It is a performances centric movie

Intense, gripping, stylish and poignant

Absolutely brilliant

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

Its ok good acting but 9 oscars? Not that good. But sure go watch it if you like movies based on real life events

People watching "The Last Emperor" usually fall into two camps: one group who are smitten by the spectacle, lavish customs and costumes of the foreign culture; and those who find the movie wanting. I'm sorry to say I belong to the second camp.This movie comes across as a heavily exoticized melodrama, sans nuances, of the last emperor of China, Henry Pu Yi, who had a Scotsman for a tutor, lived through the demise of his Chinese/Manchurian empire, then tried to set up a new Manchukuo in China's northeast but in the end was turned into a puppet ruler by the Japanese imperialists. He eventually became a lowly gardener, reformed in a Communist labor camp.While the spectacle grand, the costumes and sets beautifully designed, and the film lavishly lensed by cinematographer Vittorio Storaro, what remains of the film is not enough to coalesce into an integrated artistic whole. "The Last Emperor" comes across as one of those exotic breed of western films which are there solely to pander to western tastes, penned by a western writer with little knowledge of Chinese or Manchu culture. It will win many awards at the Oscars, but is ultimately no better than a soulless cardboard pastiche of the real thing.First off, what's with the use of pidgin English dialogue? Out of the respect for the culture the movie really ought to be shot in the Mandarin language, not in some foreignized pidgin version of that Chinese tongue. Much of it sounds like it was dubbed during the days of Fu Manchu when China was heavily stereotyped by the West. Does this film go any further than perpetuate this stereotype?Secondly, the director shines too much of a magnifying glass over the Chinese/Manchu culture, yet many aspects coming across as inaccurate or over-fetishized. What's with the lolling breasts of Pu Yi's young nanny, her nipples constantly exposed, or his wife's translucent see-through negligee? Or the lesbian Manchurian spy nibbling the toes of her imperial mistress? They don't add anything to the narrative. And who would step into the imperial bedroom without being announced?The film is also not nuanced in its depiction of China or the people and personalities who interact with the emperor at that time. The only enlightened person is Pu Yi's Scots tutor, who introduced to him a bicycle. The consorts are a bunch of useless, tittering old hags, the Communists are largely berating, the rest of China is anonymous, largely devoid of personality. Even the prison interrogator is played with nauseating Maoist overtones by a Mao lookalike, complete with perfumed make-up and intimidating gestures.Only one or two characters from this epic drama turn the head, the prison warden is one, and Pu Yi's wife the Empress another. But the screenwriters don't develop the back stories much, which is really a shame.One good thing is the casting. The child actors playing Pu Yi are uniformly superb. John Lone too is excellent playing the lonely but manipulated emperor. Joan Chen acquits herself adequately as the empress. Given the fact they are heavily handicapped by a lackluster script, they have done well.The best part of the movie comes at the end, when Pu Yi witnesses the castigation of his prison warden during the Cultural Revolution, then gives a young red cadet a cricket canister hidden behind his Forbidden City throne. It gives a tantalizing view on what might have been if the screenwriter and the director decided to develop the script in a more nuanced manner. Yes, "The Last Emperor" may depict successfully a sad, lonely monarch of a crumbling empire, but much of it also comes across as exoticized and foreignized. And the payoff at the end is simply not enough.

This sweeping account of the life of Pu Yi (John Lone), the last emperor of China, follows the leader's tumultuous reign. After being captured by the Red Army as a war criminal in 1950, Pu Yi recalls his childhood from prison. He remembers his lavish youth in the Forbidden City, where he was afforded every luxury but unfortunately sheltered from the outside world and complex political situation surrounding him. As revolution sweeps through China, the world Pu Yi knew is dramatically upended.This is a by-the-numbers movie when comes to making a film that will most likely get you the major awards. If you like this film then check out the even longer version!If you want a Big Movie event to see then Watch "Lawerence of Arabia". There is several elements from that film that the director stole from.If you you cant find anything else to watch on TV read a book! Call a friend! Clean your closet! Plan your future! Dust! Do laundry! Clean the cat box! Clean your trash cans! Scrub the toilet! Check your smoke alarms! Call your mother. Washing out the garbage cans is more entertaining! Avoid! Avoid! Avoid!

Im too late probably. The description of his life is so dramatic. He lives in outdated castle and live in luxury, suddenly become a puppet emperor then become a prisoner, then a gardener. It is like you live in ancient china and suddenly people use internet. Everything is so pretty and so pleasing to eyes. I don't understand the whole deal about politics but the characters often do something crazy and unpredictable sh*t enough to keep my attention. Im so glad that the prison governor survive cause he is like my favorite character suddenly and if it is George martin he probably just be killed off even though the real one still alive. And the spy is sassy too