Better Late Then Never

Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

This movie was perhaps the worst film I have ever seen in my life... I can think of no comparison and I've seen some pretty painful stuff...Id say this was a spoiler alert but it really isn't... within the first 5 minutes the entire main cast dies and they are replaced with even worse actors....This movie was so painful to watch that me and my other two college friends had to amuse ourselves with something. So we just ended up laughing the entire time at this piece of garbage.If you want a movie that is so horrible that you have to laugh.. watch this one

I rented this movie Winter break of my junior year to celebrate exams being over. I'd heard about this movie while researching the infamous Sawney Beane, so I decided to check it out. The 1st 10 minutes were boring, but then it got good. Lots of gore. But as the movie went on......plot-holes. I mean, she finds a random huntsman like dude. WTF, where'd he come from?! The only good scenes in the flick were the scissors, and anything with Vaz or Erika in it.But, they could've done better. Location wise. Mojave desert?! The true Beane Clan lived in Scotland. Dammit Leigh, get it right!! Though Sawney acted like I imagined him too, all perverted and whatnot. XD Vaz Andreas was so hot in it. Seriously, he was sexy. And Erika Rhoby was as adorable was she was hungry. Heather Confornto was not a very good actress though. They could have found someone better.

This is just a comment to the guy who flipped out and cried libel to this film: it says on the box that it's a rehash of the story that inspired The Hills Have Eyes. No libel there--the box says what it is; it's a movie about the inbred family that ate people in caves... the same family who inspired both Hills Have Eyes films. I just wanted to clear that up for everyone. I haven't seen this movie YET. I am going to rent it eventually because I think it looks like fun. I dig horror movies that a lot of people view as shoddy and uninspired. By the by, I was QUITE impressed with the remake of the Hills Have Eyes. I think the boys who did High Tension did a magnificent job with it. I've got to admit, though, that the animal violence made me cry not once, but twice. So, again: this movie isn't libel or a ripoff: it's another take on an actual story. Amazing how the same psychopaths can inspire more than one movie, isn't it?

Alright, I was in Blockbuster today on my lunch break and spotted to preview sleeves for this (both copies were actually rented out). It claimed to be the tale that inspired the Hills Have Eyes. Um, WHAT?! That is the most bogus claim I've ever read! Hey director/script writer: watch the documentary on the original Hills Have Eyes (1977) 2-disk by Anchor Bay. In it, Wes Craven states that the inspiration for the Hills Have Eyes was a cave-dwelling medieval (sp?) family in the British Isles (the Seaney-Beane family I believe). Wes Craven should sue the hell out of the "production company" of this "film" for libel! I am insulted that anyone would try to cash in on film-renters' ignorance of a subject by just plain lying. I came across another video box for "When A Killer Calls" which claims to be more like the urban legend (the babysitter and the man upstairs) than the original When A Stranger Calls. RUBBISH! I CALL SHINANIGANS!!