Highly Overrated But Still Good

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

A mercenary-for-hire accepts a mission from a billionaire to capture a dangerous snake that could possibly help cure a terminal illness.What really makes or breaks this film is the awful CGI. And it breaks it, big time. The plot is okay, and the blood and gore are far better than you might expect (though some of the blood is so fake as to be comical). Those snakes... so terrible. And they do not even try to hide it, putting them on screen almost as much as possible. You can do better than that.The selling point of the film is David Hasselhoff. I am not sure how often you can say that, butt it is definitely true in this case. His character, although really more of a secondary role, is redeeming and entertaining. He loves to bite cigars and not smoke them.

After watching this one i just feel weird for half a hour.Im a great fan of Hollywood classics like Anaconda.Classic movies give a special feeling to me and just feel sympathy if some on killed and journey of characters and finally a good CGI. This movie lack all the features necessary for a snake movie.No character development and finally a WORST CGI. When seeing the snake feel a drawing and completely disappointed. Is their aim to create a low budget CGI movie at least give a good story otherwise it doesn't give anything to both Produces and viewer. I think this story can be written by any high school student even better than this one.

I don't get it, why would anyone pay to see this? David Hasselhoff is by far washed up character and after "Baywatch" there is not much to expect from him. The thing that bugs me the most with all Anaconda sequels is that the snake is all together badly described. Why? Well anyone who watched at least one documentary episode about these animals, knows how these beasts behave, and aside of the third part where these animals are DNA tampered with, not one have a good excuse for that kind of behavior. Mainly the way they move, sound and look. And than...things go from bad to worse, dude gets pierced through his chest with the snakes tail and they try to do CPR on him. Shoot me for giving this movie a try, thank God for not paying for it.

When I stumbled across this on Sy Fy and saw that the Hoff was in it I thought, proceed with caution it's either going to be good or terrible. It was terrible for the most part although did have the potential to be so much better.The film mainly consisted of the super giant snake attacking people in a variety of ways. It was far too focused on the various gruesome ways a stereo-snake could kill someone and not really on much else.Overall it was just needlessly gory.That being said I got to the end and did manage a chuckle at points so it passed the B movie test. It's watchable if nothing else is on but I wouldn't go out of your way.