic. However, I like the cast better in this newer rendition and wish it was available on DVD. Diana Rigg as always is great. Deborah Kerr and Donald Pleasance also turn in good performances.

View More
Similar Movies to Witness for the Prosecution