What a waste of my time!!!

Thanks for the memories!

Best movie ever!

if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

A young girl travels to Cairo to visit her father, and becomes unwillingly involved with a bizarre sadomasochistic cult led by the charismatic Paul Chevalier, who is a descendant of the Marquis de Sade. Despite his role as the menacing and horribly twisted Freddy Krueger in the Nightmare on Elm Street Series, Robert Englund was never some huge talented persona that his perfomances were made to win Oscars and unfortunately this weird, dumb and quite boring thriller that was made in the 90's is pretty damn forgettable and a waste of time to say the least.

This is one of the smaller films Tobe Hooper directed in the 80s and 90s but one of his darkest in subject matter. There are quite a few thematic links to Texas Chainsaw Massacre: we had a virginal girl getting wrapped up in an underground cabal or torture and black magic. This is not as intense but keeps you invested with its bizarre style and solid performances. Hooper fans won't be turned off by the absurd and symbolic moments, but mainstream horror fans won't get it. This is not a slasher film, but all Hooper films get unfairly graded as such. He works with very esoteric and macabre stories that are not supposed to be realistic. They are old school horror movies with a more intelligent knowledge of evil and depravity. Hooper may have topped himself 2 years later with the similar film "The Mangler" which also starred Robert Englund, who is really having fun in both films. Big recommendation to fans of David Lynch or Jess Franco, whose sometimes producer Harry Allan Towers produced this film!

"Night Terrors" is a rather decent entry in the style, even if there's some problems with it.**SPOILERS**Arriving in Egypt, Dr. Matteson, (William Finley) meets up with daughter Genie, (Zoe Trilling) while looking for a new archaeological site. Touring the city, she is then rescued from an altercation by Sabina, (Alona Kimli) a local friend of her father. As she spends more time with her, to the detriment of her friend Beth, (Chandra West) and her father, the more she begins to pull away. She begins to pill away the most when introduced to the writings of the Marquis De Sade, (Robert Englund) the famous writer, as she feels he is trying to contact her and seek out revenge for his imprisonment. Soon haunted by visions of various cult members trying to get at her, she soon learns of the true intentions behind the cult and does her best to survive the torture they inflict.The Good News: This one here wasn't that bad of a film. One of the great things about it is the gradual build-up this employs. There's a real slow approach here to it's finale, which makes it all the more suitable at the end. Things begin at a small scale, get more severe as it plows forward and eventually gets to a fever point. This is the way to do a slow-burning film, as it's the anticipation of what's going to happen next that brings in some sound suspense techniques. That it all comes out at the end, which is some of the best scenes in the film where the torture begins and the pieces from before finally come to a head in these sequences. With the real intentions of the film coming into view and the actions finally being represented, this is the film's best spot. These also come with some nice chasing to lead up to them, including a really warped spot through the tunnels underneath the city that's quite brilliant. The hallucinatory dreams and visions are all quite startling, and several can be pretty chilling. The crucifixion one in particular stands out as one of the better ones, and the later romance dream is quite nice. The fact that this also deals with the dark themes of pain and pleasure, with as recent a time as it did to come out, makes it feel quite a bit like the old-school films where it dwelled in those styles rather than avoided them. These all make the film feel much better than it should be.The Bad News: The film doesn't really have a whole lot wrong with it. The low-key nature of is perhaps the biggest flaw. There's a lot more dialog than normal, and anytime anything happens it's a big shot of excitement but then there's not a lot of emphasis placed on them. They're over quite rapidly, meaning that there's not a whole lot to get behind for those who enjoy that kind of film. There's a feeling that not a whole lot could've been shoe-horned in to up the excitement as well, since this one is pretty lean as is, but the fact that there's such a low-key feeling to this one could be something to get through for those not that interested in this style. Even more is that the action scenes do come at the end, meaning that the beginning is full of scenes that basically amount to just talking between everyone. Every now and then something happens, but there's far more of the dialog scenes and they go on longer than the action scenes, giving this something of a rough beginning to also get through. The film's other big problem is that there's way too much confusion at what happens in the end. The flashbacks to the previous time, unexplained hallucinations and the random turn are just part of what makes this confusing, and this makes it a lot harder to really understand. These, though, are the film's main problems.The Final Verdict: While not all that spectacular, this one does have enough positive points to give it a viewing. Those in the mood for the more subtle end of the genre or are fans of the style should give it a shot, while those who prefer more action-oriented films should heed caution with it.Rated R: Graphic Violence, Nudity and Language

The Marquis De Sade, Egypt, ancient Gnostic cults, Robert Englund in a dual role, gratuitous sex and nudity, murder and mayhem... on paper Tobe Hopper's Night Terrors sounds like it should be at least a fun, entertaining flick given the ingredients. It's not. It is a plot less, incoherent shambles that brings little entertainment. There is basically no plot beyond some vague stuff about a cult that follows the work of De Sade who for some unclear reason feel the need to seduce the daughter of a local Christian archaeologist and kill her. That is pretty much it- I think it has something to with the Gnostics but who knows what the writers were thinking. Most of the movie is a meandering mess as the heroine is exposed to various weirdness, dream sequences and erotic encounters, intercut with scenes of Englund as the imprisoned De Sade in the 19th century chewing the scenery. It seems like the makers were trying for something serious but whatever their pretensions were they are buried in the cheesiness, bad acting, sleaze and fake looking decapitated heads.There aren't too many good points. Robert Englund is fun to watch, as always and the lead actress, Zoe Trilling, whilst not very talented, is attractive and in various stages of undress through the movie but watching Night Terrors is a chore. At least I got to see the movie from which the "When you're as criminal as I" bit from the Australian film certification ratings guide that was on the front of so many VHS tapes from the nineties came from.