9 Songs
9 Songs
NR | 16 July 2004 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
9 Songs Trailers

Matt, a young glaciologist, soars across the vast, silent, icebound immensities of the South Pole as he recalls his love affair with Lisa. They meet at a mobbed rock concert in a vast music hall - London's Brixton Academy. They are in bed at night's end. Together, over a period of several months, they pursue a mutual sexual passion whose inevitable stages unfold in counterpoint to nine live-concert songs.

Reviews
Stometer

Save your money for something good and enjoyable

Janae Milner

Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

View More
Mandeep Tyson

The acting in this movie is really good.

Fatma Suarez

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

View More
foxhound-37781

This movie is just downright pathetic. Why? well lets see....1. Boring as all hell 2. Sex scenes for the sake of sex scenes 3. The two actors have no real deep connection on sreen 4. Concert footage looks like it was shot by a 4 year old 5. Film is so quiet it will literally put you to sleep if your watching it after 9pm 6. Boring as all hell 7. Sex sells so naturally this is why everyone was interested in it to begin with. (THE ONLY REASON) 8. Boring as all hell 9. The two actors deliberately kept away from each other off camera so it supposedly wouldn't "Affect their on screen relationship" like seriously what do you hope to achieve by that? 10. A romantic drama that's literally just a softcore porno in disguise. false marketing!

View More
FountainPen

Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". Avoid this "film" ~ it is a cheap, badly made excuse for "soft-porn". The music is awful, too ! Sleep, read a book, learn a language, but don't waste your time with this.

View More
tomgillespie2002

Michael Winterbottom is one of the most important and challenging filmmakers around. Over the past couple of decades, he has directed a prolific stream of interesting features across a variety of genres, refusing to settle on a particular style and seemingly always working on a minuscule budget. But no filmmaker is immune to producing a stinker, and after a successful 2002 which saw the release of the excellent double-header of 24 Hour Party People and In This World, Winterbottom hit a grey patch with Code 46 and 9 Songs. He would push the boundaries of what could be tolerated in terms of cinematic violence in 2010 with the divisive The Killer Inside Me, but 6 years earlier he would test the BBFC's waters with 9 Songs, a film that may still be the most sexually explicit film ever to be released in British theatres.It tells the story of two lovers: Matt (Kieran O'Brien), a British scientist, and Lisa (Margo Stilley), an American exchange student. As the film opens, the couple have broken up and Matt is heading to Antarctica to conduct research and reflect on their doomed relationship. He remembers their time together through the sex they had, and they had a lot of it. 9 Songs quickly falls into a pattern: Sex scene, concert scene, and then a trip back to desolate mountains of Antarctica. They met at Brixton Academy and share a love of live music, so between the sex we get to experience the various gigs they go to - the 9 songs of the title - shot guerrilla-style from afar over the heads of the audience, which is pretty much how most of us experience a concert. The sex is passionate, spontaneous and exciting, but love is much harder. As it becomes clear to both of them that they won't be together forever, they employ blindfolds and handcuffs to spice things up, but nothing can mask the distance opening between them.Winterbottom doesn't shy away from explicitness. We get to see full penetration, oral sex and even a money shot - pretty much everything you would expect from a cheeky browse on Pornhub. But what separates 9 Songs from pornography is the complete lack of sensationalism. There is absolutely nothing arousing about the sex, despite the attractiveness of the two leads, and this is likely what convinced the BBFC to pass it uncut (it's 'art'). The problem with 9 Songs is that the idea is infinitely more interesting than the execution. This is an incredibly dull and repetitive film, made all the more of a chore to sit through by the two thinly-realised and rather annoying characters at the forefront. Winterbottom seems to be trying to say something profound by occasionally switching the action to the South Pole, but it comes across as allegory on the level of a student-film. The concert footage is filmed with the same grungy energy as 24 Hour Party People - one of my favourite Winterbottom films - so there's some relief to be found in performances by the likes of Primal Scream, Franz Ferdinand and Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, if you're into that sort of thing.

View More
videorama-759-859391

I do love this movie. When seeing it again in 2008, after a three year absence, I loved it more, so much, I watched it again, as having bought the DVD, while I was in Sydney. It was taken off the shelves in Adelaide, within about two weeks. Yes the film is very daring, and explicit, and sexy Stilley, a former model, is hot as an American student. Her acting's not. It's more done, if for naturalism. You would of seen her in that M and M's add in a green sweater, where here, she's naked for most of it. The English boyfriend, who's interesting occupation, takes him to the Antarctic, he loves so much, was a job angle I loved. Original. Stilley has struck up a hot relationship with him, where Kieren O'Brien is incredibly dull to watch, though likable, delivering an utterly terrible performance almost of void, but again too, it's done for naturalism, which is the feel I've got from the film. I don't know if these actors hailed from the same acting school as the leads from Open Water. This adult feature, that does border on porn, one scene, that pushed the envelope, which I imagine, was removed from the shelves, after a complaint, is really a love story strung together by an abundance of sex scenes, one after the other that involves a lot of lovemaking, where a beautiful thing is going on there, punctuated by rock concert scenes, featuring songs and music I loved. There's one small argument, that Stilley, with her character of vitality and looseness sparks up, which I wish had eventuated into more. At times her character is obnoxious. She does have her moods. Thank god we have her, to bring life into the relationship, in contrast to the distrait O'Brien. It does pain and sadden us, when the two part, at the end, after all the sex and love they've been through, where it is affecting, a too fitting titled, if punishing song attached to it. In fairness the 69 minute movie has the look of a half finished project, or it is, as if the other half of the movie went missing, where they're are only a couple of things that hold it together, but their things the audience love, that compensates for the notion, that may'be it's not really meant to be taken for a movie, but a very explicit and sexy experience, where those easily offended by raw sex, nudity, should steer clear. Dialogue too is scarce, of minimum number, one line has Stilley looking in the mirror, asking O'Brien, "Do I look like a boy". Check out her bare body, while she says that, you'll pick up on something that will have you answering "Yes", but I don't want to get too personal. Definitely for art house lovers, or people, who want to get their rocks off.

View More