Is O.J. Innocent? The Missing Evidence
Is O.J. Innocent? The Missing Evidence
TV-14 | 15 January 2017 (USA)

Rent / Buy

Buy from $1.99
Watch Now on Discovery+

Watch with Subscription, Cancel anytime

Watch Now
Seasons & Episodes
  • 1
  • 0
  • Trailers & Images
    Reviews
    Alicia

    I love this movie so much

    PodBill

    Just what I expected

    BroadcastChic

    Excellent, a Must See

    Inadvands

    Boring, over-political, tech fuzed mess

    Brent Brent

    Probably the most disappointing documentary I've ever seen. Ever! This was several hours long ... each episode being 45 minutes that could have better been spent watching paint dry or counting trains go by. Seriously all relevant info. could have been fit into 60 minutes yet they stretched it out an entire season. An example of this ... they want to see if the timeline is correct that Jason Simpson could have driven from work to his girlfriends house to the crime scene at 10:30 pm on a Sunday. So they go out and make the drive on a weekday afternoon in LA when traffic is bad. They get there and one detective says to the other that he thinks traffic would be different at night. So they make the drive again!!! Ever heard of editing? They left both complete drives in.Beyond that sort of stuff which stretches the series out horribly ... including using the same video and audio clips several times throughout the series in different episodes which is a pure sign of hackery ... everything they consider evidence is mostly speculative. Each 'bombshell' piece of evidence is so out there that it would not hold up in any court. At one point they bring out Jason Simpson's journals from a storage locker and some notes one of the detectives find in his trash which have a few sentences about him being sick of 'being Jeckyl and Hyde' and they base the next two episodes around bringing in 22 year old hack psychologists to try to prove that means he's insane enough to murder.The show consists of 3 main characters. There's a crotchety old detective who believes Jason Simpson is guilty and argues everything that way. If there's a picture of Jason (a chef) holding a knife at work, this guy then wants to spend 10 minutes of the episode bringing in forensics experts to refute that it's not the murder weapon. And so on ... Then there's 'the skeptic' who is a former LAPD guy and takes the Devil's Advocate point of view and argues with the guy who believes Jason Simpson did it purely for the TV entertainment value. Finally, there is a Rhode Island cop who looks like every frat boy you ever saw out at a bar doing shots of Jager with the 'bro crew'. He's just kind of there.At one point it got so dumb I had to stop watching because I knew it was all fake garbage reality TV. One of them brings out the If I Did It book which was OJ's 'hypothetical' confession. Now this is a series which literally spends tons of time on the dumbest most minute little scrap of evidence. These are supposedly trained detectives. Yet supposedly, the RI frat boy cop never heard of the book in which OJ lays out his hypothetical version of the murders which includes an accomplice and a blackout. The RI cop's fake surprised acting when they tell him about the book is so bad ... As if anyone going into a project like this wouldn't know about that book. He sits there with a horribly badly acted shocked look and says, 'Are you kidding me?' Schlick alert ...Bottom line, I am an OJ case fanatic. Partly because growing up during that time, it all made no sense to me and I think a part of my generation is really trying to figure out what happened. I've read all the books, watched all the shows and interviews. It's not like I don't know OJ did it ... I'm more fascinated by how society let him get away with it. This documentary did nothing at all ... zero ... towards helping figure that our or at the very least entertain the audience. I would literally probably enjoy watching an episode of Keeping Up With the Kardashians than watch another minute of this poorly produced, terribly edited and boring snooze fest of bad detective work.

    View More
    bew-31931

    After Lange says, Blood, Blood and more Blood, you can change channels unless you want to laugh a lot.Only value was Tom Lange's appearances, and even he was disappointing when he said "there it is" as a fake Bronco was produced with reproduced blood stains.Stop doing these Mr Goldman....please, don't dignify them with the time. Same thing Tanya Brown who likely had to be heavily edited when "Gamechanger" mentioned Jason or begged to stay for a minute after she likely told him to get out off camera. Hope Jason and the home owners at Rockingham and Bundy sue Dear, Sheen and this sham. How many times did they go there or the fake time test at night to film private property? (good thing they were not pulled over for speeding) So after all that the cop on Big Brother "Game-changer" (take a drink every time he said it Levasseur) and the other guy paid $50,000 for a court appearance could not call up the restaurant owner and the partner they interviewed when they were not showing the time clock and ask if the time cards were two-sided A-B? That and Dear threatening grand jury after he produced nothing but some guy who was trying very hard to pass a polygraph who of course learned of this show filming. (and happened to call in) Priceless, was that the baseball card guy on Better Call Saul?They sure had time to keep running out to get Kato more face-time before the show wrapped suddenly to see Georgia Hardstark desperately trying to hide her tattoo on television vs internet version. Hint-Maybe OJ got out of the driver side and opened the passenger door and reached in? The funny thing is the camera quality and overhead shots were right there with O.J Made in America, the slo-mo of the posse walking in the street sums up how fake this was.The handwriting expert meeting them outdoors for a minute, and rubber stamping a hand-writing sample as identical even Vincent Laguardia Gambini would have destroyed, it was beyond funny to see someone walk outside, look at a writing sample and just know it's Jason Simpson.

    View More
    mg75535

    This "docuseries" was clearly a desperate attempt for Bill Dear to get the smear campaign against Jason Simpson of the ground, which he's been attempting to market since 2001. There is no evidence uncovered in this show that wasn't revealed in the Trial or "O.J.: Made in America". Every single piece of evidence that "proves" Jason was involved can be easily explained. The only thing this documentary showed was that O.J. was just as terrible of a father to his children as he was a husband to his wives. It's frankly irresponsible and cruel to be accusing Jason of these atrocious crimes with nothing to back it up except for the word of one attention seeking old hack.

    View More
    industrialwonk

    Unfortunately, I happened to "side-eye" this show indirectly as my wife was watching and waiting in suspense for a mind bending revelation that will never come. This show exists only because critical thinking has vanished in America to such an extent that fallacies can now take the place of fact-finding and truth. A fictional General Jack D. Ripper said that " as human beings, you and I need fresh, pure water to replenish our precious bodily fluids." Pure water is akin to pure information, people cannot process fake and tainted information with impunity from harm. I frankly think that anyone producing an offering forth fallacious programming, such as this, needs to be charged with a Class One Felony and put in jail forever. A better hell for these people would for them to be forced to binge watch their own tripe until they squealed or begged for mercy.

    View More