Am I Missing Something?

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

I would come home from high school and watch and new episode once it came out.The Suite Life and Wizards and Waverly Place made me love comedy more than ever when I was younger I will never forget that them two shows mean a lot to me.

the first few shows are painful to watch their so bad. But as the writers find their feet and get use to the characters the middle shows are quite good. Some even in the classic category, where episodes do spoofs on classic movies and TV shows, having Gavin Maccleod on one episode was genius. I've always had a crush on Bailey, her face has very classic lines, speaking of classics. I read in a newspaper that TV shows go through four stages, stone age, classic, byzantine, and I think space age or something, and towards the end that's what happened to this show, they started running out of ideas, and they couldn't figure out what to do next.

While my opinion doesn't affect the show, I will say it anyway. As with almost every show geared towards teens, it could have been a lot better.The thing that infuriates me most is the characters. Surprisingly Zach annoys me less than what I would have thought, in fact I would say he is the best character and he is only getting better (however, Dylan does get ridiculous story lines like in 'Breakup in Paris'). Cody is frustrating, he whines way too much. Still funny, but a bit extravagant if you ask me. London, while albeit funny as well, her air-headedness is taken to the extreme. She wasn't this bad in the first season of the original Zach and Cody. I also can't stand the way she makes fun of Ms. Tutwiler, her teacher. Erin, who plays Emma Tutwiler is a beautiful woman, and in no way is she ugly! How can her students get off with making fun of her? It shouldn't bother me, but it does.As for Woody, Kirby, and Marcus – they are unnecessary characters. Zach is already a bit ditzy, and London completely daft. When you put in Woody and Kirby, it is just foolish. They add nothing to the show. We could have had great supporting characters like Esteban (not saying bring him in the show but someone like him). And Marcus, he just popped up out of nowhere and there is nothing special about him.I like Bailey but I am tired of the excessive talk of home life back in Kettlecorn. She is a less than mediocre replacement of Maddie.The reason for my high rating is because it is an entertaining show, stupid, but something to laugh at.

London is dumber! Woody is somehow smarter than London, which I originally thought was impossible! But still pretty awesome!!! The episodes where characters of the original show (The Suite Life of Zack and Cody) were the worst, well, I kinda liked when Esteban (Julio Ricardo Montoya de la Rosa Ramirez) came on the show for that one episode. More inappropriate for the little kids, as it has some sexual reference (ex. Zack ripping off the girls shirt, and when Woody asks how they have a baby and their teacher says "that's another class", etc). I can see a PG13 to R rated theatre movie coming where there will probably be some sex and/or nudity (like girl on girl, Bailey on London). Anyway, I'll just stop talking about sex and just say 9/9, 4/5