A Disappointing Continuation

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.

If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

One day my friends and I decided to watch this film after seeing at a store for one dollar and fifty cents, I really wish I had held to the money. First off the first death scene was so bad I thought the killer was trying to show how not to kill someone. Also the gore was all over the place, but the gore was black and looked like someone pooped all in the blood supply and then vomited into it. It really is that bad. Dialoge is superb if you consider the phrases of newborns intelligent. I plan on donating this to the feed the Ethiopians fund, but they probably wouldn't even eat it. I guess I'll just set it on fire. But no seriously don't watch this film it really is as bad as every one says and it so bad it really isn't all that funny. Also the nudity is gross can you spell ugly goth chicks I know I can and my mind will be scared forever. The only words to describe how this movie is, is blood orgy. Watch this and you will die I promise.

I bought this Movie at a cheap discount warehouse in Australia for two dollars, the cover looked very cool and the idea of a killer clown seemed (though not original) something that might be entertaining.What a mistake, the acting is awful the victims still seem to be moving and breathing, the make up is pitiful, the lighting is bad, the sound is bad (gunshots sound like a toy cap gun) Don't mistake my comment for one of those ïts so bad it must be cool comments, its so bad its just plain terrible.I cannot begin to describe how bad this movie is, the camera work is so bad using the old trick of editing and cutting to create gore, the sound is very bad, the acting is bad, the story,effects,directing,plot is all bad.Basically this movie sucks, i give it 1 because you cannot give a lower score

I turned the move off after the lady dumped the handful of bloody potatoes in the opening scene. I should have guessed it was going to be this terrible when the opening credits read like those of a porno movie: "Tommy Brunswick". And then they just skipped the last names all together and only used first names... and then they skipped the first names and only used nick names. How on EARTH do people produce this crap and actually think they did a good job. This crap would do more bad for a producers reputation than it would good.However, with all of this being said... this movie was still not anywhere nearly as bad as "Dungeon Girl." You must check it out, even if it's only to make Mr. Jingles look like an Oscar-winner in comparison. They both fall into the great-cover-tricks-you-into-renting-an-eye-gougingly-terrible movie category, but Dungeon Girl is far more terrible.

It's been a while since I have watched such an atrocity in film. And to think this film is a sequel to the 2003 direct-to-video killer-clown movie "S.I.C.K.". In this presentation, Mr. Jingles wreaks bloody revenge on those who put him away. One survivor has spent years in an asylum to recover from what she saw, but upon her release, Mr. Jingles returns to finish what he started.I shot a movie off of my cellphone that turns out better FX and dialogue than this movie... Actually.... I watched better movies in highschool that were done for film projects... If you want BAD EVERYTHING in a film... this is the film for you... And what's with the cheesy one-liners?