Very well executed

Good start, but then it gets ruined

Blistering performances.

The acting in this movie is really good.

Producer: Tom Blakeley. A Blakeley's Films Production. A Mancunian Film Corporation Production, released in the U.S.A. by Governor Films: May 1964. No New York opening. U.K. release through Planet: 23 June 1963. Never theatrically released in Australia. 7,210 feet. 80 minutes. (Available on an excellent Odeon DVD).SYNOPSIS: A kidnap plot goes terribly awry.NOTES: John Gregson was sitting on top of the world in 1953, thanks to "Genevieve: which catapulted him, Kenneth More and Kay Kendall to international stardom. Oddly none of the trio's sudden movie success lasted much beyond the 1950s. Kay Kendall died in 1959, and film producers forsook both Gregson and More, when it seemed the picture- going public had tired of them. More's last big success was in "The Greengage Summer" (1961). Though he did make a few sporadic big screen appearances throughout the 1960s, and 1970s, he concentrated on the stage and TV. His last film role was as King Arthur in "Unidentified Flying Oddball" (1979).Gregson's 60s career was equally as sparse, although, like More, he did score one big critical success, "Live Now Pay Later" (1962). Unlike More's "Greengage Summer", however, Gregson's critical triumph proved so unpopular with the public, the movie's Australian distributor didn't even bother to release it! Gregson was reduced to accepting the lead in "Tomorrow at Ten". Good film, good director, but quite a comedown from the dizzy heights of "Genevieve". Gregson's Australian fans were denied the pleasure of seeing their idol in "Tomorrow at Ten" too, until it turned up on TV. There were to be no more top starring roles for Gregson on the big screen. A couple of cameo parts in "The Longest Day" (1962) and "The Night of the Generals" (1966) and a minor role as a doctor in "Fright" (1971) completed his cinema career.Interestingly, all three of the "Genevieve" trio commenced their progress towards stardom well before that fantastic success. More started acting in movies way back in 1935, when he debuted in "Look Up and Laugh", and appeared in eighteen more films before "Genevieve". Gregson made his debut in "Saraband for Dead Lovers" in 1948, and landed eleven more roles before his vintage car brought him fame and fortune. And Kay Kendall, would you believe, made her initial screen appearance in 1944 in "Fiddlers Three". Fourteen films followed until she suddenly became the "discovery sensation" of 1953.COMMENT: Atmospherically directed low-budget effort, with a cast and production values way beyond most of its quota quickie competitors. The screenplay is literate and concise, sometimes even rather witty, whilst the characters are interestingly defined and the plot riddled with suspenseful elements which the director puts across with maximum impact. Basil Emmott's effective camera-work also rates as a major factor in the film's success.OTHER VIEWS: John Gregson. Born at Liverpool in 1919. Married to Thea Gregory. Entered films in 1948. Pictures include Scott of the Antarctic, Saraband for Dead Lovers, Whiskey Galore, Train of Events, Treasure Island, Lavender Hill Mob, etc. 1951: Angels One Five. 1952: The Holly and the Ivy, The Brave Don't Cry, etc. Since 1953 he has appeared in The Venetian Bird, The Titfield Thunderbolt, Genevieve, To Dorothy a Son, Above Us the Waves, Value for Money, Battle of the River Plate, Jacqueline. 1956-57: True as a Turtle. 1959-60: The Captain's Table, Sea of Sand, S.O.S. Pacific, Faces in the Dark. 1960-61: Hand in Hand, Treasure of Monte Cristo, Frightened City. - Studio publicity.

When I watch a film like TOMORROW AT TEN, I'm a bit bemused because I can't understand why it's not better known. This is a cracking little thriller, one of the best of its era, and it really should be talked about today by film fans instead of being forgotten by all but the most dedicated viewers of the era. It's a pity that B-movie thrillers like this one are so little known as this sort of film more than holds its own against modern fare.There's no padding or fat in this story which gets going from the outset. A delightfully mannered Robert Shaw (on the cusp of stardom in FROM Russia WITH LOVE, although TOMORROW AT TEN was made in 1962 and not released until 1965) plays a kidnapper who abducts the son of a rich businessman and locks him in a room with a bomb hidden inside a Golliwog. The boy's father and a local detective inspector must negotiate before the bomb explodes - 'tomorrow at ten'.It's a great concept and the experienced director Lance Comfort makes a fine job of it. There's suspense in spades here, alongside plot twists you won't see coming and a delightfully tense race-against-the-clock (literally!) climax. The supporting cast includes notable roles for Kenneth Cope, Alec Clunes (father of Martin), Harry Fowler, William Hartnell, and Renee Houston. John Gregson's long-suffering detective inspector is one of the most sympathetic of his career.

This is an extremely taut and well made bottom of the bill thriller.The location in Winnington Road is only a a few hundred yards away from me and the house still stands.There are a number of flaws in the plot.Firstly allowing Clunes to be alone with shaw.Gregson doesn't give any specific reason for allowing this.Then Clunes being allowed to stay at the hospital bedside with the injured Shaw.When Shaw dies surely he would have been charged with at least manslaughter.Now we come to the final point.According to Google Maps the distance from Chiswick to Wimbledon is 8.9 miles and would take 24 minutes to arrive.There is no way that even a police car could do this journey in 15 minutes,so this rather for me at any rate left the ending fairly predictable.however this does not detract from what is a fine film.In the book "British B Movies" this film is nominated for then ten best produced post war.Incidentally it supported "Hud" on its release in those marvellous long gone days of double bills.

Suspenseful thriller in which Robert Shaw gets the lion's share as a kidnapper of a wealthy man's only son.The story almost entirely focuses on the villain and (it's rare ) tries to explain the reason why he did it .It's not only a matter of money as the viewer little by little discovers .The things themselves play a prominent part ,the ticking of the clocks or a jumping jack .The kidnapper is at hand ,under the police's eye ,like in more modern thrillers such as "oxygen" ;and of course there is a quarrel between the scared father and the police .The whole film is a race against the clock ,for the boy is in a house with a time bomb.