Brilliant and touching

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

I just cannot believe how bad this so called sitcom is. The episodes have got more stupid and less funny as they have gone along and now I have given up watching. It's appalling !

Absolute DROSS Showing how pathetic ''comedy'' writing has become in the UK! How the hell comedy legends can pimp themselves for this UNFUNNY DROSS is beyond me SCRAP the FAR LEFT TV TAX

What to say about this train wreck that hasn't already been said? Whoever pitched this show, I hope that they were later fired. The humour and the plot is ancient! This kind of comedy was probably popular when we were painting on the walls of caves, but audiences have evolved. This is your typical sitcom aimed at elderly viewers before the watershed. I bet John Cleese probably has nightmares about this. Hold the sunset? No, make the sun set quicker on this monstrosity! The characters have about as much personality as a plank and it makes you think, "What happened to sophisticated comedy?"If I could go back in time, I would go back to when they pitched the script for this show and say "DON'T MAKE IT! This show is so dated it makes Dad's Army look like SAS: Who Dares Wins".

As an oldie I suppose I should be rising above resentment at "Hold the sunset" being denigrated as aimed at the pensioner market by a reviewer contemptuously dismissing a significant proportion of the country's population as having no cultural awareness or value,but,hey,it happens everyday on TV and wireless programmes aimed at mindless twenty - somethings with the attention span of a spaniel puppy. So I shall. Pensioners Cleese and Steadman manage to find their way round the set without falling over an achievement by itself,evidently. They are joined briefly by pensioner Egan before surrendering centre stage to Jason Watkins who isn't quite so aged - but then he isn't quite so funny either. In fact he isn't funny at all. The script calls for Mr Cleese to be good humoured,even smile from time to time. For a man whose default character setting is smug Oxbridge snob he does a good job. It is left to Miss Steadman to charm her way through the piece and make it worth watching. She and Mr Cleese are the Love Interest;a couple almost star - crossed in that their wish to be together is thwarted by the arrival of her son,a 50 year old pre - adolescent who's prime regret is not cementing a relationship he had when he was seven. He has left the marital home and gone back to mum. Bugger what she thinks or what plans she may have had. There is a word for him that is usually preceded by "Selfish". I am reasonably sure Cleese and Steadman will prevail in the end,and I will personally be very happy to see Jason Watkins sleeping rough on the streets of whatever posh borough he lives in - perhaps it's Windsor who's plans for ethnically cleansing their homeless population I would be willing - in his case - to heartily endorse.