Who Pulled the Plug? 2
Who Pulled the Plug? 2
| 25 December 2006 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
Who Pulled the Plug? 2 Trailers

Andersson's boatyard remains after 25 years, still chased by the same stringent, but misfortuned debt collector. TV producer Vonna Jigert wants Andersson to compete against an Italian company and their boat Fortuna in a race on Göta Kanal – live on TV. The race is broadcasted as a reality show. Same gangly canoer like 25 years ago also has a canoeing vacation on the canal when the race starts.

Reviews
Doomtomylo

a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.

View More
Gurlyndrobb

While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

View More
Benas Mcloughlin

Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

Geraldine

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

View More
jetset_2002

This is not a movie. This is a bad draft of a bad script directed by a bad director. I seriously considered asking for my money back.The movie is bad on so many levels, but as i just saw it and are still upset i have to get a few things of my chest so i can sleep tonight without nightmares.. When she shoots the firework, where does the firework go? . Why did the bartender put the Viagra shot back on the counter? . Isn't the canonist supposed to fall into the water? Whats the fun otherwise? - Why the elements of violence? - Why the aggravated upset screaming that are not comic but just bad acting? - Why not making something funny out of härenstanms mud Hitler mustache - the only time i actually smiled in the movie? - Why not delete jokes that are so obviously lame it ruins the flow, like the taking away of the ladder? - Whats up with the two depressing girls with coffee and fishing? - He's not Italian - hes like Turkish! Italians don't wear gold chains and tacky stuff. - When the guy gets real drunk, why have him saying something negative, why not something pathetic to make it FUNNY? - Why, oh why, are people in the movie angry looking 90% of the time? - Why did the cop steal the Ferrari? Is that funny? And why the *** didn't the Italian guy take his bike, that would actually be pretty funny. - What was up with the couple in the sailboat? What was their purpose? - Why did the nerdy guy hook up with the Filmer? We don't like the nerdy guy! We must like him to like them falling in love! - The snuff scene is disgusting and stupid and makes you NOT fall in "movie-love" with the girl. - Why just relying on accents being funny without actually people saying something funny, like when the couple recognizes the limo driver on the paparazzi-shot. - HOW did she get to buy the dog? Did she turn around and go after the car with the dog? - The gay guy with the dog was the only funny character in the movie. - Why choose a director with obviously no sense of humour him self. This is "comedy" according to a child, plus spoiled by negative energy, violence and screaming. - Why a "race", they meet up at every "sluss" anyways? - Why would people watch such a boring docusope, with no elements of voting out people or drama. - Girls Don't whats docusoaps because of sex, they do it because of drama and relationship related stuff - guys like sex. - Even if they had have sex, where was the person to shoot it?Yiiiikes! Don't do it, don't see it. Ever.

View More
Ken1_311

OK now, lets see. What was funny in the first movie? I know, people with funny accents, people falling into the water, silly boat crashes and funny comments between the two teams. In this movie they have twisted the accent part to the max, no good. A whole a lot of people are falling into the water for uncertain reasons, no good. Boatcrash, check. Funny comments between the two teams, they tried but failed. Also, there are too may personalities they are following in this movie. This film should be about what is happening on the water, not on land. I am sorry to say that there is too far between the funny parts and the sponsors of the film are exploited to the max. No good. All in all, I give it four out of ten since it has some funny parts.

View More
Johan

This movie is one exception of the rule that a sequel is worser than the original. Its comedy at its best. This movie is a fast action slapstick comedy where something seems to happened every second. At more than one occasion the entire audience laughed loudly at a joke.Its a big advantage to have seen the first movie but its not a requirement.Göta kanal 2 also have the advantage of being a parody on the latest decades reality production TV series such as survivor (expediton: Robinson in Swedish) This is a Swedish movie for the Swedish audience. Thus don't see it if you aren't familiar with Sweden and its language. Otherwise: Have fun! Johan

View More
zeo-trope

The story line was very straight forward and easy to follow and contained a lot of no-brainer comedy to a point where it just got boring. Some of the audience seemed to find it funny but I like more intelligent humor.There were several known Swedish actors in the movie and their performance were decent considering the script. Lena Endre was good looking as always.I don't remember the original movie so I can't say if it's better or worse.If you enjoy movies like Sällskapsresan this movie might be worth taking a look at.

View More