Sorry, this movie sucks

Fantastic!

The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

Several couples are given free passage on a cruise ship. Little do they know that the company in the letter with the tickets doesn't exist and it's just a murderer's pretext to get them in one place so he or she could kill them! As for the couples, they all are screwed up. One has a husband who is a philanderer (Richard Long and Polly Bergen), another a husband and wife who don't know what to do with their marriage now that the kids are grown (Tom Bosley and Celeste Holm) and the other is arguing about whether or not they'll have children (Edward Albert and Kate Jackson). You also see quite a bit of Dr. Burke (Michael Constantine) and the Captain (Cesare Danova). But what's the connection between all these people?! As for the doctor, he fancies himself to be an amateur detective and investigates! The plot, when you think about it, is really very much like "The Love Boat" combined with "Diagnosis Murder"! The set-up for the story was good and the film could have worked. So why did I give it only a 3? Well, the writing was spotty and there were way too many ridiculous moments. First, the killer was easy to figure out because it was obvious they were in a costume. Second, when the crew figured out someone was trying to kill the couples, why didn't they put all the surviving people in a room together with guards? Instead, they gave them ample opportunities to separate themselves and get killed. Why would they continue to allow people to skeet shoot aboard the ship (common back in the day) once they knew a killer was among them? Why would the doctor confront the murderer all alone--without backup and with a gun? And, how could someone at a great distance so easily shoot one man and avoid hitting another only a few feet away? This is NOT an easy shot! There were more inconsistencies and mistakes...but these things SHOULD have been worked out before shooting the script. I can only assume it was hurried into production.The film's interior shots were done aboard the Queen Mary--an old cruise ship permanently anchored in Long Beach, California (near Hollywood). I was shocked by the rooms, as they were HUGE!

I happened to catch this on community TV a few years back and was pleasantly surprised how enjoyable a film it was.While a bit corny in certain ways, as its prime function of being a mystery thriller it works superbly, thanks to a script that concocts an ingenious plot; it kept me guessing throughout and the resolution is inspired.The cast is a star-studded one, containing a mixture of those at the end of their careers (indeed Richard Long died the same year this was made), or those who were on the verge of stardom in hit TV series (Kate Jackson, Tom Bosley). They all do a good job, with the exception of Cesare Danova who sleepwalks through his role.Strongly recommended.

Seems to me there have been more than enough movies (or episodes on TV shows) wherein a mystery killer picks off a group of people one by one, and then crosses their faces with a big 'X' on a group-photo where everyone is smiling and happy. The theatrical film "The Last of Sheila" used a group-photo as a red herring, but "Death Cruise" doesn't have time for subtlety. It's a telefilm, short on time and short on budget. A would-be "Ten Little Indians", the cast is littered with has-beens (Richard Long), should-have-beens (Edward Albert), and one fresh face (Kate Jackson, giving off some enchanting, mysterious charisma). It's a cross between "The Love Boat" and "Murder, She Wrote", yet it does predate both and was fairly intriguing for its time. Seen today, it's a tacky hoot, although there is a neat twist at the finish line. As TV-movies go: ** from ****

I saw this when I was twelve. It was the movie that made me understand what a good mystery really was. I had read the entire Happy Hollisters children's mystery series and they were about a family of child sleuths who always got their man. But we the readers were not in a position to solve the mystery along with them. This movie showed me that a good mystery is that which makes the viewer/reader, at the end, say, "OH!!!!! OF COURSE!!!!!!!"