People are voting emotionally.

Instant Favorite.

A brilliant film that helped define a genre

an ambitious but ultimately ineffective debut endeavor.

This film is about an attractive but sexually confused new guy in town, who is pursued separately by an ex-gay couple using vastly different methods."Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds" is a lot of fun. It uses a light hearted approach to go about the topic. I like the script, it is entertaining, fun and radiates positivity. It even hits back at homophobia with style. Characters are clichéd but very likable, providing the cheesy and at times visually stimulating entertainment. Production is above average given the low budget, which is not very usual for a gay film. It's a delightful and fun film to watch, if you want a laugh.

I'm not going to bother to try and sell this movie to other viewers by pretending it's anything other than what it is, a light farce meant to appeal to guys who like watching other guys make out and take off their clothes. I saw the first one at a film festival and remembered actually laughing quite a bit, but then I was kinda drunk at the time. The humor in this sequel is a little more strained (or I was a little more sober), but the film has other virtues that make it not a bad way to spend 80 minutes on a Saturday night with some friends before you go out dancing. Get off your high horses, all you other commenters who complained about the "near constant semi-nudity" and decried the notion that people would choose to see this movie rather than other "quality" offerings. Men, and especially gay men, like skin! We like to see beautiful guys in various states of undress! And we don't always want to have to resort to out-and-out porn to see it! Has the gay population been overrun by a bunch of prudes, almost as bad as the "ex-gay" group depicted in the film? Have you become as neutered as most of "respectable" gay cinema is these days, produced by filmmakers who would rather cut off their you-know-whats before showing a naked guy and run the risk of being labeled frivolous? Watch this movie with your GAY friends if your straight ones are too uptight to deal with the stomach-licking and full frontal nudity. And try and wrap your heads around this, weenies: you can watch serious, quality films AND silly, sexy, fluffy ones. You can go see "The Queen" or "The Departed" one night and "Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds" the next. See how easy that was? The only thing that really detracted from this movie is that Marco Dapper obviously shaves his groin; men should be men, not plucked chickens. Thank you.

Lovers Kyle and Marc have a silly lover's quarrel and each go their separate ways. By chance both come upon superhot male model Troy and each is looking to nail him. For Kyle, he's even willing to go so far as to pretend to join an ex-gay campus group headed by Jacob. Troy's kind of unsure about his own sexuality. He seems one obliging dude, willing to share sex with just about anyone. This leads to a whole lot of trouble all around, but in the end all the boys and girls in the film seem to be nicely paired off. I do so love happy endings.There are lots of laughs in this film, but it actually takes a look at a very serious topic, the preying on impressionable kids just starting to find out about their sexuality by some very uptight people. There's a whole lot of new thinking about human sexuality over the past century and a half, but don't try and tell the fundamentalists anything in that regard.Best performance in the film is Scott Vickaryous as the ex-gay leader of the campus group. The unveiling of the inner Jacob is something to behold, as is the disrobing of Marco Dapper as Troy.Worth the price of admission alone.

Let's put it this way:Variety writes: "Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds" -- and the film-making continues to be just as sloppy.You can't argue with Variety, the showbiz bible. This film probably has two more laughs than the first film, Eating Out, which means it has exactly TWO laughs. Trouble is I can't remember what they are now. What I remember is some really bad acting -- just like in the first film. I remember a stupid script that could have been written by a horny gay high school student. I can't comment on the direction since there isn't evidence of any. My problem with films like this is that they create such a negative image of gays and lesbians for the straight community. The characters are stereotypes. I don't know people like the characters in this film and I don't want to. Why can't the producers of this movie use their financing powers for good?