Avanti!
Avanti!
R | 17 December 1972 (USA)
Watch Now on Prime Video

Watch with Subscription, Cancel anytime

Watch Now
Avanti! Trailers View All

A successful businessman goes to Italy to arrange for the return of his tycoon-father's body only to discover dad died with his mistress of long standing.

Reviews
Rijndri

Load of rubbish!!

Bereamic

Awesome Movie

Livestonth

I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible

View More
Hadrina

The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

View More
blaberma

Not Billy Wilders best but at times funny and an absolutely beautiful movie to look at.Hard to choose which is more beautiful,the Italian Riviera or Juliet Mills in the altogether.This was the Nanny and the Professor that everyone of us who was in love with Juliet Mills wanted to see.The hardest part of the movie to believe is that it takes Jack Lemmon so long to fall in love with her.If you see this movie is on one of your cable channels it is a definite must see for the laughs,the scenery and the loveliness of Italy and Juliet Mills Alpine curves and exquisite English beauty.Edward Andrews and Clive Revill both have a field day with their character roles and were never better.

View More
mainefred

My favorite comedy. I must have seen it 10 times, laughing just as much each time. Billy Wilder at his best, aided by a wonderful cast of character actors, headed by the marvelous Clive Revill. Then there is the coroner, with his ever-ready official stamp, Bruno the valet, the restaurant head waiter, and the hilarious Trotta brothers - all set against beautiful Mediterranean scenery and gorgeous Neapolitan music. Who could ask for anything more? Juliet Mills is perfect in the female lead, and Jack Lemmon, while too edgy for my taste, is more than adequate. The movie gives you one great scene after another. If you've never seen it, I envy you. You will probably want to watch it again and again.

View More
maync

You can do that by simply not watching this atrocity. I said so over 10 years ago and I maintain the same line. You've got to be over 70 AND hate modern times to like this ancient concoction. I've seen Lemmon in memorable movies, but he ain't in this one. But then, any old movie has trouble keeping up with changing culture, I'll give you this. I admit, I saw Avanti, possibly when I was too young to make much sense of it. But it did cause me a few laughs. That I remember. Watching it now, I see myself sitting stony-faced, counting the minutes. What on earth was that all about!? I need to write ten lines but there's nothing to be said other than save yourself the expense, the time, the disappointment. If you have to see ancient movies, get yourself something substantial and let me know what that might be. Thank you. Go away, Avanti.

View More
fedor8

1972. Back in the day when romantic comedies were made in such a way that both sexes could watch them, not just women. Nowadays, when you read "romantic comedy" in relation to the latest formulaic piece of celluloid crap that Hollywood is desperately trying to hype, you can expect garbage; some lame-brained, unfunny mess with Justin Timberlake and Cameron Diaz mugging like eager-to-please amateurs - should the casting be at its very worst. (Or the amazing non-talents of an Ashton Kutcher and an annoying personality of a La Lopez. The list goes on and on.)A! works because Jack Lemmon isn't a former Mickey-Mouse-Club amateur with a squeaky girly voice, and Juliet Mills isn't a perpetually giggling non-beauty with the body shape of an overgrown pencil. Mills is shapely, curvaceous, charismatic, sexy and pretty, and Lemmon is funny and interesting. There is actual chemistry between them, the story is fun, the gags work, and there is no crude, lewd, low-brow, cheap-ass, teenage approach to sex that we get to see in comedies of recent years, in which having sex is always referred to as "f**king" or "screwing", the F word being a poor substitute for a total lack of inspiration and humour.The only drawback to A! is its length. At well over two hours it does violate somewhat the unwritten rule about comedies and horror films not exceeding 90 minutes. Trust Billy Wilder, that senile old Commie, to have actually made a mention of the Sacco & Vanzetti case. No doubt Billy considered those murdering anarchists as totally innocent. (God forbid a Marxist ever gets punished for anything, even genocide.) Later on, he has an Italian local give the right-arm Nazi salute to the Republican Ambassador. Billy, Billy, Billy, what are we to do with you? Must you include your unsubtle political propaganda even in a harmless little romantic comedy?But if you thought Billy's delusion ended with his extremist politics, think again. He thought that he had injected too much humour into what was meant to be a drama! He stated that they had intended to make a movie more like "The Apartment" (i.e. they wanted it to stink so it could win Oscars). Good thing they "failed", because not only does that vastly overrated movie stink, but I can't imagine how the hell A! could have possibly worked as a drama.The two Wilder movies do have something in common though (apart from Lemmon): both tend to ridiculously idealize women who latch on to (older) married men. Mills's mother was even said to have hidden her poor financial situation from Lemmon's father (the millionaire) because she "loved him", hence that she never received any gifts or financial aid from him. That is so over-the-top stupid that it's almost funny on its own.

View More