Wonderfully offbeat film!

ridiculous rating

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

My attitude to physical effort is simple : I like to watch it from the sidelines, preferably with an alcoholic beverage in my hand. In winter the drink should be hot, in summer the drink should be cool, and that's it. This has always struck me as a nicely Belgian attitude. Sadly even here in Belgium we have spoilsports who wake up at five in the morning, take a bracingly cold shower, eat a healthy breakfast of fruit and rye bread, and go train for some demanding activity. We've got cyclists, tennis players, athletes - it's all very discouraging, but what are you going to do about it ?Still, if you want to meet the better kind of masochist you need to travel north, to the Netherlands, where vast amounts of people actually LIKE skating through freezing mist. The Netherlands, and especially Friesland, harbour one of the most daunting skating races known to mankind, the "tour of 11 cities". The tour can only be organized if all weather conditions are favourable (or rather, unfavourable) enough. Each individual tour is greeted with the sort of fervent extasy rarely seen outside a mystical context, with thousands of Dutchmen flocking to the sacred territory and hoping to write history. "The hell of 1963" is devoted to one of the harshest, cruelest tours in history, the tour of 1963. It's a nice enough movie with a nostalgic and typically Dutch feel. It's at its best when showing the beautiful landscapes and towns one meets along the route. There are also a number of fine skating scenes. On the other hand it's not a daring or innovative work : the characters and storylines are familiar, and the ending is unlikely to surprise anyone who has ever seen a traditional sports movie.Here and there the movie is marred by weird little missteps. There's a handful of characters, for instance, who are supposed to represent reporters and journalists : God knows who wrote their roles or lines, it's all pointless nonsense. But as a whole the movie is entertaining enough. Also a welcome occasion to hear our fine sister language Frisian.

Yesterday I had the dubious pleasure of watching this movie. The movie portrays the adventures of four individuals during the 1963 Elfstedentocht, by far the most important skating event in the world.Without going into detail on the (rather lame) storyline, I have to say that I was deeply saddened by the whole product. While the movie has some good points (mainly the outdoor scenes, which were filmed in Lapland and sometimes gave some idea of the grueling circumstances in which the 1963 edition took place), the storyline was completely unbelievable, the acting was a farce and most of all, the complete and utter negligence of the makers regarding the use of the correct period materials and conversation was a shambles. Another review mentioned the yellow license plates, which were introduced in the early eighties, but also the cars are wrong, the telephones are wrong and the long hair of Chris Zegers is completely idiotic for that time (even the Beatles and the Rolling Stones wore suites at the time). I could go on forever but I will not because this movie does not deserve that many attention. It is just plain ridiculous. I remember the 1963 race (I was five at the time and watched parts of it on my grandfathers television set) and when I read the two positive reviews already published I felt the need to balance this plainly wrong opinions. This movie is a missed opportunity and does NOT do any justice to the epic 1963 Elfstedentocht. It might be enough to please the 5 to 9 year old but certainly anyone with some recollection of the period will be shocked.

This movie is absolutely dreadful in many ways !!a) As a movie of any kind, about any place, and about any event. (script , acting, plot, direction, etc – all are very, very poor indeed)b) an a "faction" account of a historical event (compare : depict concentration camps as holiday resorts and you get the idea.)c) as an alleged representation of a real country (a province) in 1963 (the date of the event). Go to Disney Land or another fantasy and be disappointed when seeing the real thing.If you see a commercial made by a local tourist bureau you expect that many things are made a bit "rosy" and more attractive than when you get there. Indeed, the scenes of the villages etc. are lovely …….. and false. AND INDEED, by golly, the local provincial governments (i.e. the taxpayers) DID put a lot of money in this movie. Yes, I am Dutch. Yes, I remember the winter of 1963. Yes, I myself skated on that day – although my "endurance" was a far cry from the participants of this 200 kilometers competition AND (simultaneous) "recreational" skaters. (Just a statistic: 9.862 people started, i.e. participated – 127 made it to the finish.)

I went to this movie not expecting too much and having read a review that only gave it two of five stars. Thus I was pleasantly surprised to see what a good movie Steven de Jong made of the events took place on this day in 1963 when 10.000 people started an ice-skating tour that only 69 of the tourskaters would bring to an end. The story brings four people together that have different reasons for taking part in the tour. The stories are nicely brought together. We also get a good feel of how harsh this tour was. The cinematography is on a high level and the music is great. Also good to see that a main part is spoken in Frisian as this event takes place in Friesland. I would recommend this to anyone who like to see a realistic fight for survival on the ice that brings people together in such a way that only the 11-cities tour can.