People are voting emotionally.

Dreadfully Boring

Awesome Movie

Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

I saw this screened at the 2014 Pordenone Silent Film Festival (Le Giornate del Cinema Muto) and am still grasping for ways to describe it adequately. It plays fast and loose with time, spatial dimension, surrealism and doesn't so much break down the fourth wall as completely smash it apart.Just when I think I've seen at least a representative selection of everything that was made during the silent era, up pops something to show me that there was no limit to the inventiveness and ingenuity on display at that time. Aside from CGI, within a few short years of cinema's inception they really did invent pretty much everything we now take for granted.This is one of the occasions when one of F. Gwynplaine MacIntyre's reviews can actually be taken at face value. He describes the film accurately enough and genuinely appears to have actually seen it, but no mere words could do this 28 minutes or so of inspired, madcap lunacy justice. It does bear strong comparison with the British "Pimple" comedy shorts being made by Fred Evans around the same time. Though the Pimple films I've seen so far are amongst my very favourite silent film offerings of all, in many ways this surpasses them in almost every regard.As of the time of writing, this comedy masterpiece is unavailable, outside of a festival screening or visit to an archive. Hopefully that won't always be the case.My verdict? Much, much more please!

I laughed uproariously throughout this 1914 Vitagraph comedy, which deftly parodies the excesses of earlier film (and stage) melodramas. In the present day, there's an unfair perception that silent-film acting was exaggerated and lacking any subtlety. In fact, only a small minority of (mostly lesser) silent films are guilty of that charge. 'Goodness Gracious' features intentionally exaggerated acting and broadly improbable plot twists, clearly establishing that overripe acting and plot coincidences were already recognised as clichés as early as 1914.Clara Kimball Young, batting her eyelashes even faster than Bernadette Peters, plays Gwendoline, an innocent(?) heroine who seeks a livelihood in the big city. She's briefly employed in a 'bucket shop' (a crooked brokerage house) and arouses the attention of a moustache-twirling top-hatted villain (played by her real-life husband James Young). After temporarily escaping his clutches, she finds gainful employment in the firm of a dry-goods millionaire (James Lackaye). The millionaire's youthful son Cornelius (played by Sidney Drew, well into middle age) falls in love with her ... but his father disapproves of their marriage, and he cuts off Cornelius with only a shilling (24 cents, it says here in the titles). The villain arrives, murders Gwendoline's employer (just temporarily, mind you) and frames Cornelius for the crime. Will true love triumph?The film's plot is (intentionally) ridiculous, including a two-year jump in the action at one point. What makes this movie hilarious is the deft overplaying of all concerned, plus some incredibly broad sight gags. When Gwendoline strolls through the 'park', we see her standing in front of an obvious painted backdrop on an indoor stage. One of the trees is following her: the villain has got his own portable tree! This may be the cinema's earliest example of the gag (later used by Chaplin in 'Shoulder Arms') in which someone disguises himself as vegetation. This film also features one of the earliest movie appearances of Sherlock Holmes; here, he's the detective commanding a squadron of sub-Keystone Cops.Despite that one phony outdoor set, there are in fact some very interesting shots of rural Brooklyn here, including Sheepshead Bay. The movie climaxes with a spirited chase through a tenement, with most of the cast clambering in and out of a dumbwaiter shaft. (Anybody here remember dumbwaiter shafts? Modern audiences will wonder what that thing is.) There's a gag involving a Chinese laundryman that avoids the usual ethnic stereotypes. My only complaint about 'Goodness Gracious' is that the film places a lot of emphasis on undercranking, to speed up the action. I've never understood why an action that isn't funny in itself is supposed to become funny just by speeding up. Fortunately, the acting, the scriptwriting, and the gag titles in 'Goodness Gracious' are extremely funny, and I'll rate this delightful comedy 9 out of 10.