the audience applauded

That was an excellent one.

Such a frustrating disappointment

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

The 1980s saw some okay music, the advent of computers into the home was really taking off, and the science fiction genre (riding off the coat tails of Star Wars) was really making a comeback in feature films.But not everything from the 80s is golden, as I mentioned in some previous reviews. And Caddyshack is one of them.Simply put I don't get this film. I really don't. Bill Murry has a kind of Ahab-like obsession with a rodent chewing up his workplace home turf, and there's some thing about a gold contest and an examination of snobbery. Bill Murry acting like a drugged out gardener is not funny. It simply is not funny. I don't know why people (mostly men) heap praises on it, but it is not funny in the least. Or, rather it could be but you would have had to have shaved off several IQ points from your personal intelligence quotient.And I can't make it any plainer than that.This is one of those few rare occasions where the sequel is funnier, and given that this film is worthy of a smirk or two at best, that's not high praise.If you like idiotic humor, then maybe check out this film, but don't say I didn't warn you.Watch at your peril.

Harold Ramis' 1980 golf comedy about the crazed hilarity of the caddies and members at an upscale country club got rather poor reviews upon release, and was not extremely successful at the box office. Many people were disappointed because it wasn't Animal House (which Ramis co-wrote), as both films had the same vein of humor and several people involved behind the camera. Within a few years though it gained a huge cult following and audiences and even some critics then went on to proclaim it as one of the funniest movies of all time. When I first saw it, I indeed found it to be very, very funny. That was also when I was a pre-teen mind you. Rodney Dangerfield's opening lines and battles with Ted Knight made me laugh out loud, as well as Bill Murray's famous battle with the gopher, and his scene with Chevy Chase smoking pot in his "house." While this is a funny movie, it was rather amazing to discover that many consider this a true comedy classic. Having not seen in it quite some time recently, I wanted to see if it was still the comedy classic I remembered it to be and if I agreed with the majority or if I thought it was more on the over- hyped side. Sad to say but the movie hasn't help up great 37 years later and I am leaning towards the latter side. Now I will admit Dangerfield's opening scenes, some of his other dialogue and screen time with Ted Knight is still very, very funny but looking back on it, that's only in the first half of the movie and towards the end it's a shtick that just gets tiresome and less funny. Knight on his own really doesn't bring the movie any extra momentum. His role seems more recycled from his days as Ted Baxter on the Mary Tyler Moore Show. It seems like the movie thinks it's still funny for others to put down and insult his character in the same way Ted Baxter was put down for being such an egotistical annoying pest, but it was only funny the first time, and Knight doesn't do anything different or special with his role here. Murray, who many people quote his dialogue from this movie to this present day is also really not given any opportunity to do anything special. He has a couple of funny moments with the gopher, but those really bring more of a chuckle than a genuine laugh, and his "Cinderella Story" scene which is put on lists of the all time greatest movie quotes is worthy of a slight chuckle but that's about it. There is nothing special about it to be on the list of the all-time greats. Murray's only laugh out loud moment was when he disinfected the pool and ate the Baby Ruth bar. And then the movie has subplots about caddy scholarships, yacht clubs, out of wedlock pregnancy and none of it seems to really quite blend well enough to do the plot any justice. Chevy Chase has one or two genuinely funny lines, but outside of that his character is really more of an underdeveloped and awkward distraction more than anything else. Michael O'Keefe who was wonderful with Robert Duvall in The Great Santini is wasted and also,sadly, an underdeveloped character. I guess he is supposed to provide support to the main comic stars, but his character is just another missed opportunity which could have made the movie funnier. I wonder if some think this is such a classic because of Dangerfield's funny bits. Were it not for him this movie would have totally sucked and been long forgotten. Because of him I am feeling nice enough to give it a modest 6. He was far better six years later in Back to School which Ramis co-wrote, that script had a far better use of his talent. Murray and Ramis fared better the following year in Stripes which holds up far better than this one does and eventually Groundhog Day over a decade later, and Chase and Ramis fared far better in National Lampoon's Vacation three years later. That's why I can't understand considering that Ramis made much funnier movies with the main stars of this one, why this one is considered the all-time classic, while the others don't come close to having the same status. This was Ramis' directorial debut and Dangerfield's first major movie so it was a good warm-up for them but they made much better movies later on. All in all Caddyshack is vaguely funny, but there is essentially no story, too many distracting, meaningless subplots, some of which are totally irrelevant to the so-called "plot" and only one truly funny main character (Dangerfield's). So while it definitely didn't deserve the poor reviews it got upon original release, it also shouldn't be considered the classic it is nowadays. 37 years later it's mildly amusing with a few funny moments worthy of a couple smiles and one or two genuinely laugh out loud moments. Even Happy Gilmore which some critics described as a Caddyshack wannabe is funnier and I think is more worthy of classic comedy status. So if you want to see if Caddyshack is the classic they say it is or if you want to see if it's held up to that standard 37 years later you will be disappointed. If you're just expecting a few chuckles to kill some time you won't be.

"Caddyshack" was Harold Ramis' first job in the director's chair, and it shows: the tension is slack, there is far too much improvisation, and there's a lack of focus both in narrative and theme. Caddyshack features fine performances from Bill Murray, Rodney Dangerfield, Chevy Chase, Ted Knight, and of course, the gopher. This motion picture is replete with sight gags and one-liners that to this day are repeated by aficionados of clever satire. As far as the improv goes, one gets the sense that Chase, Dangerfield, and even Murray just sort of steamrolled Ramis. I'm sure it was a fun set to be on perhaps too much fun.I can see that the jokes are mostly lame, the subplots are predictable and the acting rarely rises above the adequate. But I still can't help laughing like a drain whenever I watch it. You don't have to be a lowbrow to like this movie, and just because you think it's funny doesn't mean there's something wrong with you. Caddyshack and Animal House withstand the test of time as two of the funniest comedies ever made... and that stands for a lot! Overall rating: 6 out of 10.

Well, well, well, finally the time has come and I've watched this so acclaimed comedy. First of all I consider myself a Bill Murray fan, I've enjoyed somewhat Chavy Chase and Roger Dangerfield's work, so the fact I had never watched Caddyshack until now was becoming a sense of guilt. Damn, I had read reviews saying this is one of the best comedies of the eighties. So, after watching Caddyshack I only could shake my head and tried to understand how this can be one of the funniest movies ever. I can't make heads or tails of this film, I mean, it feels like it was made of different sketches with no solid or unified script,and full of wasted actors (Bill Murray is like useless) or plain bad acting (Chavy Chase), gratuitous nudity (ok, eighties comedy I know) and a terrible pacing. Nonetheless I can't say this is the worst movie I've ever seen, it's enjoyable till certain point, but in no way this is one of the best comedies around.