Very disappointed :(

The greatest movie ever!

Really Surprised!

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

The number of laughs, chuckles, and smiles a movie classified Comedy affords me as I'm watching it and the overall feeling I have when it's ended is what determines the stars I award in my effort to encourage viewership.I'm shocked to read these old-posted reviews that say in so many words that this movie is not only not funny but also dumb, even to the point of getting 0 stars from someone. I TOTALLY DISAGREE.I had never heard of Cinderella Jones and the little information shown in the guide actually had me skipping it. However, since I'm on a comedy kick and desirous of seeing movies pre-1950 now that they're available on TCM (and I'm retired), I happened to switch channels to it 20 minutes into the film and started watching. After 10 minutes, I knew when it ended that I was going online to see if it's available for purchase. I want to see it again and I want to loan it out to others I know who enjoy a good 'old' comedy. While it goes into song a few times, you can fast-forward if that bores you. And, there's a bit of dancing...so ditto that....although I now enjoy watching dance moves, spins and taps or intended funny moves (esp. since acquainting myself with Astaire/Rogers routines.)What really makes this movie worth 8 STARS, however, is the fact that I had to press the Pause button over ten times to make a note of some clever remarks and behavior by a number of the actors/actresses that I intend to use sometime first chance I get. (SPOILER, but you'll forget) 1) A military parade is going by holding them up in traffic when they have an arrival deadline and the fabulous character actor, SZ Sakall, says "Fine time to invade California". 2) Robert Alda (Alan's father in real life) is going to the bar to set a guy straight; and, as soon as he gets there, he picks up a mixed drink, chugs it down, puts it back on bar, turns to the guy and says "Anybody drinking that?" and the guy says "Not Now!". 3) Joan Leslie gets hired on the spot as a waitress w/ absolutely no experience and no knowledge of the joint's 'lingo' in taking orders. (I barely knew what the order was w/o re- listening): "I'll have a couple of sinkers, a cup of java, save the cow (donuts, coffee, no cream) ... other guy says,"same, but shoot some chalk juice into my caffeine" (cream in coffee). Joan, of course, has no idea what they just said and guy adds "you know, bovine juice". 4) The other waitress tells her to change an order to: "take a cannibal for a walk" (hamburger to go) And, there's constant plays on words and sound-alike wrong words used by Joan (whose character had very little formal schooling) and by SZ Sakall (with his foreign accent and English translation) that I find amusing ala comedian Norm Crosby and Raising Hope's TV show Mom, Virginia in more recent times): 5) Joan: "What do you think I am, an immigrant?" (ignorant)..."Ignorance shouldn't be so bliss" (Ignorance is bliss) -----and a lot more goofy remarks that I thought were clever just to think of using them for plays on words. Sakall: "You take the words right out of my mouth...that's very unsanitary". ---and he has a ton more of sound and sight gags, as well as a minute's amusing dance for a man his age and size.While this is not an A-List of actors starring, it's all the more fun watching goofy behavior from most of the other characters who may only have a line or three in the entire movie; but, enough of those lines are clever and/or funny...which equals viewing enjoyment.Hey, watch for the airing of this movie. It's fun, funny, clever in parts, kudos to the character actors, and a pleasant viewing that I could've enjoyed seeing back to back ...had I recorded it. Yes, Joan and a few had some obvious facial overplays....so what. By the way, Joan is alive at 89 yrs.old.

This is a very, very contrived film with a very weak story idea. Considering what great films Warner Brothers usually made, the plot is amazingly poor. It's not surprising, then, that the studio held this film for a long time before it was released--as apparently they, too, knew it was a seriously flawed film.The film begins with some radio show that is looking for lost people--and in this case it's the missing heir to a $10,000,000 fortune. When Judy Jones (Joan Leslie) is located, she learns that the money isn't hers yet--she must be married by Saturday to a man of genius IQ or the money is to be given to a museum. The problem is that the only guy who might marry her is a bit of a clod--and certainly NOT a genius (Robert Alda). So, Judy decides the best place to find a smart guy is the local technical college and she manages to charm her way into be admitted to school--even though it's an all-male campus and Jones is a complete idiot (I'm talking almost a Gracie Allen-level idiot!). Will this moron get a guy by the deadline...and will the audience even care? Considering that the leading lady is annoying, dumb and pretty self-centered, I sure didn't.This film proves that even with wonderful character actors like Cuddles Sakall, Ruth Donnelly and Edward Everett Horton you CAN make a bad film. Unlikable characters, a contrived plot, bad writing and unnecessary singing make this a real dud.

Cut-rate romantic shenanigans from Warner Bros. and director Busby Berkeley features Joan Leslie as a ditsy band singer who stands to inherit $10,000,000 from a deceased relative--provided she marries a man with a high I.Q. under the deadline. Playing the kind of kooky girl who mistakes a bar of soap for cheese and thinks the 17th President of the United States was named Abraham Jefferson, Leslie's wide-eyed, open-mouthed innocent-act gets a strenuous workout here (she's nearly impossible to take). Songs by Jule Styne and Sammy Cahn aren't enough to save the picture, which shoehorns in greedy lawyers, hep-cat professors, and a penniless pianist who wants to "live on love". Poor in all respects, the film sat on the shelf for two years before Warners finally released it. They shouldn't have bothered. NO STARS from ****

Maybe it's just me, but is no one else troubled by the apparent ability of just about everyone in this movie to change who they love and whom they want to marry almost at will. No concept of everlasting love troubles the writer and certainly will not trouble any ensuing marriage that would come from this movie. I just found it disappointing. Joan Leslie is good enough, but haven't we come too far (even by 1946) than to think it's funny that women are stupid. And just too idiotically stupid to continue living. Unlike other commentators I did not think the bubbles from the mouth bit funny at all, I just thought it dumb. Which pretty well sums up the movie for me.