It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

I was looking forward to this after all the hype and I must say, I was glad I watched it at the beginning, however, with part two I started to get confused. The main story is straightforward, young Ruth being forced to move from her beloved city flat to a cottage in the country right next door to her in-laws after falling pregnant. Postnatal depression causing problems as she struggles to bond with her son as her mother-in-law constantly tries to take over the care of her grandson and convince Ruth that not only is she an unfit mother she is an unfit wife. The first episode was gripping, the sympathy I felt for Ruth drew me in and made me anxious to see how it would play out and also wondering, "Is the mother-in-law really so obsessive and crazy or is it all in Ruth's head?" It left me looking forward to part two and really wanting someone to get her comeuppance, unfortunately it was disappointing. Apart from the fact the second part seemed to throw in a bunch of sub-plots that had no relevance at all and didn't move the story along, I didn't quite get the ending. Did she fall or did Ruth finally snap and push her? While I'm glad the mother-in-law died it was a bit of a cop-out ending and I'm not even sure what happened. While worth a watch and starts off well, the second half really let me down. I'm hoping that the book will be better, as is so often the case

I read the book by Philippa Gregory a few years ago and thought an adaptation of the book would be worth watching. However, the T.V. version did not have the menace of the book. The T.V. series might have worked better as a three parter as the 2 parts seemed to be rather rushed. Why was the male teacher character in it?, what was the role of the sister in Canada? why did the dad change character in the last half hour? Who were the American relatives (and why were they mentioned at all?) And worst of all why change the ending - the ending in the book was far more clever

This two-part TV production was going along quite well, I thought, heading for an anticipated showdown between Francesca Annis's mother-in-law from hell and her would-be victim Lucy Griffith and also one really good twist surely just around the corner waiting to finish it off neatly. Instead, we get a blink-and-you-miss-it denouement with Annis at last getting her just desserts and Griffith turning the tables on her even after the wicked witch is dead, but it was an ending without surprise or tension and for me let down what had been reasonably effectively built up till then.Not that there weren't other faults too, for example, Annis's husband Tim Pigot-Smith's character is too ambiguous. In episode 1 you're convinced he's in cahoots with his wife's nefarious and frankly unfathomable wish to appropriate Griffith's child for herself but in the second show, he's revealed to be innocent and in fact exposes, even if unwittingly, some of Annis's devious plans. There's also a male friend of Griffith who you think is going to play a bigger part than he does and there's also an obscure red-herring too in the references to Annis's other daughter, who now lives aboard and obviously has a testy relationship with her mother, presumably because she wasn't a boy.There were no genuinely scary moments, the only fairly mundane attempt being Annis's silly dressing up as Griffith's late mother, in full 60's hippy gear, to supposedly convince her victim she's lost her mind, but it maintained a decent head of steam up until that anti-climactic finish which let it down.The acting by the four leads is all good and a chilly if not chilling atmosphere is pretty well conveyed from the start. Again I felt a bit more menace could have been conveyed in the sets for the houses themselves especially given the series title, after all.

The beautiful Miss Lucy Griffiths is the only reason for watching this weary exposition of one of T.V.'s favourite themes - two strong women in conflict over two weak men. Miss Francesca Annnis - looking scarily like Cherie Blair - is made up like a pantomime dame and about as convincing as the loopy mother - in - law.Used to dominating her husband and son,she initially finds her daughter - in - law equally submissive,but,as they clash over her obsession with controlling her son and grandson,she finds the tables turned. For no good reason that I could make out there were unresolved sub - plots about a fatal car crash,an absent sister,a work colleague with a crush on Miss Griffiths and a mysterious figure skulking in the woods. Halfway through the first episode we are told Miss Griffiths is in fact American by birth - a complete irrelevance. At the end it appears that Miss Griffiths has in fact turned into her mother - in - law. The scene where Miss Annis sniffs the sheets on which her son had just made love to his wife made me laugh more than watching Michael McIntyre's entire output. And another thing...having been trailered by ITV so assiduously for so long before its transmission,I felt that I had seen most of the relevant parts of "The Little House" many times before. Perhaps if it had been sprung upon me cold - as it were - it wouldn't have been such a disappointment.