I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.

One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

There are some shows that people really want to return, but know that she probably shouldn't come back as they'll be pale imitations of the original version.This remake (or continuation) of 'Minder' is a good example of this.It's not bad actually, but it suffers hugely in comparison to the original show.Shane Richie does well, but his character is basically just Alfie Moon (his Eastenders character) under another name.Crucially the writing isn't great, and the plots aren't the best.It's a noble effort, but it just didn't capture the public's imagination in the same way as the original.

This is as bad as it gets. I enjoyed the original Minder and have reviewed that as well.I don't know what was going through peoples minds here?Shane Richie should get it into his head once and for all,that he is a grubby soap opera actor and nothing more. Every other project he does falls flat on its face and he can not act in any great way. A friend of mine who for some reason watches "Eastenders" told me that Richie has now made the character he plays sound like he has got a speech impediment.No one wonder they pulled the plug on this drivel so quickly. Awful in so many ways.

One of the problems of remaking an old series, is that we often forget how awful the original series was at times. Even the classics took a while to get going, and the original Minder was no different. It took many years for George Cole and Dennis Waterman to get into our national blood.The story lines where implausible, but it was sheer escapism into the lovable rogue world of wheeling and dealing. Recall this was the era that Arther Daley and Del Trotter where part of the staple diets of the UK.So a remake of Minder was always going to be a daunting task that wasn't going to win the hearts of many straight out of the gate.Shane Richie plays a very good Archie Daley and is more in the vein of the original George Cole's character than we probably care to remember.This was an enjoyable romp and I look forward to see these characters get comfortable with their surroundings.Don't be quick to judge, as nostalgic series are often best left to our memory.

While the 21st Century version of the classic 80s comedy-drama 'Minder' was always going to have a lot to live up to, the first episodes gives cause for optimism.There was outcry amongst fans when TV personality and sometime TV presenter Shane Ritchie was cast as Archie Daley, nephew of the infamous Arthur, but while Ritchie is not much of an actor, he gets an 'A' for effort here. If anything, he should tone down his 'cheekie-chappie' enthusiasm, in favour of portraying a veneer of reputability, but, as the series will take time to hit its stride so will Ritchie.The plot exists to be disregarded - an entirely nebulous storyline fulfilled its purposes of introducing us to the principals, via a series of non-descript villains. While Petra (who I take to be a relative of the gravel-voiced Dave, proprietor of the Winchester Club in the George Cole original) is a spirited character and looks set to be a series regular, it was Lex Shrapnel who gave the standout performance. Carrying the show with an understated hard edge and an air of seen-it-all-before weariness, he already seems as able a Minder as either Dennis Waterman or Gary Webster.It was during the commercials that I stumbled across Waterman on the other side, and while I thought I would be pining for his gravelly tones and acknowledge considerable presence, I feel that the show, in its infancy, will survive without him.