Good concept, poorly executed.

Excellent but underrated film

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

The first must-see film of the year.

It's a good thing this belated tribute to Francois Truffaut was adapted from an original story by the late director himself; otherwise the film might be mistaken for a plagiarism. The story itself is a distaff companion piece to 'The 400 Blows', following a compulsive teenage kleptomaniac in post-War France, whose sticky fingers and rebellious disposition land her in and out of jail, and in and out of love. Charlotte Gainsbourg is certainly appealing in the title role, but Claude Miller's direction is perfunctory, at best; he places each scene in the correct order but has little feeling for the material, other than an obvious respect for its author, whose name alone is enough to lend the film some token credibility. Enough incidental pleasures survive the awkward adaptation to make it a worthwhile diversion for any dedicated Francophile, and a must-see for die-hard Truffaut fans, but the film suffers from an ending that might lead viewers to suspect Miller was working from an incomplete outline.

Truffaut originally wanted to do this movie, but died. He seems to have left behind notes. What might they have contained, I wonder: "Alright, there's this young chick, and she's all horny and a juvenile delinquent and she just does what she wants. And we'll have lots of excuses for boobs and lingerie." Hat's off to the genius. This starts out pretty entertaining. A look into a girls life in France in the late 40s.But lo and behold, who would have guessed it: after 20 minutes it turns into the number 1 passion of French men: a Lolita fantasy.Yes, an insecure grown man who is very supposedly married hooks up with a teenage girl... In fact as we all know from decades of French movies this is yet another French man's wet dream brought to the screen. So was Truffaut no different? Too bad.The girl in this movie seduces the man and that makes it credible, plausible and "proof" that this is not Pedophilia. Well at least we believe it, won't we?Unfortunately it is just that: Pedophilia. There are lots of gratuitous scenes of the girl wearing lingerie etc. Of course those scenes had to be there. Otherwise we couldn't possibly have followed this deep and meaningful story... Because you know she just happens to be a kleptomaniac and she just happens to love lingerie. So she has to try on what she steals doesn't she? She could have stolen tractors or food but who wants to see her eating a baguette on a tractor, right? Right.Later on they check into 2 separate hotel rooms as father and daughter. But grandma concierge knows everything ... she doesn't really approve but hey, this is France, he's 40 and she's 16, no problem!I guess everything is fine - Charlotte Gainsbourg was SEVENteen at the time. Quite old actually to be in a French movie about defloration.If you are not convinced by the noble intentions now, there are women's prison scenes and cat fights in the movie as well.So you see, this is really just an innocent and totally non-sexist totally non-speculative totally non-exploitative look into a young girls life.

The young little thief always follow her desires.. Movies, adult clothes, losing virginity, man. It's so sexy when she change her common shoes for students into high heels..We pity her cos her family background and her mum left her, we hate her cos she stole things with no shame and I am envious of her cos she is so true and honest, she do whatever she wants. On the opposite of most hypocritical people, she is the most free bird.Actually, she is such an adorable and innocent girl with low and shy voice. It's easy to find employer, sugar daddy, boy friend and real good friend. But she still chose the way to hell. Why? I guess it's more easy to choose the old and bad habit which you were addicted to.Life is wise, when it brings temptation, it also brings test.

Very good movie. Go see it. Bittersweet, sexy, sad, funny..good casting...it's all there.