The greatest movie ever made..!

Good start, but then it gets ruined

An action-packed slog

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

Released the year following "Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song" and "Shaft" (both 1971), the two films most often credited with launching the blaxploitation genre, "Blacula" started a horror cycle within blaxploitation films, which includes its sequel, "Scream, Blacula, Scream" (1973), as well as reworkings of other Gothic horror novels, with obvious renaming such as "Blackenstein" (1973) and "Dr. Black and Mr. White" (1976). "Blacula," on its own terms, is an interesting balancing act between campiness and social commentary. I've been watching a bunch of Dracula-related movies since reading Bram Stoker's novel, and most adaptations that work on even a basic level are one or the other, between allegory and camp, but not both. That's because they're seemingly contradictory approaches; one requires us to take its truth seriously, and the other asks us to laugh at its absurdity. I'm not saying both approaches can't work well together, but in "Blacula" the combination is off balance. It's humorously bad one moment; it's well-crafted and insightful the next.The interracial gay couple spells out the campiness of Dracula in the film's first present-day scene, as they explain it as their reason for buying the late Count's possessions, including Blacula locked up in his coffin. The homosexuals themselves are outlandish stereotypes of effeminate men, shrieking in terror as Blacula slaps them around, just as he does to female victims. And, Blacula amusingly grows considerably more hair on his head after being turned into a vampire, including his eyebrows now being connected to the hair on top of his head. And, of course, he must wear a cape now that he's a vamp. None of which, however, squares with William Marshall's dignified and sympathetic portrayal of the titular role. That is, when he's not growling while biting his victims or being transported by a dolly with parts visible in frame.As the film's Transylvanian prelude set in 1780 establishes, Blacula was once the African Prince Mamuwalde, who traveled to Castle Dracula to request the Count's help in suppressing the slave trade. Instead, Dracula enslaves Mamuwalde as a vampire and traps him within the coffin--separating him from his lover for nearly 200 years. "Blacula" seems to be the first Dracula-esque picture to include a reincarnation romance, as Mamuwalde's wife is reborn in a duplicate body--down to the short hair. Personally, I dislike the reincarnation romance storyline, and I think it ruined other Dracula movies, including the 1974 TV movie and the 1992 theatrically-released one, both mistitled "Bram Stoker's Dracula." The one here, however, is not as stupid, and it doesn't include the exaggerated link between Stoker's Dracula and the historical Vlad the Impaler that the later movies do.Anyways, beginning the film during the time of the American Revolution and connecting vampirism to slavery sets up the later involvement of the police in hunting Black vampires in America's urban landscapes. (After some footage of a coffin being transported, which was cannibalized from another Dracula-esque film, "Count Yorga, Vampire" (1970).) The first time an officer sees Blacula, he chases him--presumably because he finds a black man running to be suspicious. Unarmed in any non-supernatural sense, Dracula approaches him with his arms up. The cop fires his gun at him. This scene has as much resonance today, if not more, with the rise of media depictions of police killings of black men, the Black Lives Matter movement, and the protest slogan, "Hands up, don't shoot!" Of course, the audience knows that Blacula's pose is in preparation for him to suck the blood from the officer, but how would the policeman know that. "Blacula" follows the usual complex discovery plot, the common formula of horror movies as outlined by Noël Carroll, so most characters are unaware or skeptical of vampirism at this point in the film. Given that, I would think it more likely to believe Blacula was a mentally-impaired man, growling and dressed as he is, surrendering himself after realizing he was being pursued by the police rather than a physical threat, let alone a supernatural monster. But, in the moment, the cop panics and shoots.Similar scenes play out later in the movie--always involving White policemen and Black vampires. The film's two White vampires, however, are killed by the film's Black Van Helsing type. One of these is a turned policeman, whom the police chief can't bring himself to harm, although he has no trouble helping the Doctor kill the Black vampires. That the police are involved at all in a Dracula movie is unusual and obviously is because, this time, the vampire narrative is set in an urban area populated by African Americans. Recalling the 1931 "Dracula," Blacula quips that the vampire's greatest strength is peoples' disbelief in him. And, in this case, it seems the vampire's greatest weakness is peoples' racism.Perhaps, the closest "Blacula" comes to balancing its camp and social commentary is when Blacula beats the white policemen to death; it's potentially both cathartic and outrageous. The same may be said of the Doctor's killings of White vampires, although his character manages to successfully align himself with the White ruling class, as represented here by the police force, whereas Blacula, 200 years ago, was betrayed in his attempts to cooperate with the White Dracula. Perhaps, then, there's a message of hopeful progress in "Blacula," too... or not.

from the title and trailer, i was expecting comedy, and the film does start out fairly campy but quickly assumes a more serious tonedirector William Crain is, according to Wikipedia, 'one of the first black filmmakers from a major film school to achieve commercial success'. the screenplay by Joan Torres and Raymond Koenig, who evidently only ever wrote this film and its sequel, Scream Blacula Scream, is basically a retelling of Dracula set in Los Angeles in the early '70s. the film has the makings of a Gothic romance but with a funk soul atmosphere, driven by a lively rhythm and blues soundtrack composed by Gene Page the acting is hit-and-miss, with excellent performances from Thalmus Rasulala as Dr. Gordon Thomas, the film's version of Van Helsing, and William Marshall in the title role. the police brutality (i.e, the brutality with which Mamuwalde, a.k.a. Blacula, handles the police when they get in his way) is great fun, and i love the animation sequence during the opening credits if you haven't seen this, you should fix that. i'll definitely have to check out the sequel, which features Pam Grier in a leading role

Even Elisha Cook Jr. couldn't save this from being a bad joke. So why the 10? Diversity!! The same reason it should have won at least 15 Oscars. If film is an art form it should be treated as such, judged as such, and honored as such. Justice and equal opportunity should be part and parcel of America and so should the movie industry. The battle starts at the front door and should be taken all the way to the Academy Awards. So as Blacula would say, "Right on, brother". Now back to the actual movie. The nightclub scenes were by far the highlight. A black audience dancing to a white band is a touch of irony that is sheer pleasure to watch. The acting was inspired, although by what is hard to tell. The LA cops pretty much stole the show with their emotionless performances and it was hard to take you eyes off them when they were on screen. However the most outstanding aspect of all was the make-up. Downright scary, it gave me nightmares for a week. Well. at least bad dreams. A must see (to believe).

Basically, this is the story of Dracula updated to the modern day, with blaxploitation trappings to make it distinctive of the era. And a pretty good little variant it is too. Apart from gasping in wonder at the fashions and the afros on display, there's actually a pretty rigid plot here amid the various shows of vampirism. As a spoof, it works extremely well, with Blacula going through all the motions.There's some fine acting from Marshall and Rasulala as the two opposing parties, and loads of great dialogue throughout, such as one character's catchphrase "That is one strange dude". The special effects are handled nicely, with Blacula turning into an animated bat, and the dissolution of his body at the end reminds one of the Hammer DRACULAdeaths (except with extra maggots). While this is nothing spectacular, it's still an essential slice of cult '70s mayhem.