FearDotCom
FearDotCom
R | 30 August 2002 (USA)
Watch Now on Prime Video

Watch with Subscription, Cancel anytime

Watch Now
FearDotCom Trailers View All

When four bodies are discovered among the industrial decay and urban grime of New York City, brash young detective Mike Reilly teams with ambitious Department of Health researcher Terry Huston to uncover the cause behind their violent and inexplicable deaths. The only common factor shared by the victims? Each died exactly 48 hours after logging onto a website called feardotcom.

Reviews
GazerRise

Fantastic!

Nessieldwi

Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

View More
Lucia Ayala

It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

View More
Payno

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

View More
BA_Harrison

A serial killer known as The Doctor (Stephen Rea) is streaming his gruesome handiwork live over the internet for the entertainment of twisted individuals. Meanwhile, the spirit of one of The Doctor's previous victims has set up her own online torture portal (don't ask me how), punishing those who are tempted to watch by killing them 48 hours later. New York cop Mike (Stephen Dorff) is on the case, aided by Department of Health worker Terry (Natascha McElhone).Director William Malone gave us the entertaining 1999 remake of House on Haunted Hill, but his follow-up, Feardotcom, is far less satisfying: the plot is wholly unoriginal (it's basically The Ring, with a website instead of a video, plus a bit of torture porn), the convoluted script is a mess, the performances are weak, and the whole affair is given an aesthetic guaranteed to get my goat-trite blue and orange palette, rapid editing, and lots of dark imagery with flickering lighting (just like 90% of horror films from the same decade).In the film's most ridiculous scenes, both Mike and Terry visit feardotcom.com (why the double .com? See IMDb's trivia for the lame reason) despite being well aware of what will happen to them in two days' time. That's dedication beyond the call of duty, but also pretty damned stupid. As is this film.

View More
Steve Buyer

With a whopping 3% on Rotten Tomatoes and a 5 mil. opening weekend, that says a lot about Feardotcom. With such eerie promotion coupled with a unique premise, one can only wonder why audiences did not visit the site.Feardotcom revolves around the death of a man involved in an alleged unsolved murder. The man appeared to have seen something before he met his demise. What did he see? How did this projection get there? Detective Mike and scientist Terry team up to find the murderer or shall we say "host", but in order to do so they must embark on a website that kills its viewers within 48 hours.With that plot, you would think it would be easy for screenwriter Moshe Diamant to make sense of the film. Unfortunately, that is not the case. A recurring white ball bounces back and forth and left to right with no reason. An inaudible voice is uttered from a house phone with no thought as to whose voice it belongs to. Not even the website makes sense. From the first shot to the last, it is blatant that more thought was given to the production than the script (and oh how stellar some of the hallucinatory sequences look on cellulite). Aside from a nonsensical script, the dialogue is so on the nose you would fancy why Mike or Terry never had the urge to scratch theirs. Although, the film starts off interestingly enough. The title montage is quite ominous and effectively done. Not to mention the opening scene. The train station is so deathly quiet you could almost hear cells dividing. By the time the passenger meets their fate, you cannot help but keep watching even though you know the impact beforehand. However, it would help if the film was as strong as the opening. What I will say is that Feardotcom is consistent with its suspense. There is never a scene that is terse or abrupt in creating atmosphere. Not a single room is well-lit and each minute you go down it, you feel the terror of every second. Honestly, I feel if the film were a short movie, my rating would be higher. When the characters do not speak, we have a winner. When the brightness is lowered and the apparitions take center, you cannot help but look. Unfortunately, the film has this exposition that is just pompous and unnecessary. We want to see more of the website- not see the maker of the site, and then hear the antagonist's spoon-fed motive. In brief, Feardotcom does not deserve the 3% on Rotten Tomatoes. Technically, the film is superb. It has a nice blue hue and the rain looks pretty. I cannot say the same about the script though, which is why some of the negative feedback is deserved. If you choose to visit Feardotcom (not like the rest of the United States), you will be treated to some creepy and fascinating imagery. But if you choose not to visit the site, you would have probably made the right choice.

View More
kirawolfcub

I saw this movie late one night where a friend and I decided to hold a bad movie night. In a way we got with we wanted. The scares are cheap and easy to guess, the actors all seem like they wish they could escape from it, and one of my biggest problems who the illness they decided to give the ghost girl Jean Marie. I will give hemophilia does make an interesting weakness for a person to have, but it's like that writers just heard of it and decided 'perfect! this is what we're gonna go with'. For starters it's a sexist submissive gene, meaning that woman are usually carriers where men are affected. You have to be super unlucky as a woman to get it. Second, they play it up to that Jean was just afraid of sharp things cause she could bleed to bleed id she cut herself. Hemophiliacs can bleed to death from bruises without their meds. So the fact that they claim she was tortured for hours is just crap.It was a movie with potential but it failed to deliver.

View More
kdsteel1234

I brought this today with not looking at the reviews on here as i now try not to be influences by what people say before i watch the film, so when i did finally come on here to read the comments I was astonished to find it was rated so low. This is similar to Untraceable about the Internet and what its potential can cause somebody , This had the potential to be such a great film as there was a good story and background but the ending ruined it for me so crappy Nothing remotely scary about it If you wish to view it then do There's nothing wrong with it just not as good as it could be So because of the horrible ending And minor scary effects I rate this A 4 overall

View More