Lost in Space
Lost in Space
PG-13 | 03 April 1998 (USA)
Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream thousands of hit movies and TV shows

Start 30-day Free Trial
Lost in Space Trailers View All

The prospects for continuing life on Earth in the year 2058 are grim. So the Robinsons are launched into space to colonize Alpha Prime, the only other inhabitable planet in the galaxy. But when a stowaway sabotages the mission, the Robinsons find themselves hurtling through uncharted space.

Reviews
Supelice

Dreadfully Boring

Organnall

Too much about the plot just didn't add up, the writing was bad, some of the scenes were cringey and awkward,

View More
Maleeha Vincent

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

View More
Dana

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

View More
turnbull50

I have been watching and enjoying this film today on the SYFY channel and thought the beginning pretty exciting especially the spider attack on the other spaceship. I quite like the time travel theme and the conclusion. At least in my opinion it was a very enjoyable film. The cast all played there parts well the special effects on par with Star Trek The Next Generation. The CGI creature which I thought good for the time seemed to be modelled on the creature in the puppet series Fireball XL5.

View More
pizzamutti

Besides the horrible actors and extremely bad dialog, nothing realy makes sense. Good CGI and a big budget, ruinned aka. tossed into the hands of a SYFY Channel like director... just ...no. Well here are some extremely annoying examples after just watching 2 episodes, I had to turn this dissapointment off after wasting 2 hours of my life. It started off interesting until they landed on a planet which is so damn cold that water freezes instantly, yet they don't wear hats and leave their jackets wide open.... not like it's cold huh.... they dont show any sign of freezing and the woman who broke her leg is somehow still alive after her daughter just cutting open wounds into her legs at a temperature of about minus 60-80° celcius. The second thing that made me real mad was when the dude of the 2nd crew which got mentioned, looked into his spyglasses inside of a swiss/canadian like landscape, but out of nowhere they somehow put a completely different image which wasnt even nearly looking like the place they are in, the whole background dissapeared and skies turned blue just like a sunny day in texas....like... how can a director be so damn bad and not see these horrible, horrible mistakes .

View More
TheLittleSongbird

Although very fond of the original TV series from the 60s, especially the first season, it is by no means a perfect show and is pretty uneven. It was great and more when at its best (the whole of the first season) but it was near-embarrassing at its worst (the second half of Season 3).Still it had memorable characters (Dr Smith a genre landmark character), a good cast (Jonathan Harris is unforgettable), an endearing campy charm, a dark seriousness in the first season without forgetting to be fun and inventive stories and monsters that made the most of an at the time unique concept. There are worse TV-to-film translations around than 1998's 'Lost in Space', such as 'My Favourite Martian', 'Dragonball: Evolution', 'The Last Airbender', 'The Dukes of Hazzard' and 'The Avengers' (1998).'Lost in Space' however is still one of those films that has its moments and a few good qualities, but one where it has great talent on board yet manages to make one question its existence. Before those defending the film arrogantly accuse people of being too stuck in the past and refusing change, actually there is far more to the problem than it being a disappointing adaptation of the show, in fact that's the least of its problems and while not a terrible film on its own terms it's a long way from good (personal opinion of course).That it has a darker tone than the show, although some critics may disagree, is not the problem necessarily, and actually people would have appreciated the bigger, opened up approach (with technology having advanced a lot since the 60s it was necessary). The first season had a serious, dark tone too (even if fans remembered the campy charm of Season 2 and the over-the-top silliness of Season 3 a little more, judging by the word campy is often thrown around describing the show). The difference was that it didn't take itself too seriously and still managed to be entertaining and inventive. The film version, to me and fans/critics (this is what is meant by this criticism, so contrary to it being a seemingly misleading criticism it's a valid one to me), strips away the fun, loses the charm, takes itself too seriously mostly and has very little imaginative or original about it. It just felt charmless and dreary.Not without its bright spots. It is stylishly and atmospherically photographed and the Jupiter II setting is very cool and the most imaginative the film gets. Some of the special effects are good if never spectacular. The music score has creepiness and gives 'Lost in Space' some energy. 'Lost in Space' gets off to a promising start and gives one the impression "hey this may not be so bad after all", and there are a few nice adrenaline jolts in the action.Casting has its high spots. The best of the lot is Gary Oldman, who actually looks like he's having fun and gives a different, darker and more menacing Dr Smith and it actually works (even though wildly different). Matt Le Blanc may have moments where he's a little smug, which is due to him having some of the worst of the dialogue, but he does have a likable charm too and has a few amusing moments. Jack Johnson is neither too cloying or grating and the characterisation of the Robot is spot on.However, the rest of the cast don't work. William Hurt couldn't have been a blander choice for Professor Robinson, he sleepwalks through his role which cried out actually for the involvement of Bill Mumy. On the other side of the spectrum, Lacey Chabert irritates to a mind-numbing degree and, although the film does try to develop her with particularly those video diaries, she is little more than a stereotypical teen at the end of the day. Mimi Rogers has nothing to do and Heather Graham also grates and has non-existent chemistry with Le Blanc.While 'Lost in Space' is not a bad-looking film on the whole, there are a lot of cheap-looking costumes and some noticeably poor special effects. Particularly for that interminable Space Monkey (Blarp? who is actually for me far more annoying than Jar Jar Binks) and for Smith's spider form (some of the worst spider effects on any visual media, almost as bad as spiders from low-budget SyFy/Asylum films and the infamously terrible ones in the 'IT' mini-series). Really hated the end credits too, they go well overboard with the nausea-inducing surrealism and the overbearing music and as an epileptic it made me feel uncomfortable.Despite some intriguing moments and sporadic amusing moments early on, most of the script (especially for the characters played by Le Blanc and Graham and in the third act) is in 'Batman and Robin'-like cornball and cringe territory. Target audience is an issue, being too silly and trying too hard and failing to be cute for adults and with heavy-handed sermonising and family values to appeal properly to younger children, who will also find some of the ideas (like the time travel elements and most of the final third) going over their heads (and no this is coming from somebody who finds children's taste and intelligence for film under-estimated).The film is far too long and drags to dreary degrees in most of its later stages. Most of the time things are taken too seriously and fun and charm can barely be seen anywhere. Then there is the final act which undoes 'Lost in Space' significantly, where things just get weird, tonally muddled, nonsensical and borderline incoherent, far more so than the second half of Season 3 of the show.Overall, not THAT bad but very lacking in most departments. 4/10 Bethany Cox

View More
westley34

This movie is downright awful. The special effects looks like a video game, even worse than most Syfy channel movies. Matt Leblanc was terribly miscast, he was laughable as Don West. The acting of many of the supporting actors was sub par for a fairly big budget movie with some pretty big name actors. Will Robinson's acting was either particularly bad or just unrealistic. There was no fear or sense of urgency present at all in him as he decommissioned the robot and saved his family and the space ship, as if he were just strolling in the park. I understand he is just a child actor but there are child actors that could have conveyed a sense of urgency there that would have been more fitting to what was happening (his entire family was seconds away from being slaughtered and he himself had just dodged death dealing rays from the robot). Maybe it was just really bad directing that caused him to act that way, but the end result is just another bad scene in a long line of bad scenes. I was being generous giving this 2 stars.

View More