Fantastic!

Absolutely brilliant

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Directed by Andy Hurst (who also was the writer of the Wild Things Series). Right from the onset the audience can tell this is a very low budget B rated film. The actors have absolutely no emotional armor to them. As an avid film watcher I like to see the actors show raw, emotional vulnerability whether it be facial, dialogue or body language. Every performer comes across rigid, flat and campy in their scenes.The editing is so choppy and bad you can tell in the opening scenes the character Brandon has a shirt on with a design on the left side, 20 seconds later in the next scene the design is on the right side, (look closely). This insight, though powerful, isn't going to turn you into an overnight editing success. There is so much to learn in terms of visual storytelling -- pacing, film language, montage theory -- techniques that have been invented, used, and transformed for over a century. Editing is no cut and paste job; it's a complicated and intricate art form, but knowing the difference between good and bad editing, especially three Oscar-winners' definition of "good" and "bad", is a great place to start. Such an absolute cheesy and abortion ripoff of 2004 Saw. The similarities are endless with a game being played between 6 individuals, weird and violent traps, gore and twists involved. Trust me when I say you are better off seeing anything but this dumpster fire.

Well, not much more I can say that hasn't already been said. Bad lines, horrible acting, you could see the ending long before it got close. Bad games, very unrealistic. chains around a door that wouldn't keep my six year old in, nobody thinks to pickup the GUN, *SPOILER* (maybe..) and the whole, "Im in the control room but I'm not gonna break everything around me" bit was just stupid. I can see why everyone is so angry, it could have been a real movie, if there was ONE competent person working for the film crew and directors. Although it was a good movie to do my homework while it was on, I got disgusted so much I quit paying attention and got my work done. Only saving grace was a FEW gross scenes, but not many. Don't waste your time unless you REALLY want to waste your time!And now, I'm off to watch "Are You Scared 2"....Looks as bad as the first so far!

Are You Scared (Review by: William Newman) The film is premised to be like the Two "Saw" film's in game wise, However the film is much more clever, the film is Adventurous, Frightening, and KA!!, The film's opening scene left me to think after seeing "Saw III" that it was "Saw IV" since most horror film's get really Brutal after the third film, The First Victim dies in a KA!! Way, of course KA means Kick Azz, Now the next scene made me like the film even more the film has it's own Characters like "Saw" did, The Detectives knows this killer's work and wants to end it after all he's killing people, Now for the main game in the film really sets the Apse in the film, the victims have Character, the brother and the sister are the main game that gets me they have to chose who will live and who will die, the Sister in the manner is the one to live her and her brother were suppose to be twins and she had to watch him die with a Drill into his forehead, that scene it's self is rated .4/.5, the man that is afraid of the Dark has to live or die in a more frightening way, Gun's are all around you and it's like wow man I can't see in the dark, one hair trigger to go!!, the film's scenes/traps are very well entertaining, some of the death's are cheesed into the film but still watch able, the film's Climax is very interesting onto whom is the cause of it all, the film is much more realistic than "Saw" so the "Saw" fans can slush it, the film is very entertaining and very Adventurous, William Newman rates this film 8/10, with saying it has more to offer than "Saw".

I caught this last night on television, and the premise sounded interesting enough, a play on peoples fear of reality TV shows. While I am a fan of some reality TV shows, I certainly recognize the inherent wrongness in some of the shows. Aside from the obvious privacy issues, where are the ethics in whats OK and what crosses the line in exploitation? Usually I would say "consent", but sometimes I wonder. In this film, the unlucky participants applied to a show titled "Are You Scared?", which to them probably meant something along the lines of the relatively harmless "Fear Factor". Alas,they are chosen when they least expected it. They were kidnapped and awoke it a run down building, trapped there by the insane host.This is a rip off of the "Saw" movies, which I found to be very unsettling because of the mean spiritedness of the Jigsaw Killer, but I was utterly bored by the dialog and acting in them. Here, the same is true for the most part, one scene with a male and female detective was enough for me to know that all subsequent scenes would be equally trite and boring, so I skipped all of the scenes containing them. I also skipped some useless scenes from the helpless victims inside the abandoned building. The actors portray stupid thoughts and actions, in particular the first person to be offed, who does not realize that his life is in grave danger, despite having a surgical scar on his body that wasn't there before, and no one considers that they were kidnapped and drugged, brought here against their will. Not even the biggest "fame whore" would approve of that I don't think. However, during some scenes, these people are likable enough, they aren't scumbags who are being taught a lesson by an insane toymaker, like in the Saw movies. They are normal, everyday folk who are being put in a situation beyond their control, and what could be scarier then that? The death scenes are suitably gruesome and ironic, according to the fear of that person. The story itself and twist ending is mediocre, and while the victims are likable, no one in the movie leaves much of an impression, well, except for one scene. There is one scene in here that terrified me beyond belief. If you don't want to be spoiled, don't read the next paragraph.When it's the twin brother and sisters turn to die, the host plays a clip of their audition video. The brother says that he is not afraid of anything, and the sisters only fear is losing her brother. The game that the psychopathic host has set up for them is of course going to play on this in a cruel way. Both are hooked up to chairs, facing each other, and the host tells the brother(forgive me for not remembering their names, though it doesn't really matter in a film like this, does it?) to press a button or they'll be disqualified. This sets off a drill saw that will bore a hole into his brain unless the sister presses a button next to her, which then sets the drill in her direction. While there are countless scenes of terrible deaths in film and especially this kind of film, this partiular scene is utterly terrifying. In this moment, and this moment only, the emotional pull you have towards the characters is very strong, and thus, the quality of the acting is very good. You an see the love that these siblings have for each other, and you can see on their faces that they realize one of them is going to suffer a horrible death. Eventually, the brother sacrifices himself so the sister can live, and the totally understandable breakdown that follows is heartbreaking. It is meant to be a standard gory death typical of this horror sub genre("Torture Porn" is an apt descriptor for most of the trash that comes from this genre), but it is set up with such surprising emotional honesty and suspense(notice the music that is played in the intermediate stage before the twin brother gets killed) that it becomes a very memorable scene in an otherwise forgettable movie.Besides that one scene, the film has not much more to offer except for a likable cast, moody atmosphere and a few interesting exploitation deaths.