Wonderful character development!

Brilliant and touching

One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.

Blistering performances.

This movie was, without a doubt, the absolute worst I have ever seen. I'm amazed that it made it onto the big screen... on the other hand, maybe it didn't make it onto the big screen; maybe it went straight to DVD. It is really very bad. What a shocker... I now find out that I have to write 10 lines of comment on this deplorable failed effort at entertainment. The acting was embarrassingly bad. The cast looks, AND acts, like maybe they are friends and relatives of whoever was behind this. I've seen better acting in high school plays, seriously. Those friends and relatives then wrote the glowing reviews wherein 8 of them rated the *cough cough* 'movie' a 10 (on a 10 scale) and 7 more rated it a 9... UNBELIEVABLE!

My girl friend and I saw Livin by the Gun at the Twain Harte Festival. We really enjoyed it. It reminded me of the new True Grit, with a few differences. Both movies were period correct. The characters, from extras to main actors were realistic. The characters in Livin by the Gun reminded me of the characters in the HBO series Deadwood. They weren't glamorous. They were rough and real. The locations in both movies looked authentic and added to the story. The camera work was better in Livin by the Gun, in setting the mood of the story. The sound track of Livin by the Gun was outstanding and helped to add to the major difference between the two movies, which is, Livin by the Gun has way more emotion. It even made my girl friend cry.

. The title, Livin' by the Gun, identifies the film as a morality play, so even before the violent opening sequence, we expect that the hero will also die by the gun. The story is similar to the arguable exemplar of the genre, George Stevens' Shane: a noble man turned gun fighter and trapped by his past. In Stevens' version the gun fighter is sympathetic because he exemplifies the 40s-50s hero—a man of integrity, alone, misunderstood, yet of high moral character. Miller's protagonist, Uncle, however, is considerably more complex. He spends a good deal of his life as a gun for hire, apparently frighteningly indifferent to the suffering of others. In fact, in countless scenes he shows little or no emotion as he plies his ruthless trade. At one point, Uncle shoots two young bounty hunters who are trying to apprehend him. The callow youths do not die immediately or easily, so after they endure a night of unspeakable suffering, Uncle dispatches them quickly, perhaps to put them out of their misery, or possibly because their constant moaning is an annoyance. At this point, we are not sure whether Uncle is a cold-blooded sociopath with poor impulse control, or a man trapped by circumstances. Perhaps he still possesses a divine spark that if nurtured, could lead him to nobility. As it turns out, Uncle is indeed transformed into his better self, at least temporarily, through the love of a hooker with a heart of gold, and the kindness of a God-fearing, elderly, Christian couple, but alas, it is too late. The die has been cast. Uncle's niece is mistakenly convinced that he is the source of her family's dire straits, so early in the film she sets out on a parallel path to avenge her family. A young girl alone in woods, armed, and searching for the object of her revenge will inevitably be put in the position of defending herself and others. Soon her body count, including unintended victims, rivals her uncle's. Yet she, too, is temporarily redeemed by love, and like her uncle reverts to relying on her earlier limited problem solving set (kill it) when life's vicissitudes bring bitter disappointments and injustices that are just too much to bear.Miller's film brings to mind Sam Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch. Released in 1969 it set the standard for cinema violence. While Miller doesn't rival Peckinpah in number killed, his percentage of the cast killed is very high. I counted thirty-two killed and I'm sure I missed some. So why all the violence? Everyone knows that if you live by sword, you die by the sword. We knew that before the film started. Yet the atomistic myth of self-reliance that exemplifies the genre too often overlooks the compelling evidence that man is a social animal in a social setting, and the decisions about how we live our lives has a ripple effect. If violence is one's only or preferred solution set, it's impossible to know the limit of those who will be affected. Miller's story reminds us of the collateral damage that such an approach to life will of necessity inflict. The lesson is as old as the scene in the Garden of Gethsemane and as modern as reoccurring present-day tragedy of the toddler killed by a drive-by shooter aiming for a rival gang member. So, if you're squeamish regarding film violence, be prepared to spend a good portion of the film with your eyes covered.Miller's love of the Gold Country shines through the mud and the mayhem much as Woody Allen's love of Manhattan does in his films. Like some Coen Brothers films, the location plays an integral and major though silent role; it is ever present, impossibly beautiful, and in marked contrast to the death and ugliness of soul perpetrated by the human members of the cast. Another delightful surprise was a haunting and skillful original score and engaging vocals.So if you're looking for a slick Hollywood production complete with movie stars or a 50's type western, this will not be your cup of tea. If what you want is a truly beautiful film with an excellent score then Livin' by the Gun is for you.

I loved this movie! It was the high light of the Film Fest Twain Harte. One of the best westerns I've seen. It was pure, authentic and intense. The protagonists were great, menacing yet tenderly human. I loved the themes of simplicity, with dialogue and story. I loved the portrayal of these people's simple faith as exemplified by the Fords. This was how these pioneers made sense of their lives, lives that were brutal, harsh and often short. The sets,costumes and music were terrific. The camera work was outstanding. The technology( guns,bridles, saddles, etc.) were accurate and in keeping with the period.All great westerns are about good, evil and big emotions. Nothing existential or imbued with heavy doses of psychology. Great movies move you emotionally and this movie is no exception. Well done!