Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.

What a waste of my time!!!

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

The movie really just wants to entertain people.

The movie is actually fairly dull, not that funny, with kooky characters that are just kooky and not that interesting. That said, it makes an important statement about Hollywood and Hollywood screen writing.The consensus is that this film accurately explains the hellish environment a Hollywood screenwriter goes through in trying to chase their dreams. I've read a couple of biographies of famous writers and the issues they mention are shown in this film. While most people presume that everything we see in a movie is based on the many concrete choices made by its screenwriter or director, the reality is different. For a screenwriter either you never get the film made the way you want it, or you chase the paycheck and compromise with the money men.In this movie the money men are only willing to put up money for a film as long as their girlfriend is handed a juicy part. This of course means the main character, a screenwriter played by Bob Wuhl, has to decide to compromise or not to compromise. A complication exists in that his wife is in New York, trying to get their dreams of a restaurant up and running. Unfortunately this isn't a real fallback option, since she isn't his muse; the Hollywood dream is. Thus the concept "mistress" is multifaceted. Is it a reference to the girlfriends of the producers? Is it his wife? Is it Hollywood? Is it his dream of being a famous respected artist? The movie could have gone deeper and been a powerful satire, a wonderfully entertaining critique and an important cautionary tale. Regrettably its not as deep as all that and only succeeds at the latter. Perhaps this is in itself a statement. A very formulaic film done on purpose to explain why most Hollywood films are indeed formulaic? It feels like a precursor to Adaptation. Or am I trying to see things that aren't there?In any case while the whole experience is a little watered down, if you know someone that wants to be a screenwriter you should show them this film as it does lift the lid on the Hollywood dream and reveals how it really is, at least most of the time. For a better quality satire on the same topic watch The Player (1992).

Barry Primus directed and co-wrote this 'Hollywood insider's comedy' which isn't very inside and is never terribly funny. Robert Wuhl is a struggling screenwriter who, with help from Martin Landau's over-the-hill movie producer, hopes to get his picture made with financial backing from three hot-tempered high rollers; the catch is, each investor wants his mistress to have a part in the film, and all three women prove very difficult to handle. Potentially interesting premise given over to foul-mouthed neurotics who are never as amusing as they're supposed to be. Wuhl, an actor of quicksilver comedic timing, thanklessly plays the incredulous observer here, while the all-star supporting cast loudly plays up the material until the satirical edge flags and becomes cartoonish. Primus' direction is wobbly and uneven, though he gets some amusing facial expressions from Robert De Niro (who also co-produced, for reasons which are unclear). Shabbily edited, and with ungainly cinematography. *1/2 from ****

The info button described MISTRESS as thus " An earnest screenwriter sees his dream mangled in the Hollywood movie machine . Robert DeNiro is a crass moneyman demanding a role for his talentless mistress " Great I thought , this is going to be like THE KING OF COMEDY except it`s set in Hollyloot . Twenty minutes later DeNiro`s still not appeared and I`m aware of one thing - info buttons are never right The info button wasn`t so much wrong but it was rather misleading . DeNiro does indeed play a crass moneyman who is after a role for his mistress but she`s not exactly talentless . The plot mainly revolves around a failed director/screenwriter called Marvin who finds himself having to severly alter his script if he wants it produced , it`s a sort of satire/black comedy on the Hollyloot system of film making and once you get over the initial disappointment of it not being a Scorsese / DeNiro masterpiece it`s an enjoyable film , and one with a lot of scathing truth like a pitch is all down to presentation , casting is down to who the actress is sleeping with and a producer`s vulgarity is only matched by his ignorance . Also watch out for the line " This isn`t BATMAN 3 " which at that time hadn`t been produced yet . I guess someone made BATMAN 3 as a homage to MISTRESS ?

MISTRESS (1992) *** Robert Wuhl, Robert De Niro, Martin Landau, Sheryl Lee Ralph, Danny Aiello, Eli Wallach, Jean Smart, Ernest Brognine (cameo). Bitingly funny satire about a struggling filmmaker wanting to make his dream script facing obstacles by each financial backer wanting their mistress in the film. Christopher Walken and Laurie Metcalf have small roles.