Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.

It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

It is both painfully honest and laugh-out-loud funny at the same time.

The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Do you want a twisty mystery that will keep you guessing until the last moment? Do you want to see a stomach-churning "get rid of the bodies" scene? Do you want to watch an arrogant big-shot get his? Do you want to see some erotic moments? If so, this movie is for YOU. David is a writer's agent, driven but not very observant, not until it's too late. He buys this terrific apartment in NYC, but it has a history. It also has people trying to get hold of it, who stalk David. The plot on this is much meatier, but I don't to give too much away. Plot holes? A few. Obvious? You think so, don't you? Acting? A bit over, but I REALLY liked David going over the edge with Audrey. Setting? Good NYC moments, though 2007, so not gritty enough for me. Music? Adequate. Action? A ton. I think you'll really like this one.

I'm surprised there are so many really good reviews of this movie. It really wasn't THAT great. I viewed it on late night cable and honestly, I'm glad I did, as I don't think it's something I'd want to pay money (other than the cable bill) to see.I will give it credit in that it is suspenseful and generally entertaining. In fact, it was all good until the end, when we find out what is going on, and when what can only be called giant, gaping plot holes are revealed.(WARNING: SPOILERS FROM HERE)For example, we discover in the end that many of characters are in fact desperate NYC actors who were hired by the main character's secretary to psych him out. At first glance, it seems implausible that all these actors are willing to be on-call twenty-four seven and are able to improvise their parts flawlessly for the entire length of the movie without really questioning why they're doing what they are; however, I guess it could happen, so I suppose you could suspend your disbelief.However, it gets a bit ridiculous at the end of the movie. David Lamont (the main character) and the detective (who isn't actually a detective, but an actor playing one) get into this fist fight as Lamont thinks the detective is the killer and the detective tries to act the part by trying to kill Lamont. For some reason, though, at no point during this 5- 10 min fight scene, does the actor playing the detective stop trying to kill Lamont, even as he is being beaten, battered, and eventually, thrown down a flight of stairs to his death. This one is hard to swallow. I realize the character is suppose to be a desperate out of work actor, but none of the actors I know are so desperate that they would actually risk their lives in a death match and try to commit murder all for that big break. I'm pretty sure in the real world, after the first punch was thrown, any sane individual would say "screw this, I'm going back to waiting tables." The guy has plenty of opportunities to walk away, but even after he is seemingly knocked unconscious, he gets back up and continues to lunge himself at Lamont until his untimely end.The movie proceeds downhill from there, as Lamont decides instead of calling the police, as any rational person would do, he will take the body to a farm and hack it into pieces to feed to the pigs. However, I'm thinking "isn't this guy suppose to be a mystery novel agent? Surely he must realize that although it may "look" like he is guilty of the murders in the movie, modern forensic science combined with decent detective work could likely implicate the real killer (and that by covering up, he's only making it 100 times worse?)" All in all, I think I would have actually enjoyed this movie if only it had a plot that was a little bit more feasible. It had all the elements of a good movie - good acting, sets, suspense - in my opinion, however, the unbelievable script, let it down in the end.

While I can accept the cheap Hollywood horror movie clichés that are rampant in this movie, I can not accept the ending of the movie which, when I had time to think on it, I was not be able to unravel how the perpetrator was able to manage to do what she did. I read what others had said about the end being a surprise. Fine, I was surprised but the more I thought about who the villain was the less and less probable the plot became. She simply could not have manipulated that many factors and gotten away with her crime. The ending, which is supposed to make clear all the plot twists, goes so fast that it didn't allow me to absorb how it was possible for anyone to do what she did. So I concluded that it simply would have been impossible. What a gyp! The only reason I gave this movie a 4 was that it has no pretense of being anything other than a B film and it wasn't totally boring.

This movie was a disappointment. Characters do not act like normal people and there are too many things that just do not make sense. If you are a fan of horror movies, you are by now used to it and this shouldn't bother you. There are many cheap scares and startling noisy scenes, so if you are watching a movie for that, you will get it. However, if you think this movie will be worth thinking about after you stopped the DVD, sorry, you will be disappointed. Your intelligence is insulted through the whole movie. The main character who is supposed to be a very intelligent person acts throughout a movie like an adolescent who just wrecked his parents' car. He trusts people who any normal individual would distrust and looses all reasoning abilities after about 10 minutes of the movie. The acting was bad even for a low budget movie. Don't waste your time watching this.