Good , But It Is Overrated By Some

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.

Spoiler Alert!!! It's really nothing but a bunch of recycled footage of scared people at the beach and the shark attacking on the surface. Like Jesus even I could get better shark footage in my bathtub with a robotic shark! Seriously these shark attacks are absolutely fake. The only 2 good attacks were when the guy jumps into it's mouth and the guy drives right into it's mouth. These two were really the only good moments in the whole movie. The rest was an utter disappointment, the lead girl wasn't even acting it looked like she was on the verge of laughing the whole time and it gets annoying pretty quick. I also like how it ends because it uses the quote of Liam Neeson in Star Wars Ep. 1 "There's always a bigger fish!" I give it a 2 out of 10 because of those two funny shark attacks and the brilliant ending.

Let me tell you a story. Once upon a time a boy called Rhys Mogg was listening to Cannibal Corpse to help him go to sleep after a long day farting. He looked into his toilet a saw a great big poop. Out of the blue, Blaze Bayley came along and said 'OC vomit or shotgun' and lots of gummy bears came out of the skylight and consumed him.This movie reminded me of this story. It shows the horror of being consumed alive and is an inspiration to anyone who has ever been digested. The special effects are so well done that I started crying. I do not cry easily, the last time I cried was when my mother had me aborted. The acting is so realistic that I though it was a real story and was shocked to find that it is fact not a documentary, or say my friend told me. I sacrificed a baby to the great lord Satan to find if my friend was speaking the truth, and to my dismay I found out that there are indeed actors in this movie. If you ever have a chance to see this movie, I would highly recommend it as it is a modern classic and a masterpiece, up with the greats like 'The Hero of Colour City' and 'Spy Kids 4'. This is a great movie for kids who love such films like 'A Serbian Film' Just don't forget to look out for Blaze Bayley as I heard he is now shoving bran flakes into peoples eyes. A bit violent if you ask me.

I know that "dangerous animals-movies" is a bad genre in general but sometimes everyone involved at least try. Not this time...Not ONE scene in this movie really makes sense, i honestly think this was intended to be a joke. First of all it is basically a porn-movie between the actual porn-scenes, kind of the "foreplay" all the time and all the "actors" look like if they were in that business prior to this movie. Quality-wise it just isn't more skillfully done than that concerning acting and all round atmosphere and setting..But since it is supposed to be something else it just doesn't work, it is your total "turkey"-movie. Already in the first scenes this became rather obvious when the cigar-smoking captain comes in and with the dubbed voice sound like the cartoon figure "Popeye" or something. The museum janitor that sounds like if he is dead drunk (perhaps he was, maybe that made it funnier to participate in this farce...) Then when Ben (Barrowman) is given coffee at the bar in the beginning he is served by one lady in the first angle but in the second it is another lady (you can tell because in the second angle she isn't wearing that white pearl arm brace any longer...) And then when the nude couple are taking a swim (not only that obviously) and the Meg appear to tare the tiger shark into pieces it later lies on the beach without as much as a scratch... Then on to the pot-smoking computer-supervisors or whatever it is...These are just a couple of scenes that no one else seem to have commented on. This movie could be entertaining as comedy indeed but if you think of watching it to be enriched (or scared) in some way, just forget it. If the crew attempted to make horror, too bad for them, this movie is as crappy as they come, i cant even understand who would produce mind-poison like this. Actors who cant find the word "actor" in a dictionary and just want to fool around and use nasty language it seems like. The plot? No, don't even think about it...The scriptwriters must have come up with this in one afternoon at the most. As i said, not one scene is flawless but others have commented enough on most things so i wont do it too. Another strange thing is that in the Shark Attack movies the sharks have also started to sound like an entire lion zoo... Not one character is something else than a complete caricature. Should you give this movie a miss? To quote one character: ABSO-F-CKING-LUTELY!

Christopher Nolan's 2010 film 'Inception' received nearly unanimous critical praise for its "groundbreaking" conceit that took the characters through multiple layers of dream states. It is perhaps the greatest travesty in cinematic history that David Worth's "Shark Attack 3: Mega Inception" (incorrectly printed on some discs as "Shark Attack 3: Megalodon") not only delved into the same conceptual waters nearly a decade prior, but trumped Nolan's pedestrian approach to the concept. Worth's film is far more audacious and effective than Nolan's cheap rip-off in two key ways. First, it dispenses with the tedious exposition of explaining the multiple dream layer conceit and instead plunges the viewer directly into the dream worlds. Second, instead of offering a mere four "levels" of nested dream states, SA3:MI has perhaps dozens of dream "levels" that challenge the viewer to unravel their depth on our own. I believe it is precisely these two reasons that some unsophisticated movie goers simply didn't 'get' Worth's powerful achievement and tried to experience this surreal masterpiece as a single narrative taking place in a single reality. It seems impossible to believe that any attentive viewer could miss the myriad techniques Worth employs to literally and figuratively shout his message that his characters are dreaming, and are (perhaps) themselves a manifestation of another's dream: the titular shark changing in size from scene to scene and even shot to shot; the brazen use of stock footage mixed with Worth's; repeated interlacing of moving wide shots with rock solid close-ups; slightly de-synchronizing of audio dubbing in random scenes; freezing the frame to a black and white 'photo' when characters snap pictures; the "magical" transfer of data from an untethered digital camera to a PC. Nowhere are the dream elements more perfectly presented than the "shark attack" scenes. Note that Worth's diabolical genius has taught me not to assume that there is a physically manifested "shark" or that it even "attacks" in any visceral sense. These sequences throughout SA3:MI are intricately constructed to tap into the deepest fears of humanity in ways that no other contemporary film has achieved. The "growling" of the "shark," the shifting of "species" from one shot to the next, the use of a crudely constructed "fin" revealing the shark is only a narrative construct. These elements are just the tip of the dream iceberg. Consider the tendency of victims to throw themselves or drive vehicles directly into the "shark's" "mouth." Is this creature the sum of all our unconscious fears? Do these fears engulf us against our will, or do we engulf ourselves? By giving ourselves over to the predator, do we "kick" back up to the next dream level, freeing ourselves from the trap of our subconscious minds? Or perhaps we are the predator, preying on the humanity of others by devouring their raw fears? SA3:MI will not resort to providing cheap, pre-packaged answers to these questions. It demands that we plumb the depths of our own souls for those answers. No other film in history has so artfully challenged the viewer to swim in a virtual ocean of subconscious experiences and determine if he is making his way toward the surface or in fact diving deeper towards new and amazing discoveries.